• Mobiles
  • Processors
  • Mobiles
  • Processors
  • Mobiles
  • Processors

✪ IQOO 12 ✪

IQOO 12 Specs, Price, Camera, Battery & Review (2026)
United States flag United States
$600 USD
…
Pakistan flag Pakistan (PKR)
180,000 PKR
India flag India (INR)
₹55,000 INR

✪ IQOO 12 ✪

IQOO 12 Specs, Price, Camera, Battery & Review (2026)
Last Time Update : 7 October, 2026
0

Quick Specifications

LTPO AMOLED

Display Type

Snapdragon 8 Gen 3

Processor

16 + 512 GB

Ram And Memory

64 + 50 + 50 MP

Camera

5000 mAh

Battery

120 W

Fast Charging

Full Specification

BASIC INFO
Mobile
IQOO 12
Model
V2307A
Series
iQOO Number Series
Category
Flagship / Gaming
Release Date
14 November,2023
Year
2023
CONNECTIVITY
Sim
Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Network
4G / 4G+ / 5G
WiFi
Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth
5.4
NFC
Yes
OS
Android 16
BODY
Dimensions
163.2 x 75.9 x 8.1 mm
Build
Metal frame , Glass Back
KG Weight
204 g
Screen Size
6.78 inch
Resolution
1260 x 2800 Pixels
Type
LTPO AMOLED
Refresh Rate
144 Hz
Peak Brightness
3000 nits
HBM Brightness
1400 nits
Processor
Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
Max Clock
3.3 GHz
Lithography
4 nm
GPU
Adreno 750
CPU Cores
8 Cores
Antutu v11
2.3 M
Bootup Time
21 s
Architecture
1 x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4
3 x 3.2 GHz Cortex-A720
2 x 3.0 GHz Cortex-A720
2 x 2.3 GHz Cortex-A520
Ram Memory
16 + 512 GB
Ram Type
LPDDR5X
Storage Type
UFS 4.0
SD Card
No
Variants
12+ 256 GB
16+ 512 GB
16+ 1 TB
MP
Rear Camera
64 + 50 + 50 MP
Front Camera
16 MP
SENSORS
Camera Sensors
64 MP= Omnivision OV64B
50 MP= Samsung S5KJN1
50 MP=Omnivision OV50H
Front Sensors
16 MP=Samsung S5K3P9
RECORDING FPS
Main Recording
8K @30fps
4K @30/60fps
1080p @30/60/120/240fps
Front Recording
1080p @30fps
RESOLUTION
Main Resolution
8160 × 6144 pixels
Front Resolution
4608 x 3456 Pixels
ZOOM
Optical Zoom
3 x
D Digital Zoom
100 x
FLASH
Flash
Dual-LED Flash
Front Flash
No
Capacity
5000 mAh
Fast Charging
120 W
Wireless Charging
-
Li Battery Type
Li-Po
REVERSE
Reverse Wired
Yes
Reverse Wireless
-
OTHER
Battery PC Marks
13 hour
Charging Time
25 minutes ( 0-100% )
AUDIO & SENSORS
Speaker
Dual Stereo Speaker
Fingerprint Sensor
Hyper Sonic Front Finger
Other Sensors
Accelerometer
Gyroscope
Compass
Proximity
Ambient Light
Gravity sensor
Special Features

