Tecno Camon 40 Premier vs Oppo Reno 13 Pro
Why Consider Each
An overview of the main advantages of each phone
Reasons to consider the Tecno Camon 40 Premier
- + 20% higher Refresh Rate (144 Hz vs 120 Hz)
- + 6% bigger Screen Size (6.67 inch vs 6.32 inch)
- + Better Screen Type: LTPO Amoled vs Amoled
- + Faster Storage Type: UFS 4.0 vs UFS 3.1
Reasons to consider the Oppo Reno 13 Pro
- + 18% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (2 M vs 1.7 M)
- + 17% higher Zoom (3.5 x vs 3 x)
- + 14% higher Charging Watts (80 W vs 70 W)
- + 14% larger Battery (5800 mAh vs 5100 mAh)
- + 13% higher HBM Brightness (~1800 nits vs 1600 Nits)
- + Peak Brightness: 3600 nits
- + Better Processor: Dimensity 8450 vs Dimensity 8350
- + Digital Zoom: 18 x
- + Includes Wireless Charging
- + Includes Reverse Charging
- + Includes Reverse Wireless
- + Newer Network: 4G / 4G+ / 5G vs 4G / 4G+
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Product Name | Tecno Camon 40 Premier | Oppo Reno 13 Pro |
| Brand | Tecno | OPPO |
| Official Brand Link | Visit | Visit |
| Mobile Image |
![]() |
![]() |
| Price | 110000 PKR | 143000 PKR |
| Price India | ₹30000 | ₹50000 |
| Price USA | $320 | $650 |
| Variants Prices | 12+256 GB | ₹30,000 INR | $320 | PKR 110,000 | 12 + 256 GB 12 + 512 GB |
| Display | ||
| Phone Dimensions | 161 x 75 x 7.7 mm | 151.2 x 72.4 x 8 mm |
| Screen Size | 6.67 inch | 6.32 inch |
| Screen Resolution | 1260 x 2800 Pixels | 1216 x 2640 Pixels |
| Refresh Rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Screen Type | LTPO Amoled | Amoled |
| Peak Brightness | - | 3600 nits |
| HBM Brightness | 1600 Nits | ~1800 nits |
| Performance | ||
| Processor | Dimensity 8350 | Dimensity 8450 |
| Lithography Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Max Clock | 3.35 GHz | 3.25 GHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 Cores | 8 Cores |
| Architecture | 1 x 3.35GHz | 1 x 3.25 GHz Cortex-A725 |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC6 | Mali-G720 MC7 |
| AnTuTu Benchmark | 1.7 M | 2 M |
| Bootup Time | - | 19 s |
| Memory | ||
| RAM Memory | 12+256 GB | 12 + 512 GB |
| RAM Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 3.1 |
| Card Slot | No | No |
| Variants | 12 + 256GB | 12 + 256 GB |
| Rear Camera | ||
| Camera | 50 + 50 + 50 MP | 50 + 50 + 8 MP |
| Image Resolution | 8160 × 6144 Pixels | 8150 x 6150 pixels |
| Camera Sensor | 50 MP = Sony LYT-701 | – |
| Zoom | 3 x | 3.5 x |
| Digital Zoom | - | 18 x |
| Video Recording | 4K @ 60 fps | 4K @ 30/60 fps |
| Flash | Dual-LED Flash | Yes |
| Front Camera | ||
| Front Camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Front Sensor | – | – |
| Front Resolution | 8160 × 6144 Pixels | 8192 x 6144 Pixels |
| Front Recording | 4K@ 30 fps | 4K @ 30/60 fps |
| Front Flash | Screen Flash | Screen Flash |
| Battery | ||
| Battery | 5100 mAh | 5800 mAh |
| Charging Watts | 70 W | 80 W |
| Battery Type | Silicon Carbon | Silicon-Carbon |
| Wireless Charging | - | No |
| Reverse Charging | - | Yes |
| Reverse Wireless | - | No |
| Battery Life (PC Mark) | - | 10h 30m |
| Charging Time | 40-50m (0-100%) | 60-70 m (0% To 100%) |
| Software | ||
| Model Number | CM8 | CPH2813 |
| Release Date | 1 May, 2025 | 2 January, 2026 |
| Year | 2025 | 2026 |
| Series Name | Camon Series | Oppo Reno Series |
| Category | Premium mid-range | Flagship |
| Android OS | Android 17, HiOS 17 | Android 17 Now |
| Body | ||
| Weight | 193 g | 187 g |
| Build | Plastic ( Frame And Back) | Frame Aluminum And Glass Back |
| IP Rating | — | — |
| Special Features | – |
|
| Connectivity | ||
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM / E-Sim |
| Network | 4G / 4G+ | 4G / 4G+ / 5G |
| WiFi | Wi-Fi 6E | WiFi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Security & Audio | ||
| Speakers | Dual Stereo Speaker | Dual Stereo Speaker |
| Fingerprint | Hyper Sonic Front Finger | Hyper Sonic Front Finger |
| Other Sensors | ✅ Accelerometer | Accelerometer |
| Highlights | ||
| Display Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Processor Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Memory Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Camera Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Battery Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Verdict | ||
| Pros | ✅ LTPO AMOLED (6.67″ 144Hz display) | ✅ 50MP telephoto zoom 🔭 |
| Cons | ❌ No microSD (Storage not expandable) | ❌ No headphone jack 🎧 |
| Best For | ✅ Best For | 🎯 Zoom photography fans 🔭 |
| Not Best For | ❌ Not Best For | 🚫 Flagship chip seekers 🚀 |
| Related Media | ||
| Rival Devices | — | vivo V70 |
| Unboxing | ||
| Mobile Disassembly | — | |
| PUBG Gaming Test | ||
| Camera Test | ||
Cast your vote
So, which phone would you choose?
Total votes: 0
Related Comparisons
This comparison covers specs and pricing for 50+ countries — select your country next to the search bar to see local pricing based on the live USD rate. Prices can vary by region due to local taxes, import duties, and retailer markups.
How the Comparison Tool Works











