Infinix Note 30 4G vs Tecno Spark 20 Pro
Why Consider Each
An overview of the main advantages of each phone
Reasons to consider the Infinix Note 30 4G
- 36% higher Charging Watts (45 W vs 33 W)
- 16% higher HBM Brightness (580 Nits vs 500 Nits)
- Faster Storage Type: UFS 2.2 vs UFS 2.1
- Front Sensor: 16 MP = Hynix HI-1631Q
- Includes Reverse Charging
Reasons to consider the Tecno Spark 20 Pro
- 2.0x better Front Camera (32 MP vs 16 MP)
- 69% higher Camera (108 + 2 MP vs 64 + 2 + 0.3 MP)
- 6% lighter Weight (206 g vs 219 g)
- Peak Brightness: 580 Nits
- Front Flash: Dual-LED Flash
- Includes Wireless Charging
- Includes Reverse Wireless
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Product Name | Infinix Note 30 4G | Tecno Spark 20 Pro |
| Brand | infinix | Tecno |
| Official Brand Link | Visit | Visit |
| Mobile Image |
 |
 |
| Price | 40000 PKR | 35000 PKR |
| Price India | ₹13500 | ₹10000 |
| Price USA | $140 | $110 |
| Display | ||
| Phone Dimensions | 168.6 x 76.6 x 8.6 mm | 168.6 x 76.6 x 8.4 mm |
| Screen Size | 6.78 inch | 6.78 inch |
| Screen Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels | 1080 x 2460 Pixels |
| Refresh Rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Screen Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Peak Brightness | — | 580 Nits |
| HBM Brightness | 580 Nits | 500 Nits |
| Performance | ||
| Processor | Helio G99 | Helio G99 |
| Processor Link | Visit | Visit |
| Lithography Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| Max Clock | 2.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 Cores | 8 Cores |
| Architecture | 2 x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 | 2×2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu Benchmark | 560 K | 550 K |
| Memory | ||
| RAM Memory | 8 + 256 GB | 8 + 256 GB |
| RAM Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.1 |
| Card Slot | Yes | Yes |
| Variants | 8 + 128 GB | 8 + 256 GB |
| Rear Camera | ||
| Camera | 64 + 2 + 0.3 MP | 108 + 2 MP |
| Camera Sensor | 64 MP = mnivision OV64B | 108 MP = Samsung HM6 |
| Zoom | — | - |
| Digital Zoom | 10 x | 10 x |
| Video Recording | 2K @ 30fps | 2K@ 30 fps |
| Flash | Quad-LED Flash | Quad-LED Flash |
| Front Camera | ||
| Front Camera | 16 MP | 32 MP |
| Front Sensor | 16 MP = Hynix HI-1631Q | — |
| Front Recording | 2K @ 30fps | 2K@ 30 fps |
| Front Flash | — | Dual-LED Flash |
| Battery | ||
| Battery | 5000 mAH | 5000 mAh |
| Charging Watts | 45 W | 33 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wireless Charging | — | No |
| Reverse Charging | Yes | No |
| Reverse Wireless | — | No |
| Charging Time | 60 Mints | 1:12 hr |
| Software | ||
| Model Number | X6833B, X6716B | KJ6 |
| Release Date | 22 May, 2023 | 1 December, 2023 |
| Year | 2023 | 2023 |
| Series Name | Note Series | Spark Series |
| Category | Mid-range | Mid-Range |
| Android OS | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Body | ||
| Weight | 219 g | 206 g |
| Build | Plastic frame, Glass back | Plastic ( Back And Frame ) |
| IP Rating | ip 53 | ip 53 |
| Special Features | — | – |
| Connectivity | ||
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Dual Nano-SIM |
| Network | 4G | 4G |
| WiFi | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Security & Audio | ||
| Speakers | Dual Stereo Speaker | Dual Stereo Speaker |
| Fingerprint | Side Mounted | Side Mounted |
| Other Sensors | – Proximity sensor | ✅ Accelerometer |
| Highlights | ||
| Display Highlights |
 |
 |
| Processor Highlights |
 |
 |
| Memory Highlights |
 |
 |
| Camera Highlights |
 |
 |
| Battery Highlights |
 |
 |
| Verdict | ||
| Pros | ✅ AMOLED display 📱 | Smooth 120Hz Display |
| Cons | ❌ No 5G support 📶 | LCD Instead AMOLED |
| Best For | 🎯 Camera-focused users 📷 | Everyday Smartphone Use |
| Not Best For | 🚫 5G network users 📡 | 5G Connectivity Seekers |
| Related Media | ||
| Unboxing | ||
| Mobile Disassembly | ||
| PUBG Gaming Test | ||
| Camera Test | ||
Cast your vote
So, which phone would you choose?
Total votes: 0
This comparison covers specs and pricing for 50+ countries — select your country next to the search bar to see local pricing based on the live USD rate. Prices can vary by region due to local taxes, import duties, and retailer markups.
How the Comparison Tool Works