✪ Tecno Pova 6 4G ✪

Tecno Pova 6 4G Specs
United States flag United States
$190 USD
Pakistan flag Pakistan (PKR)
55,000 PKR
India flag India (INR)
₹17,000 INR

✪ Tecno Pova 6 4G ✪

Tecno Pova 6 4G Specs
Last Time Update : 18 September, 2026
0

Quick Specifications

AMOLED

Display Type

MediaTek Helio G99

Processor

12+256 GB

Ram And Memory

108+ 2MP

Camera

6000 mAh

Battery

70 W

Fast Charging

Full Specification

BASIC INFO
Mobile
Tecno Pova 6 4G
Model
LI7
Series
Pova Series
Category
Budget
Release Date
4 April,2024
Year
2024
CONNECTIVITY
Sim
Dual-Nano Sims
Network
4G / 4G+
WiFi
Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac)
Bluetooth
5.2
NFC
Yes
OS
Android 15, HiOS 15
BODY
Dimensions
166.2 x 76.8 x 7.9 mm
Build
Plastic ( Back And Frame )
KG Weight
195 g
Screen Size
6.78 inch
Resolution
1080 x 2460 Pixels
Type
AMOLED
Refresh Rate
120 Hz
Peak Brightness
1300 Nits
HBM Brightness
-
Processor
MediaTek Helio G99
Max Clock
2.2 GHz
Lithography
6 nm
GPU
Mali-G57 MC2
CPU Cores
8 Cores
Antutu v11
450 K
Bootup Time
-
Architecture
2x Cortex-A76 @ 2.2 GHz
6x Cortex-A55 @ 2.0 GHz
Ram Memory
12+256 GB
Ram Type
LPDDR4X
Storage Type
UFS 2.2
SD Card
Yes
Variants
8+256GB
12+256GB
MP
Rear Camera
108+ 2MP
Front Camera
32 MP
SENSORS
Camera Sensors
Front Sensors
RECORDING FPS
Main Recording
2k@ 30 fps
1080@ 60 fps
720p@ 30 fps
Front Recording
2k@ 30 fps
1080@ 60 fps
720p@ 30 fps
RESOLUTION
Main Resolution
12000 x 9000 Pixels
Front Resolution
6528 × 4896 pixels
ZOOM
Optical Zoom
-
D Digital Zoom
10 X
FLASH
Flash
Quad Flash
Front Flash
Dual-LED Flash
Capacity
6000 mAh
Fast Charging
70 W
Wireless Charging
No
Li Battery Type
Li-Po
REVERSE
Reverse Wired
10 W
Reverse Wireless
No
OTHER
Battery PC Marks
-
Charging Time
50-65m ( 0% - 100%)
AUDIO & SENSORS
Speaker
Dual Stereo Speaker
Fingerprint Sensor
Front Finger
Other Sensors
Proximity
Gyroscope
Accelerometer
Compass
Ambient Light
Special Features

Dynamic LED light strip

BASIC INFO
Mobile
Tecno Pova 6 4G
Model
LI7
Series
Pova Series
Category
Budget
Release Date
4 April,2024
Year
2024
CONNECTIVITY
Sim
Dual-Nano Sims
Network
4G / 4G+
WiFi
Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac)
Bluetooth
5.2
NFC
Yes
OS
Android 15, HiOS 15
BODY
Dimensions
166.2 x 76.8 x 7.9 mm
Build
Plastic ( Back And Frame )
KG Weight
195 g
Screen Size
6.78 inch
Resolution
1080 x 2460 Pixels
Type
AMOLED
Refresh Rate
120 Hz
Peak Brightness
1300 Nits
HBM Brightness
-
Processor
MediaTek Helio G99
Max Clock
2.2 GHz
Lithography
6 nm
GPU
Mali-G57 MC2
CPU Cores
8 Cores
Antutu v11
450 K
Bootup Time
-
Architecture
2x Cortex-A76 @ 2.2 GHz
6x Cortex-A55 @ 2.0 GHz
Ram Memory
12+256 GB
SD Card
Yes
Ram Type
LPDDR4X
Storage Type
UFS 2.2
Variants
8+256GB
12+256GB
MP
Rear Camera
108+ 2MP
Front Camera
32 MP
SENSORS
Main Camera Sensors
Front Camera Sensors
RECORDING FPS
Main Recording
2k@ 30 fps
1080@ 60 fps
720p@ 30 fps
Front Recording
2k@ 30 fps
1080@ 60 fps
720p@ 30 fps
RESOLUTION
Main Resolution
12000 x 9000 Pixels
Front Resolution
6528 × 4896 pixels
ZOOM
Optical Zoom
-
D Digital Zoom
10 X
FLASH
Flash
Quad Flash
Front Flash
Dual-LED Flash
Capacity
6000 mAh
Fast Charging
70 W
Wireless Charging
No
Li Battery Type
Li-Po
REVERSE
Reverse Wired
10 W
Reverse Wireless
No
OTHER
Battery Life PCMark
-
Charging Time
50-65m ( 0% - 100%)
AUDIO & SENSORS
Speaker
Dual Stereo Speaker
Fingerprint Sensor
Front Finger
Other Sensors
Proximity
Gyroscope
Accelerometer
Compass
Ambient Light
Special Features