–

BASIC INFO
Mobile
IQOO 12
Model
V2307A
Series
iQOO Number Series
Category
Flagship / Gaming
Release Date
14 November,2023
Year
2023
CONNECTIVITY
Sim
Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Network
4G / 4G+ / 5G
WiFi
Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth
5.4
NFC
Yes
OS
Android 16
BODY
Dimensions
163.2 x 75.9 x 8.1 mm
Build
Metal frame , Glass Back
KG Weight
204 g
Screen Size
6.78 inch
Resolution
1260 x 2800 Pixels
Type
LTPO AMOLED
Refresh Rate
144 Hz
Peak Brightness
3000 nits
HBM Brightness
1400 nits
Processor
Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
Max Clock
3.3 GHz
Lithography
4 nm
GPU
Adreno 750
CPU Cores
8 Cores
Antutu v11
2.3 M
Bootup Time
21 s
Architecture
1 x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4
3 x 3.2 GHz Cortex-A720
2 x 3.0 GHz Cortex-A720
2 x 2.3 GHz Cortex-A520
Ram Memory
16 + 512 GB
SD Card
No
Ram Type
LPDDR5X
Storage Type
UFS 4.0
Variants
12+ 256 GB
16+ 512 GB
16+ 1 TB
MP
Rear Camera
64 + 50 + 50 MP
Front Camera
16 MP
SENSORS
Main Camera Sensors
64 MP= Omnivision OV64B
50 MP= Samsung S5KJN1
50 MP=Omnivision OV50H
Front Camera Sensors
16 MP=Samsung S5K3P9
RECORDING FPS
Main Recording
8K @30fps
4K @30/60fps
1080p @30/60/120/240fps
Front Recording
1080p @30fps
RESOLUTION
Main Resolution
8160 × 6144 pixels
Front Resolution
4608 x 3456 Pixels
ZOOM
Optical Zoom
3 x
D Digital Zoom
100 x
FLASH
Flash
Dual-LED Flash
Front Flash
No
Capacity
5000 mAh
Fast Charging
120 W
Wireless Charging
-
Li Battery Type
Li-Po
REVERSE
Reverse Wired
Yes
Reverse Wireless
-
OTHER
Battery Life PCMark
13 hour
Charging Time
25 minutes ( 0-100% )
AUDIO & SENSORS
Speaker
Dual Stereo Speaker
Fingerprint Sensor
Hyper Sonic Front Finger
Other Sensors
Accelerometer
Gyroscope
Compass
Proximity
Ambient Light
Gravity sensor
Special Features

–

Highlights & Review Of IQOO 12

Display Review:

The iQOO 12 features a 6.78-inch LTPO AMOLED display at 1260 × 2800 pixels (1.5K), a 144Hz adaptive refresh rate (1–144Hz), 452 ppi pixel density, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 1B colors, and up to 3,000 nits peak brightness (1,400 nits HBM) with Corning Gorilla Glass 5 protection, making it the sharpest and most color-accurate display in this group for gaming, media consumption, and outdoor visibility.

The Samsung Galaxy S26 FE uses a 6.7-inch Dynamic AMOLED 2X panel at 1080 × 2340 pixels (FHD+), a 120Hz adaptive refresh rate (60/120Hz), 385 ppi pixel density, HDR10+, 16M colors, and up to 1,900 nits peak brightness (HBM) with Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ protection, offering the largest display in this group but the lowest pixel density and brightness, making it suitable for media consumption but less ideal for gaming or outdoor visibility.

The Oppo Reno 15 Pro features a 6.78-inch LTPO AMOLED display at 1264 × 2780 pixels (1.5K), a 120Hz adaptive refresh rate (1–120Hz), HDR10+, 1B colors, and up to 3,600 nits peak brightness with Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 protection, offering the highest peak brightness in this group for outdoor visibility, though it trails the iQOO 12 in refresh rate (120Hz vs 144Hz) and pixel density (459 ppi vs 452 ppi).

The Infinix GT 50 Pro uses a 6.78-inch LTPS AMOLED panel at 1208 × 2644 pixels (1.5K), a 144Hz refresh rate (30–144Hz), 440 ppi pixel density, 2304Hz PWM dimming, HDR10+, 1B colors, and up to 4,500 nits peak brightness with Corning Gorilla Glass 7i protection, offering the highest PWM dimming and peak brightness for gaming and outdoor visibility, though it trails the iQOO 12 in resolution (1.5K vs 1.5K) and pixel density (440 ppi vs 452 ppi).

The Infinix GT 50 Pro dominates with its 6.78-inch 1.5K LTPS AMOLED panel, 144Hz refresh rate, 2304Hz PWM dimming, and 4,500 nits peak brightness, making it the best choice for gaming, outdoor visibility, and smooth motion. The Oppo Reno 15 Pro offers the highest peak brightness (3,600 nits) for outdoor visibility, though it trails in refresh rate (120Hz vs 144Hz).

The iQOO 12 provides a balanced 1.5K LTPO AMOLED panel with 144Hz refresh rate and 3,000 nits peak brightness for gaming and media consumption, while the Samsung Galaxy S26 FE trails with FHD+ resolution, 1,900 nits peak brightness, and 16M colors, making it suitable for everyday use but less ideal for gaming or HDR content.

