Tecno Pova 6 4G Specs, Price, Camera, Battery & Best Review (2026)

Q: What display type does Tecno Pova 6 use, and how bright is its screen?

Tecno Pova 6 display 6.78-inch AMOLED panel with 1080 x 2460 pixel resolution and a 120Hz refresh rate. 1300 Nits Peak Brightness.

Q: Which processor is used in Tecno Pova 6?

Tecno Pova 6 runs on the MediaTek Helio G99 Ultimate built on a 6nm process, with two performance cores clocked at 2.2GHz and six efficiency cores at 2.0GHz.

Q: What RAM type and storage type does Tecno Pova 6 Use?

Tecno Pova 6 RAM is LPDDR4X, available in 8GB and 12GB configurations. Storage is UFS 2.2 at 256GB across both variants.

Q: How many megapixels are main and front cameras of Tecno Pova 6?

The rear setup is 108MP paired with a 2MP depth sensor. 32 MP Front Camera.

Q: What is battery capacity and Fast Charging of Tecno Pova 6?

Tecno pova 6 has 6000 mAh battery with 70W wired fast charging.

✪ Tecno Pova 6 4G ✪

Last Time Update : 20 October, 2026

United States

180USD

…i

Pakistan (PKR)

55000PKR

India (INR)

17500INR

Compare Mobiles

Add us as a preferred source on Google Search

✪ Tecno Pova 6 4G ✪

Quick Specs

Display: 6.78 inchAMOLED120 Hz
Processor: MediaTek Helio G992.2 GHz
RAM & Storage: 12+256 GB
Rear Camera: 108+ 2MP
Front Camera: 32 MP
Battery & Charging: 6000 mAh70 W

Full Specification

IMPORTANT INFORMATION

Specifications Disclaimer

NOTICE

Specifications are collected from official manufacturers and trusted sources. Actual details may vary by region, model variant, or software updates. We strive for accuracy but cannot guarantee error-free information.

Basic Info

Mobile: Tecno Pova 6 4G
Model: LI7
Series: Pova Series
Category: Budget
Release Date: 4 April,2024
Year: 2024

Connectivity

SIM: Dual-Nano Sims
Network: 4G / 4G+
WiFi: Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth: 5.2
NFC: Yes
OS: Android 15, HiOS 15

Body

Dimensions: 166.2 x 76.8 x 7.9 mm
Build: Plastic ( Back And Frame )
Weight: 195 g

Screen Size: 6.78 inch
Resolution: 1080 x 2460 Pixels
Type: AMOLED
Refresh Rate: 120 Hz
Peak Brightness: 1300 Nits

Processor Specs

Processor

MediaTek Helio G99

Processor Link

MediaTek Helio G99

Max Clock

2.2 GHz

Lithography

6 nm

GPU

Mali-G57 MC2

CPU Cores

8 Cores

Antutu v11

450 K

Architecture

2x Cortex-A76 @ 2.2 GHz
6x Cortex-A55 @ 2.0 GHz

RAM & ROM Specs

RAM Memory

12+256 GB

RAM Type

LPDDR4X

Storage Type

UFS 2.2

SD Card

Yes

Variants

8+256GB
12+256GB

Camera Specs

Rear Camera

108+ 2MP

Front Camera

32 MP

Recording FPS

Main Recording

2k@ 30 fps
1080@ 60 fps
720p@ 30 fps

Front Recording

2k@ 30 fps
1080@ 60 fps
720p@ 30 fps

Zoom

Digital Zoom

10 X

Stabilization

Digital

Flash

Quad Flash

Front Flash

Dual-LED Flash

Battery Specs

Capacity

6000 mAh

Fast Charging

70 W

Battery Type

Li-Po

Reverse

Reverse Wired

10 W

Other

Charging Time

50-65m ( 0% - 100%)

Other Specs

Audio & Sensors

IP Rating

ip 53

Speaker

Dual Stereo Speaker

Fingerprint Sensor

Front Finger

Other Sensors

Proximity
Gyroscope
Accelerometer
Compass
Ambient Light

Special Features

Dynamic LED light strip

BASIC INFO

Mobile

Tecno Pova 6 4G

Model

LI7

Series

Pova Series

Verify Mobile Specifications

Official information & trusted references

Official Manufacturer WebsiteExplore the original product information (opens in a new tab)

Trusted Specification Sources

Cross-reference · 6 sources

Links open third-party websites. The Purple ticks are a design marker only; they do not mean a source has verified these specifications or endorses FSL-Specs.

