Tecno Camon 50 Pro 4G vs Motorola Moto G77
Why Consider Each
An overview of the main advantages of each phone
Reasons to consider the Tecno Camon 50 Pro 4G
- 50% higher Charging Watts (45 W vs 30 W)
- 20% higher Refresh Rate (144 Hz vs 120 Hz)
- 18% larger Battery (6150 mAh vs 5200 mAh)
- HBM Brightness: 1600 Nits
- Zoom: 3 x
- Digital Zoom: 60 x
- Includes Reverse Charging
Reasons to consider the Motorola Moto G77
- 2.2x better Camera (108+ 8 MP vs 50+50+8 MP)
- 18% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (590 K vs 500 K)
- 14% higher Max Clock (2.5 GHz vs 2.2 GHz)
- 11% higher Peak Brightness (5000 Nits vs 4500 Nits)
- 5% higher Screen Resolution (1272 x 2772 Pixels vs 1208 x 2644 Pixels)
- Better Processor: Dimensity 6400 vs Helio G200
- Includes Card Slot
- Includes Wireless Charging
- Includes Reverse Wireless
- Build: si-polymer (eco leather) back, plasti…
- Newer Network: 4G / 4G+ / 5G vs 4G / 4G+
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Product Name | Tecno Camon 50 Pro 4G | Motorola Moto G77 |
| Brand | Tecno | Motorola |
| Official Brand Link | Visit | Visit |
| Mobile Image |
 |
 |
| Price | 100000 PKR | 93000 PKR |
| Price India | ₹30000 | ₹25000 |
| Price USA | $320 | $270 |
| Variants Prices | 8 + 256GB = 90,000 | 300 $ | 28,000 INR | 8 + 256 GB |
| Display | ||
| Phone Dimensions | 162.4 x 77 x 7.4 mm | 164.2 x 77.4 x 7.3 mm |
| Screen Size | 6.78 inch | 6.78 inch |
| Screen Resolution | 1208 x 2644 Pixels | 1272 x 2772 Pixels |
| Refresh Rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Screen Type | Amoled | AMOLED |
| Peak Brightness | 4500 Nits | 5000 Nits |
| HBM Brightness | 1600 Nits | - |
| Performance | ||
| Processor | Helio G200 | Dimensity 6400 |
| Lithography Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| Max Clock | 2.2 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 Cores | 8 Cores |
| Architecture | 2×2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 | 2 x 2.5 GHz Cortex-A76 |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu Benchmark | 500 K | 590 K |
| Bootup Time | - | - |
| Memory | ||
| RAM Memory | 8 + 256 GB | 8+256 GB |
| RAM Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Card Slot | Not Confirm | Yes |
| Variants | 8 + 256GB | 8+128 GB |
| Rear Camera | ||
| Camera | 50+50+8 MP | 108+ 8 MP |
| Image Resolution | 8160 × 6144 pixels | 12,000 × 9,000 pixels |
| Camera Sensor | 50 MP = Sony LYT-700C | 108 MP = Samsung HM6 |
| Zoom | 3 x | - |
| Digital Zoom | 60 x | - |
| Video Recording | 2K@ 30 fps | 2K@30 FPS |
| Flash | Dual-LED Flash | LED Flash |
| Front Camera | ||
| Front Camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| Front Sensor | – | 32 MP = Not Confirm |
| Front Resolution | 6528 × 4896 Pixels | 6,532 × 4,899 pixels |
| Front Recording | 2K@ 30 fps | 2K@30 FPS |
| Front Flash | Screen Flash | Screen Flash |
| Battery | ||
| Battery | 6150 mAh | 5200 mAh |
| Charging Watts | 45 W | 30 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Silicon-Carbon |
| Wireless Charging | - | No |
| Reverse Charging | Yes | No |
| Reverse Wireless | - | No |
| Battery Life (PC Mark) | - | Not Confirm |
| Charging Time | 1 hour 20 mints (0-100%) | Not Confirm |
| Software | ||
| Model Number | CN5c | XT2621-4 |
| Release Date | 10 March, 2026 | 29 January, 2026 |
| Year | 2026 | 2026 |
| Series Name | Camon Series | Moto Series |
| Category | Mid-Range | Mid-range |
| Android OS | Android 17, HiOS 17 | Android 16 |
| Body | ||
| Weight | 178 g | 182 g |
| Build | - | si-polymer (eco leather) back, plastic frame |
| IP Rating | — | — |
| Special Features | – | – |
| Connectivity | ||
| SIM | Dual Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + E-Sim |
| Network | 4G / 4G+ | 4G / 4G+ / 5G |
| WiFi | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Security & Audio | ||
| Speakers | Dual Stereo Speaker | Dual Stereo Speaker |
| Fingerprint | Front Finger | Front Finger |
| Other Sensors | ✅ Accelerometer | – Proximity sensor |
| Highlights | ||
| Display Highlights |
 |
 |
| Processor Highlights |
 |
 |
| Memory Highlights |
 |
 |
| Camera Highlights |
 |
 |
| Battery Highlights |
 |
 |
| Verdict | ||
| Pros | ✅ AMOLED Display (6.78″ FHD+ AMOLED) |
|
| Cons | ❌ 4G Only (No 5G support) |
|
| Best For | ✅ Daily Usage |
|
| Not Best For | ❌ 5G Users |
|
| Related Media | ||
| Rival Devices | — | Honor x9c |
| Unboxing | ||
| Mobile Disassembly | — | |
| PUBG Gaming Test | — | |
| Camera Test | ||
Cast your vote
So, which phone would you choose?
Total votes: 0
This comparison covers specs and pricing for 50+ countries — select your country next to the search bar to see local pricing based on the live USD rate. Prices can vary by region due to local taxes, import duties, and retailer markups.
How the Comparison Tool Works