Processor Review:

The iQOO 12 is powered by Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm) chipset with an octa-core CPU (1x 3.3GHz + 3x 3.15GHz + 2x 3.0GHz + 2x 2.3GHz) and Adreno 750 GPU, scoring ~2,084,308 to 2,332,791 points on AnTuTu v11, with Geekbench 6 single-core at ~2,272 and multi-core at ~7,191, making it the fastest in this group for raw AnTuTu scores, gaming, and sustained performance, thanks to its 16GB LPDDR5X RAM and 512GB UFS 4.1 storage

The Samsung Galaxy S26 FE uses Samsung’s Exynos 2500 (3nm) chipset with a 10-core CPU (1x 3.3GHz Cortex-X925 + 3x 2.74GHz + 4x 2.36GHz + 2x 1.8GHz) and Xclipse 950 GPU, scoring ~2,289,696 to 2,455,392 points on AnTuTu v11, with Geekbench 6 single-core at ~2,400+ and multi-core at ~7,704, making it competitive with the iQOO 12 in raw AnTuTu scores but slower in single-core Geekbench, with strong sustained performance and One UI 9 optimization

The Oppo Reno 15 Pro is powered by MediaTek’s Dimensity 8450 (4nm) chipset with an octa-core CPU (1x 3.4GHz + 3x 2.85GHz + 4x 2.0GHz) and Mali-G720 MC8 GPU, scoring ~2,050,891 to 2,057,699 points on AnTuTu v11, with Geekbench 6 single-core at ~1,612 and multi-core at ~5,407, making it the third-fastest in this group for raw AnTuTu scores, with strong sustained performance and 12GB LPDDR5X RAM for multitasking.

The Infinix GT 50 Pro uses MediaTek’s Dimensity 8400 Ultimate (4nm) chipset with an octa-core CPU (8x 3.25GHz Cortex-A725) and Mali-G720 MC8 GPU, scoring ~1,808,355 to 2,139,330 points on AnTuTu v11, with Geekbench 6 single-core at ~1,156–1,587 and multi-core at ~5,407–6,806, making it the slowest in this group for raw AnTuTu scores, though it offers strong sustained performance with 12GB LPDDR5X RAM and 256GB UFS 4.1 storage.

Processor & AnTuTu v11 Comparison Table

FeatureiQOO 12Samsung Galaxy S26 FEOppo Reno 15 ProInfinix GT 50 Pro
ChipsetSnapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm)Exynos 2500 (3nm)Dimensity 8450 (4nm)Dimensity 8400 Ultimate (4nm)
CPU1x 3.3GHz + 3x 3.15GHz + 2x 3.0GHz + 2x 2.3GHz1x 3.3GHz + 3x 2.74GHz + 4x 2.36GHz + 2x 1.8GHz1x 3.4GHz + 3x 2.85GHz + 4x 2.0GHz8x 3.25GHz Cortex-A725
GPUAdreno 750Xclipse 950Mali-G720 MC8Mali-G720 MC8
AnTuTu v11 Score~2,084,308 – 2,332,791~2,289,696 – 2,455,392~2,050,891 – 2,057,699~1,808,355 – 2,139,330
Geekbench 6 Single~2,272~2,400+~1,612~1,156–1,587
Geekbench 6 Multi~7,191~7,704~5,407~5,407–6,806
RAM + Storage16GB + 512GB (LPDDR5X + UFS 4.1)8GB + 256GB (LPDDR5X + UFS 4.0)12GB + 512GB (LPDDR5X + UFS 4.1)12GB + 256GB (LPDDR5X + UFS 4.1)
Best ForGaming & peak performanceSoftware support & ecosystemMedia consumption & everyday useGaming & battery conservation

AnTuTu v11 Percentage Difference

  • iQOO 12 vs Samsung Galaxy S26 FE: -2–10% slower (2.08–2.33M vs 2.29–2.46M average)

  • iQOO 12 vs Oppo Reno 15 Pro: +1–14% faster (2.08–2.33M vs 2.05–2.06M average)

  • iQOO 12 vs Infinix GT 50 Pro: +8–29% faster (2.08–2.33M vs 1.81–2.14M average)