Last Time Update : 20 October, 2026

Highlights & Review Of Tecno Pova 6 4G

Display Highlights

The Tecno Pova 6 4G uses a 6.78-inch AMOLED display with 1080 × 2460 resolution, approximately 396 ppi, a 120Hz refresh rate, and up to 1300 nits peak brightness. Its slightly taller resolution gives it the highest pixel density in this comparison, although the difference from the rivals is too small to create a noticeable sharpness advantage in everyday use. These specifications are listed by GSMArena.

The Tecno Camon 30 4G, available at around PKR 50,000 in the used market, has a 6.78-inch AMOLED panel with 1080 × 2436 resolution, 393 ppi, and a 120Hz refresh rate. It matches the Pova 6 in panel type, screen size, and refresh rate, but its listed display brightness is not consistently specified in the available data, so the Pova 6 has the clearer brightness advantage on paper.

The Infinix Note 40 Pro 4G costs approximately PKR 55,000 used and offers the same core display format as the Camon 30, including a 6.78-inch AMOLED screen, 1080 × 2436 resolution, 393 ppi, 120Hz refresh rate, and 1300 nits peak brightness. Compared with the Pova 6, it provides almost identical sharpness and brightness, but the Pova 6 has a slightly higher pixel density because of its 2460-pixel vertical resolution.

At around PKR 53,000 used, the Infinix Zero 40 4G also features a 6.78-inch AMOLED display, 1080 × 2436 resolution, 393 ppi, 120Hz refresh rate, and up to 1300 nits HBM brightness. It therefore competes closely with the Note 40 Pro, while the Pova 6 remains marginally sharper. The available data does not provide a confirmed brightness advantage for the Zero 40 over the Pova 6 or Note 40 Pro.

Verdict: The Tecno Pova 6 4G ranks first for display specifications because it combines the highest listed pixel density with a 120Hz AMOLED panel and 1300 nits peak brightness, while the Infinix Note 40 Pro 4G and Infinix Zero 40 4G remain close alternatives and the Camon 30 4G is the least complete brightness-wise.

Performance Highlights

The Tecno Pova 6 4G uses the MediaTek Helio G99 Ultimate chipset with a 12GB RAM and 256GB storage configuration. NanoReview records an average 575,538 AnTuTu v11 score for the phone, including 210,810 CPU, 48,183 GPU, 142,611 memory, and 173,934 UX points. This places it behind the Tecno Camon 30 4G in total AnTuTu v11 performance, despite both phones using the same Helio G99 Ultimate platform.

The Tecno Camon 30 4G, priced at around PKR 50,000 in the used market, also runs on the Helio G99 Ultimate, but its average 591,209 AnTuTu v11 score is approximately 2.7% higher than the Pova 6’s score. The difference is not large enough to transform gaming performance, but it gives the Camon 30 a small advantage in heavy multitasking and benchmark ranking. Its score includes 219,188 CPU, 47,636 GPU, 159,784 memory, and 164,601 UX points

The Infinix Note 40 Pro 4G uses the same Helio G99 Ultimate family and records an average 540,239 AnTuTu v11 score. That is approximately 6.1% lower than the Pova 6 and about 8.6% lower than the Camon 30. Its 196,090 CPU score is also lower than the Pova 6’s 210,810, which gives the Tecno phone a clearer advantage for processor-heavy tasks.

The Infinix Zero 40 4G is powered by the MediaTek Helio G100 and reaches an average 504,555 AnTuTu v11 score, approximately 12.3% below the Pova 6 and 14.7% below the Camon 30. The Zero 40 is therefore the weakest performer in this four-phone comparison according to the available AnTuTu v11 results. All four results come from AnTuTu v11, making this comparison more meaningful than mixing different benchmark versions.

Verdict: The Tecno Camon 30 4G ranks first for benchmark performance, but the Tecno Pova 6 4G is the stronger overall performance value at PKR 53,000 used because it scores higher than the more expensive Note 40 Pro 4G and Zero 40 4G.