Dynamic LED light strip

Highlights & Review Of Tecno Pova 6 4G

Display Review:

The Tecno Pova 6 4G uses a 6.78-inch AMOLED display with 1080 × 2460 resolution, approximately 396 ppi, a 120Hz refresh rate, and up to 1300 nits peak brightness. Its slightly taller resolution gives it the highest pixel density in this comparison, although the difference from the rivals is too small to create a noticeable sharpness advantage in everyday use. These specifications are listed by GSMArena.

The Tecno Camon 30 4G, available at around PKR 50,000 in the used market, has a 6.78-inch AMOLED panel with 1080 × 2436 resolution, 393 ppi, and a 120Hz refresh rate. It matches the Pova 6 in panel type, screen size, and refresh rate, but its listed display brightness is not consistently specified in the available data, so the Pova 6 has the clearer brightness advantage on paper.

The Infinix Note 40 Pro 4G costs approximately PKR 55,000 used and offers the same core display format as the Camon 30, including a 6.78-inch AMOLED screen, 1080 × 2436 resolution, 393 ppi, 120Hz refresh rate, and 1300 nits peak brightness. Compared with the Pova 6, it provides almost identical sharpness and brightness, but the Pova 6 has a slightly higher pixel density because of its 2460-pixel vertical resolution.

At around PKR 53,000 used, the Infinix Zero 40 4G also features a 6.78-inch AMOLED display, 1080 × 2436 resolution, 393 ppi, 120Hz refresh rate, and up to 1300 nits HBM brightness. It therefore competes closely with the Note 40 Pro, while the Pova 6 remains marginally sharper. The available data does not provide a confirmed brightness advantage for the Zero 40 over the Pova 6 or Note 40 Pro.

Verdict: The Tecno Pova 6 4G ranks first for display specifications because it combines the highest listed pixel density with a 120Hz AMOLED panel and 1300 nits peak brightness, while the Infinix Note 40 Pro 4G and Infinix Zero 40 4G remain close alternatives and the Camon 30 4G is the least complete brightness-wise.

Processor Review:

The Tecno Pova 6 4G uses the MediaTek Helio G99 Ultimate chipset with a 12GB RAM and 256GB storage configuration. NanoReview records an average 575,538 AnTuTu v11 score for the phone, including 210,810 CPU, 48,183 GPU, 142,611 memory, and 173,934 UX points. This places it behind the Tecno Camon 30 4G in total AnTuTu v11 performance, despite both phones using the same Helio G99 Ultimate platform.

The Tecno Camon 30 4G, priced at around PKR 50,000 in the used market, also runs on the Helio G99 Ultimate, but its average 591,209 AnTuTu v11 score is approximately 2.7% higher than the Pova 6’s score. The difference is not large enough to transform gaming performance, but it gives the Camon 30 a small advantage in heavy multitasking and benchmark ranking. Its score includes 219,188 CPU, 47,636 GPU, 159,784 memory, and 164,601 UX points

The Infinix Note 40 Pro 4G uses the same Helio G99 Ultimate family and records an average 540,239 AnTuTu v11 score. That is approximately 6.1% lower than the Pova 6 and about 8.6% lower than the Camon 30. Its 196,090 CPU score is also lower than the Pova 6’s 210,810, which gives the Tecno phone a clearer advantage for processor-heavy tasks.

The Infinix Zero 40 4G is powered by the MediaTek Helio G100 and reaches an average 504,555 AnTuTu v11 score, approximately 12.3% below the Pova 6 and 14.7% below the Camon 30. The Zero 40 is therefore the weakest performer in this four-phone comparison according to the available AnTuTu v11 results. All four results come from AnTuTu v11, making this comparison more meaningful than mixing different benchmark versions.