  • Samsung Galaxy S26 FE vs Oppo Reno 15 Pro: +11–20% faster (2.29–2.46M vs 2.05–2.06M average)

  • Samsung Galaxy S26 FE vs Infinix GT 50 Pro: +15–36% faster (2.29–2.46M vs 1.81–2.14M average)

  • Oppo Reno 15 Pro vs Infinix GT 50 Pro: +4–14% faster (2.05–2.06M vs 1.81–2.14M average)

Verdict

The Samsung Galaxy S26 FE leads in raw AnTuTu v11 scores (~2.29–2.46M points) and single-core Geekbench (~2,400+), making it the best choice for users who prioritize peak performance, software support, and ecosystem integration. The iQOO 12 offers competitive performance (~2.08–2.33M points) with strong gaming and multitasking, while the Oppo Reno 15 Pro provides balanced performance (~2.05–2.06M points) with strong media consumption and everyday use. The Infinix GT 50 Pro trails with ~1.81–2.14M points but remains competitive for gaming and battery conservation.

Ram & Memory Review:

The iQOO 12 16GB + 512GB has the highest physical RAM capacity in this comparison while also providing 512GB storage. iQOO officially lists 16GB RAM and 512GB storage, with LPDDR5X memory and UFS 4.0 storage.

The OPPO Reno15 Pro 12GB + 512GB provides 4GB less physical RAM than the iQOO 12 while retaining the same 512GB storage capacity. OPPO confirms LPDDR5X RAM and UFS 3.1 storage for the 12GB + 512GB configuration.

The Samsung Galaxy S26 FE 8GB + 256GB is clearly behind on capacity. Samsung’s Pakistan specification confirms the supplied 8GB RAM + 256GB storage configuration. Samsung’s official Pakistan store also lists 8GB + 256GB among the available S26 FE configurations.

The Infinix GT 50 Pro 12GB + 256GB matches the OPPO’s physical RAM capacity but provides only half the storage capacity of the iQOO 12 and OPPO Reno15 Pro. The Pakistan listing confirms the 12GB + 256GB configuration and Dimensity 8400 Ultimate platform.

All four phones therefore differ significantly in the supplied configurations: iQOO 12 = 16GB + 512GB, OPPO Reno15 Pro = 12GB + 512GB, Infinix GT 50 Pro = 12GB + 256GB, and Galaxy S26 FE = 8GB + 256GB.

RAM & Memory winner: iQOO 12. It has both the highest physical RAM capacity and the largest storage capacity among the supplied variants.

Cameras Review:

The iQOO 12 features a triple rear camera system with a 50MP OmniVision OV50H main sensor (1/1.3″, f/1.68, OIS), a 64MP OmniVision OV64B periscope telephoto (1/2″, 3x optical zoom, f/2.57, OIS, 100x digital zoom), and a 50MP Samsung JN1 ultrawide (1/2.76″, f/2.0, 119° FOV, AF), plus a 16MP front camera (f/2.45). It records rear video up to 8K@30fps (main + 2x zoom), 4K@60fps (all rear cameras), 1080p@240fps, and gyro-EIS, with front video at 1080p@30fps, making it the most versatile for photography and video in this group.gsmarena+10

The Samsung Galaxy S26 FE offers a triple rear camera system with a 50MP main sensor (1/1.57″, f/1.8, OIS, PDAF), a 12MP ultrawide (f/2.2, 120° FOV), and an 8MP telephoto (3x optical zoom, f/2.4, OIS, PDAF), plus a 12MP front camera (f/2.2). It records rear video up to 8K@30fps (main), 4K@120fps (main), 4K@60fps (all rear cameras), and 10-bit HDR10+, with front video at 4K@60fps, making it the most versatile for video recording in this group.

The Oppo Reno 15 Pro features a triple rear camera system with a 200MP main sensor (f/1.8, OIS), a 50MP ultrawide (f/2.0, 116° FOV, AF), and a 50MP telephoto (3x optical zoom, f/2.5, OIS), plus a 32MP front camera (f/2.4). It records rear video up to 4K@60fps (main + ultrawide), 1080p@480fps, and 4K HDR Ultra-Steady, with front video at 4K@60fps, making it the best for high-resolution photography and video stabilization.