Memory & Storage Highlights

The Tecno Pova 6 4G in the targeted 12GB RAM and 256GB storage variant offers the highest physical RAM capacity in this comparison, alongside UFS 2.2 storage. It is designed for keeping more applications active in memory, while the 256GB capacity provides sufficient space for games, photos, videos, and large apps. Available specifications list the Pova 6 without a microSD card slot, so buyers cannot expand its internal storage with a memory card.

The Tecno Camon 30 4G is also available with 12GB RAM and 256GB storage, making it equal to the Pova 6 in the exact variant being compared. Its storage is listed as UFS 2.2, and the phone supports a microSD card, with several specifications sources listing expansion up to 512GB or 1TB. This gives the Camon 30 a practical advantage for users who store many offline videos, photos, documents, or large games. Tecno also advertises up to 24GB total RAM, but the additional 12GB is extended or virtual RAM, not physical RAM.

The Infinix Note 40 Pro 4G matches the Pova 6 and Camon 30 with 12GB RAM and 256GB storage in the specified used-market variant. Its storage is identified as UFS 2.2, and available specifications list microSD expansion support, reportedly up to 1TB. Therefore, the Note 40 Pro provides both high physical RAM and a storage-expansion option, which is more flexible than the Pova 6’s fixed 256GB capacity.

The Infinix Zero 40 4G has 8GB physical RAM and 256GB storage in the selected variant. Its UFS 2.2 storage is comparable in technology to the other three phones, but it has 4GB less physical RAM than the Pova 6, Camon 30, and Note 40 Pro. The Zero 40 4G is also listed without a microSD slot, leaving users dependent on its built-in storage.

Verdict: The Tecno Camon 30 4G and Infinix Note 40 Pro 4G offer the best RAM and memory flexibility because they combine 12GB RAM, 256GB UFS 2.2 storage, and microSD expansion. The Tecno Pova 6 4G wins for physical RAM but loses on storage expansion, while the Infinix Zero 40 4G ranks last with 8GB RAM and no confirmed microSD support.

Camera Highlights

The Tecno Pova 6 4G has a 108MP main camera with PDAF and a 2MP auxiliary sensor. Its rear camera records up to 2K at 30fps, 1080p at 60fps, 1080p at 30fps, and 720p at 30fps. The 32MP selfie camera offers the same listed recording modes, including 2K at 30fps and 1080p at 60fps, giving the Pova 6 one of the strongest front-camera video specifications in this comparison. Tecno’s official specification page confirms these frame-rate options.

At approximately PKR 50,000 in the used market, the Tecno Camon 30 4G takes a different approach with a 50MP primary camera, a large 1/1.57-inch sensor, PDAF, and OIS. Its main camera records up to 1440p at 30fps and 1080p at 60fps, while the 50MP autofocus selfie camera is listed with 1440p at 30fps and 1080p at 60fps recording. The Camon 30 therefore has lower main-camera resolution than the Pova 6, but its OIS, larger sensor, and autofocus front camera are more important for stable photos and more dependable selfie focusing.

The Infinix Note 40 Pro 4G, priced at around PKR 55,000 used, includes a 108MP main camera with PDAF and OIS, supported by two 2MP auxiliary cameras. Its rear camera records 1440p at 30fps, 1080p at 60fps, and 1080p at 30fps. The 32MP front camera is limited to 1080p at 30fps, so the Pova 6 offers higher-resolution and higher-frame-rate selfie recording. The Note 40 Pro’s OIS remains useful for reducing shake in handheld rear-camera footage.

The Infinix Zero 40 4G, available at about PKR 53,000 used, has a 108MP OIS main camera, a 50MP ultrawide camera, and a 2MP depth sensor. Its rear camera supports 1440p at 30fps, 1080p at 60fps, and 1080p at 30fps, with OIS and gyro-EIS listed. The 50MP selfie camera is listed at 1080p up to 30fps in the available specifications, although some secondary listings report different modes, so the front-video specification should be treated with lower confidence.