Verdict: The Tecno Camon 30 4G ranks first for benchmark performance, but the Tecno Pova 6 4G is the stronger overall performance value at PKR 53,000 used because it scores higher than the more expensive Note 40 Pro 4G and Zero 40 4G.

Ram & Memory Review:

The Tecno Pova 6 4G in the targeted 12GB RAM and 256GB storage variant offers the highest physical RAM capacity in this comparison, alongside UFS 2.2 storage. It is designed for keeping more applications active in memory, while the 256GB capacity provides sufficient space for games, photos, videos, and large apps. Available specifications list the Pova 6 without a microSD card slot, so buyers cannot expand its internal storage with a memory card.

The Tecno Camon 30 4G is also available with 12GB RAM and 256GB storage, making it equal to the Pova 6 in the exact variant being compared. Its storage is listed as UFS 2.2, and the phone supports a microSD card, with several specifications sources listing expansion up to 512GB or 1TB. This gives the Camon 30 a practical advantage for users who store many offline videos, photos, documents, or large games. Tecno also advertises up to 24GB total RAM, but the additional 12GB is extended or virtual RAM, not physical RAM.

The Infinix Note 40 Pro 4G matches the Pova 6 and Camon 30 with 12GB RAM and 256GB storage in the specified used-market variant. Its storage is identified as UFS 2.2, and available specifications list microSD expansion support, reportedly up to 1TB. Therefore, the Note 40 Pro provides both high physical RAM and a storage-expansion option, which is more flexible than the Pova 6’s fixed 256GB capacity.

The Infinix Zero 40 4G has 8GB physical RAM and 256GB storage in the selected variant. Its UFS 2.2 storage is comparable in technology to the other three phones, but it has 4GB less physical RAM than the Pova 6, Camon 30, and Note 40 Pro. The Zero 40 4G is also listed without a microSD slot, leaving users dependent on its built-in storage.

Verdict: The Tecno Camon 30 4G and Infinix Note 40 Pro 4G offer the best RAM and memory flexibility because they combine 12GB RAM, 256GB UFS 2.2 storage, and microSD expansion. The Tecno Pova 6 4G wins for physical RAM but loses on storage expansion, while the Infinix Zero 40 4G ranks last with 8GB RAM and no confirmed microSD support.

Cameras Review:

The Tecno Pova 6 4G has a 108MP main camera with PDAF and a 2MP auxiliary sensor. Its rear camera records up to 2K at 30fps, 1080p at 60fps, 1080p at 30fps, and 720p at 30fps. The 32MP selfie camera offers the same listed recording modes, including 2K at 30fps and 1080p at 60fps, giving the Pova 6 one of the strongest front-camera video specifications in this comparison. Tecno’s official specification page confirms these frame-rate options.

At approximately PKR 50,000 in the used market, the Tecno Camon 30 4G takes a different approach with a 50MP primary camera, a large 1/1.57-inch sensor, PDAF, and OIS. Its main camera records up to 1440p at 30fps and 1080p at 60fps, while the 50MP autofocus selfie camera is listed with 1440p at 30fps and 1080p at 60fps recording. The Camon 30 therefore has lower main-camera resolution than the Pova 6, but its OIS, larger sensor, and autofocus front camera are more important for stable photos and more dependable selfie focusing.

The Infinix Note 40 Pro 4G, priced at around PKR 55,000 used, includes a 108MP main camera with PDAF and OIS, supported by two 2MP auxiliary cameras. Its rear camera records 1440p at 30fps, 1080p at 60fps, and 1080p at 30fps. The 32MP front camera is limited to 1080p at 30fps, so the Pova 6 offers higher-resolution and higher-frame-rate selfie recording. The Note 40 Pro’s OIS remains useful for reducing shake in handheld rear-camera footage.

The Infinix Zero 40 4G, available at about PKR 53,000 used, has a 108MP OIS main camera, a 50MP ultrawide camera, and a 2MP depth sensor. Its rear camera supports 1440p at 30fps, 1080p at 60fps, and 1080p at 30fps, with OIS and gyro-EIS listed. The 50MP selfie camera is listed at 1080p up to 30fps in the available specifications, although some secondary listings report different modes, so the front-video specification should be treated with lower confidence.

Verdict: The Tecno Camon 30 4G is the strongest camera-quality choice because of its large sensor, OIS, and autofocus selfie camera, while the Tecno Pova 6 4G wins for video flexibility with 2K recording on both rear and front cameras plus 1080p at 60fps. The Note 40 Pro 4G and Zero 40 4G offer OIS, but their selfie-video limits make them less versatile for vlog-style recording.