The Infinix GT 50 Pro is equipped with a dual rear camera system with a 64MP main sensor (f/1.8, OIS) and an 8MP ultrawide (f/2.2, 120° FOV), plus a 32MP front camera (f/2.2). It records rear video up to 4K@60fps (main), 1080p@240fps, with front video capped at 1080p@30fps, making it the weakest for photography versatility in this group.

Camera Sensors & Video Recording Comparison Table

FeatureiQOO 12Samsung Galaxy S26 FEOppo Reno 15 ProInfinix GT 50 Pro
Main Camera50MP OmniVision OV50H (1/1.3″, f/1.68, OIS)50MP (1/1.57″, f/1.8, OIS)200MP (f/1.8, OIS)64MP (f/1.8, OIS)
Telephoto64MP OmniVision OV64B (3x, f/2.57, OIS, 100x digital)8MP (3x, f/2.4, OIS)50MP (3x, f/2.5, OIS)None
Ultrawide50MP Samsung JN1 (1/2.76″, f/2.0, 119°, AF)12MP (f/2.2, 120°)50MP (f/2.0, 116°, AF)8MP (f/2.2, 120°)
Front Camera16MP (f/2.45)12MP (f/2.2)32MP (f/2.4)32MP (f/2.2)
Rear Video Max8K@30fps (main + 2x zoom), 4K@60fps (all)8K@30fps (main), 4K@120fps (main), 4K@60fps (all)4K@60fps (main + ultrawide), 1080p@480fps4K@60fps (main), 1080p@240fps
Front Video Max1080p@30fps4K@60fps4K@60fps1080p@30fps
Special Features8K@30fps, 100x digital zoom, gyro-EIS8K@30fps, 10-bit HDR10+4K HDR Ultra-Steady, 200MP mainNone

Verdict

The iQOO 12 dominates with its 50MP main + 64MP 3x periscope telephoto + 50MP ultrawide system, 8K@30fps video, and 100x digital zoom, making it the best choice for photography enthusiasts and content creators who need maximum versatility. The Oppo Reno 15 Pro offers a strong 200MP main + 50MP 3x telephoto + 50MP ultrawide system with 4K@60fps video and 4K HDR Ultra-Steady, making it ideal for high-resolution photography and video stabilization.

The Samsung Galaxy S26 FE provides a reliable 50MP main + 8MP 3x telephoto + 12MP ultrawide setup with 8K@30fps video, though it trails in telephoto resolution and sensor quality. The Infinix GT 50 Pro is the weakest, with no telephoto lens, 64MP main + 8MP ultrawide only, and 1080p@30fps front video, making it unsuitable for serious photography or video work despite its gaming focus.

Battery Review:

The Infinix GT 50 Pro has the largest battery at 6500mAh, followed by the OPPO Reno15 Pro at 6200mAh, while the iQOO 12 and Samsung Galaxy S26 FE provide 5000mAh and 4900mAh respectively. Battery capacity therefore favors Infinix, but charging speed changes the picture.

The iQOO 12 combines its 5000mAh battery with extremely fast 120W charging. iQOO also specifies a dual-cell battery design and 120W FlashCharge. This makes the phone particularly attractive to users who prefer short charging sessions.

The OPPO Reno15 Pro has a 6200mAh battery and 80W SUPERVOOC, with OPPO reporting laboratory charging and endurance figures under its own testing conditions. The larger battery makes it better positioned for long daily use, while 80W remains fast enough for quick top-ups.

The Infinix GT 50 Pro leads on raw capacity with 6500mAh, but its Pakistan specification lists 45W wired charging. The same listing also identifies a 30W wireless-charging capability.

The Galaxy S26 FE has the smallest battery here at 4900mAh, although Samsung rates it for up to 29 hours of video playback and supports wireless charging. Its charging system is more convenience-oriented than speed-oriented.

A larger mAh figure does not automatically prove longer real-world endurance, so this category should distinguish capacity from charging performance.

Battery winner: OPPO Reno15 Pro for the best overall balance of capacity and charging. Infinix GT 50 Pro wins raw capacity, while iQOO 12 wins charging speed.

Final Verdict :

Value For Money

At the supplied Pakistan retailer price of 180K–200K PKR, the iQOO 12 16GB + 512GB offers an unusually strong hardware package for this comparison. Its 16GB RAM and 512GB UFS 4.0 storage are superior in capacity to the Samsung and Infinix configurations, while its Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 performance leads the available AnTuTu v11 comparison.