Verdict: The Tecno Camon 30 4G is the strongest camera-quality choice because of its large sensor, OIS, and autofocus selfie camera, while the Tecno Pova 6 4G wins for video flexibility with 2K recording on both rear and front cameras plus 1080p at 60fps. The Note 40 Pro 4G and Zero 40 4G offer OIS, but their selfie-video limits make them less versatile for vlog-style recording.

Battery & Charging Highlights

The Tecno Pova 6 4G has the largest battery in this comparison, with a 6000mAh cell and 70W wired charging. Available specifications list approximately 50% charging in 20 minutes, full charging in about 50 minutes, and 10W reverse wired charging. Its 1000mAh capacity advantage over the three rivals gives it the strongest endurance potential, especially for gaming, video playback, and extended mobile data use. cite

The Tecno Camon 30 4G, priced at about PKR 50,000 in the used market, carries a 5000mAh battery with 70W wired charging. It matches the Pova 6’s charging wattage, but the smaller battery means it cannot offer the same capacity reserve. The Camon 30 is a strong choice for buyers who prioritise faster top-ups, although the exact 0-to-100% charging time for the 4G model is not consistently confirmed across the available sources

The Infinix Note 40 Pro 4G costs approximately PKR 55,000 used and includes a 5000mAh battery, 45W wired charging, and 20W wireless MagCharge. Its advertised wired charging rate reaches 50% in around 26 minutes. Wireless charging and reverse charging are important differentiators because neither the Pova 6 nor the Camon 30 provides the same confirmed wireless-charging convenience. However, the Note 40 Pro charges more slowly by cable than both Tecno phones

The Infinix Zero 40 4G, available at roughly PKR 53,000 used, has a 5000mAh battery with 45W wired charging, advertised at approximately 50% in 25 minutes. It also supports 10W reverse wired charging and Bypass Charging 2.0, which can direct power toward the phone during gaming instead of continuously stressing the battery. Its capacity is equal to the Camon 30 and Note 40 Pro, but its charging speed is slower than the 70W options

Verdict: The Tecno Pova 6 4G wins the battery category with a 6000mAh battery, 70W charging, and 10W reverse charging. The Tecno Camon 30 4G is the best alternative for fast wired charging, while the Infinix Note 40 Pro 4G is the most versatile because of 20W wireless charging, and the Zero 40 4G adds useful bypass charging at a lower wired speed.

Final Verdict

For the selected 12GB + 256GB Tecno Pova 6 4G variant, the strongest overall choice at the listed PKR 53,000 used-market price is the Tecno Pova 6 4G. It combines the largest 6000mAh battery, 70W wired charging, 12GB RAM, 256GB storage, a 120Hz AMOLED display, and a strong average 575,538 AnTuTu v11 score. Its main weaknesses are the lack of OIS, no confirmed microSD expansion, and a camera system that is less photography-focused than the Camon 30 4G. cite cite cite

The Tecno Camon 30 4G is the best alternative at around PKR 50,000 used. It delivers the highest average AnTuTu v11 score at 591,209, a large 50MP camera sensor with OIS, an autofocus selfie camera, 12GB RAM, and 256GB storage. It has a smaller 5000mAh battery, but its camera hardware is more useful for photography and stable handheld video. cite cite

The Infinix Note 40 Pro 4G remains attractive at approximately PKR 55,000 used because it offers OIS and 20W wireless charging alongside 12GB RAM and 256GB UFS 2.2 storage. However, its 540,239 AnTuTu v11 score is lower than both Tecno models, while its 5000mAh battery and 70W wired charging do not match the Pova 6’s 6000mAh endurance advantage. cite cite cite

The Infinix Zero 40 4G costs about PKR 53,000 used and has useful camera hardware, including a 108MP OIS main camera, 50MP ultrawide camera, and 45W charging. However, the selected model has only 8GB RAM, its average 504,555 AnTuTu v11 score is the lowest here, and its 5000mAh battery does not compensate for the performance gap. cite cite

Bottom line: The Tecno Pova 6 4G is the best overall buy for battery life, RAM capacity, charging speed, and balanced performance. Choose the Tecno Camon 30 4G for camera quality, or the Infinix Note 40 Pro 4G if wireless charging is more important than maximum battery capacity and benchmark performance.