The Infinix GT 50 Pro at 160,000 PKR is the cheapest option by a significant margin. It provides 12GB + 256GB, a 144Hz AMOLED display, Dimensity 8400 Ultimate, 6500mAh battery, liquid cooling and gaming triggers. Its main compromises are the smaller 256GB storage capacity, weaker camera configuration and slower 45W wired charging.

The OPPO Reno15 Pro at 235,000 PKR is substantially more expensive than the iQOO 12, but its 12GB + 512GB configuration, 200MP main camera, 50MP telephoto, 6200mAh battery and 80W charging make it a much more camera-oriented package.

The Samsung Galaxy S26 FE at 235,000 PKR is also significantly more expensive than the iQOO 12 in the supplied retailer snapshot. Its strengths include Samsung’s software ecosystem, Dynamic AMOLED 2X display, wireless charging, IP-oriented flagship design and long-term software support, but the supplied 8GB + 256GB configuration is weaker on raw hardware capacity. Samsung’s official Pakistan store currently lists the 8GB + 256GB model at Rs. 249,999, so the user’s 235,000 PKR retailer price should remain treated as a snapshot rather than official MSRP.

Value winner: iQOO 12. It offers the strongest combination of performance, 16GB RAM, 512GB storage, 144Hz LTPO AMOLED and 120W charging at the supplied 180K–200K PKR price.

Best For / Not Best For

iQOO 12 — Best for performance, gaming and flagship hardware value

The iQOO 12 is best for users who want Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 performance, 16GB RAM, 512GB storage, 144Hz LTPO AMOLED, 120W charging and a dedicated periscope telephoto camera.

Not best for: users whose first priority is maximum battery capacity or the most camera-focused hardware.

Samsung Galaxy S26 FE — Best for Samsung ecosystem and balanced everyday use

The Galaxy S26 FE suits buyers who prioritize Samsung’s software ecosystem, Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 120Hz adaptive refresh, wireless charging and a versatile triple-camera setup. Samsung officially confirms the 8GB + 256GB configuration supplied for this comparison.

Not best for: buyers looking for maximum RAM, storage or charging speed per PKR.

OPPO Reno15 Pro — Best for camera-focused users

The Reno15 Pro is the strongest choice for camera hardware, portrait photography, selfie/vlogging features and battery capacity. Its 200MP OIS main camera, 50MP OIS telephoto and 50MP ultrawide selfie camera make it the most imaging-oriented phone here.

Not best for: buyers who prioritize flagship-level benchmark performance at the lowest price.

Infinix GT 50 Pro — Best for budget gaming

The GT 50 Pro is the specialist value gaming choice, offering Dimensity 8400 Ultimate, 144Hz AMOLED, 6500mAh battery, liquid cooling and gaming controls at the supplied 160K PKR price.

Not best for: users who need 512GB storage or a versatile telephoto camera.

Final Verdict

The iQOO 12 is the overall winner of this comparison because it provides the strongest combination of performance, memory capacity, display technology, charging speed and price.

Its 16GB + 512GB configuration is particularly important: it gives the iQOO 12 more physical RAM than every rival in the supplied variants and more storage than the Samsung Galaxy S26 FE and Infinix GT 50 Pro. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 also leads the available AnTuTu v11 averages.

The OPPO Reno15 Pro is the strongest specialist alternative. It loses the performance/value contest but clearly becomes more attractive for camera-focused buyers because of its 200MP OIS main camera, 50MP OIS telephoto and 50MP ultrawide.

The Infinix GT 50 Pro is the price champion. At the supplied 160,000 PKR, it costs substantially less than every other phone while still offering Dimensity 8400 Ultimate, 144Hz AMOLED, liquid cooling and a 6500mAh battery.

The Galaxy S26 FE is the most ecosystem-oriented option, but its supplied 8GB + 256GB configuration and higher price make it difficult to recommend as the best hardware value in this specific comparison.

Overall winner: iQOO 12.
Best performance: iQOO 12.
Best camera: OPPO Reno15 Pro.
Best display: iQOO 12.
Best battery capacity: Infinix GT 50 Pro.
Best charging: iQOO 12.
Best RAM/storage: iQOO 12.
Best budget gaming value: Infinix GT 50 Pro.
Best overall value: iQOO 12.

Ranking

RankPhonePricePerformanceCameraDisplayBatteryRAM/StorageOverall
1iQOO 12 16+512GB180K–200K10.09.09.89.010.09.6
2OPPO Reno15 Pro 12+512GB235K8.510.09.39.89.09.2
3Infinix GT 50 Pro 12+256GB160K8.87.09.510.08.28.9
4Samsung Galaxy S26 FE 8+256GB235K9.08.89.57.87.08.4

The ranking follows the requested 20% Performance + 20% Camera + 15% Display + 15% Battery + 10% RAM/Storage + 20% Value framework rather than simply ranking by AnTuTu or price.

Quick Comparison

PhoneProcessorAnTuTu v11RAM + StorageBatteryPrice
iQOO 12Snapdragon 8 Gen 32,342,74316GB + 512GB5000mAh180K–200K
Samsung Galaxy S26 FEExynos 25002,289,6968GB + 256GB4900mAh235K
OPPO Reno15 ProDimensity 84502,057,69912GB + 512GB6200mAh235K
Infinix GT 50 ProDimensity 8400 Ultimate2,137,84312GB + 256GB6500mAh160K

Against the iQOO 12’s 2,342,743 AnTuTu v11 average, the Galaxy S26 FE is 2.3% lower, Infinix GT 50 Pro is 8.7% lower, and OPPO Reno15 Pro is 12.2% lower. These are benchmark differences, not claims that the phones are exactly those percentages faster or slower in real-world use.

Regional note: the iQOO 12’s processor is unambiguous—Snapdragon 8 Gen 3—and the 16GB + 512GB configuration is officially listed. However, Pakistan retailer units can originate from different markets, so the exact imported unit’s firmware, warranty and regional network configuration should be verified separately rather than assumed.

Pros And Cons of IQOO 12

Pros of Mobile

✅ Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
✅ 144Hz AMOLED
✅ 120W Charging
✅ Periscope Zoom
✅ UFS 4.0 Storage
✅ IP64 Rating

Cons of Mobile

❌ No SD Slot
❌ No Audio Jack
❌ No Wireless Charging
❌ Average Ultrawide

Best For - Not Best For

Best For

✅ Mobile Gaming
✅ Zoom Photography
✅ Fast Charging
✅ Power Users
✅ Heavy Multitasking
✅ Content Creation

Not Best For

❌ Budget Buyers
❌ SD Card Users
❌ Wired Earphones
❌ Compact Lovers
❌ Wireless Charging
❌ Casual Users

Trailer And Unboxing of IQOO 12

Disassembly Or Teardown And Gaming Test of IQOO 12

Camera Test IQOO 12

Related Comparisions

iQOO Mobile Series

IQOO Mobile Series

FAQs Question About

IQOO 12 Specs

Picture of Faisal Ur Rehman

Faisal Ur Rehman

Faisal Rehman is the founder and editor of FSL Specs, where he publishes in-depth smartphone specifications, comparisons, buying guides, and technology insights. With extensive experience in mobile hardware research and technical analysis, he provides accurate and up-to-date information on Android smartphones, processors, displays, cameras, batteries, performance benchmarks, and software features. His goal is to simplify complex specifications and help readers choose the right device with confidence.

The iQOO 12 features a 6.78-inch LTPO AMOLED display with a 144Hz refresh rate and up to 3000 nits peak brightness for a smooth and vibrant viewing experience.

The iQOO 12 is powered by the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset paired with the Adreno 750 GPU, delivering flagship-level gaming and multitasking performance.

It comes with LPDDR5X RAM and UFS 4.0 storage, ensuring faster app loading, seamless multitasking, and high-speed file transfers.

The iQOO 12  features a 50MP + 50MP + 64MP triple rear camera setup and a 16MP front camera for detailed photos and high-quality selfies.

The phone packs a 5000mAh battery with 120W wired FlashCharge and no wireless charging.

12 + 256 GB
160,000 PKR | ₹42,000 | $480

16 + 512 GB
210,000 PKR | ₹55,000 | $630

16 + 1 TB
230,000 PKR | ₹60,000 | $700

Scroll to Top