Battery Review:

The Tecno Pova 6 4G has the largest battery in this comparison, with a 6000mAh cell and 70W wired charging. Available specifications list approximately 50% charging in 20 minutes, full charging in about 50 minutes, and 10W reverse wired charging. Its 1000mAh capacity advantage over the three rivals gives it the strongest endurance potential, especially for gaming, video playback, and extended mobile data use. cite

The Tecno Camon 30 4G, priced at about PKR 50,000 in the used market, carries a 5000mAh battery with 70W wired charging. It matches the Pova 6’s charging wattage, but the smaller battery means it cannot offer the same capacity reserve. The Camon 30 is a strong choice for buyers who prioritise faster top-ups, although the exact 0-to-100% charging time for the 4G model is not consistently confirmed across the available sources

The Infinix Note 40 Pro 4G costs approximately PKR 55,000 used and includes a 5000mAh battery, 45W wired charging, and 20W wireless MagCharge. Its advertised wired charging rate reaches 50% in around 26 minutes. Wireless charging and reverse charging are important differentiators because neither the Pova 6 nor the Camon 30 provides the same confirmed wireless-charging convenience. However, the Note 40 Pro charges more slowly by cable than both Tecno phones

The Infinix Zero 40 4G, available at roughly PKR 53,000 used, has a 5000mAh battery with 45W wired charging, advertised at approximately 50% in 25 minutes. It also supports 10W reverse wired charging and Bypass Charging 2.0, which can direct power toward the phone during gaming instead of continuously stressing the battery. Its capacity is equal to the Camon 30 and Note 40 Pro, but its charging speed is slower than the 70W options

Verdict: The Tecno Pova 6 4G wins the battery category with a 6000mAh battery, 70W charging, and 10W reverse charging. The Tecno Camon 30 4G is the best alternative for fast wired charging, while the Infinix Note 40 Pro 4G is the most versatile because of 20W wireless charging, and the Zero 40 4G adds useful bypass charging at a lower wired speed.

Final Verdict :

For the selected 12GB + 256GB Tecno Pova 6 4G variant, the strongest overall choice at the listed PKR 53,000 used-market price is the Tecno Pova 6 4G. It combines the largest 6000mAh battery, 70W wired charging, 12GB RAM, 256GB storage, a 120Hz AMOLED display, and a strong average 575,538 AnTuTu v11 score. Its main weaknesses are the lack of OIS, no confirmed microSD expansion, and a camera system that is less photography-focused than the Camon 30 4G. cite cite cite

The Tecno Camon 30 4G is the best alternative at around PKR 50,000 used. It delivers the highest average AnTuTu v11 score at 591,209, a large 50MP camera sensor with OIS, an autofocus selfie camera, 12GB RAM, and 256GB storage. It has a smaller 5000mAh battery, but its camera hardware is more useful for photography and stable handheld video. cite cite

The Infinix Note 40 Pro 4G remains attractive at approximately PKR 55,000 used because it offers OIS and 20W wireless charging alongside 12GB RAM and 256GB UFS 2.2 storage. However, its 540,239 AnTuTu v11 score is lower than both Tecno models, while its 5000mAh battery and 70W wired charging do not match the Pova 6’s 6000mAh endurance advantage. cite cite cite

The Infinix Zero 40 4G costs about PKR 53,000 used and has useful camera hardware, including a 108MP OIS main camera, 50MP ultrawide camera, and 45W charging. However, the selected model has only 8GB RAM, its average 504,555 AnTuTu v11 score is the lowest here, and its 5000mAh battery does not compensate for the performance gap. cite cite

Bottom line: The Tecno Pova 6 4G is the best overall buy for battery life, RAM capacity, charging speed, and balanced performance. Choose the Tecno Camon 30 4G for camera quality, or the Infinix Note 40 Pro 4G if wireless charging is more important than maximum battery capacity and benchmark performance.

Ranking:

  1. Tecno Pova 6 4G, 12GB + 256GB – PKR 53,000, used market

  2. Tecno Camon 30 4G, 12GB + 256GB – PKR 50,000, used market

  3. Infinix Note 40 Pro 4G, 12GB + 256GB – PKR 55,000, used market

  4. Infinix Zero 40 4G, 8GB + 256GB – PKR 53,000, used market

Pros And Cons of Tecno Pova 6 4G

Pros of Mobile

✅ 6000 mAh battery
✅70W fast charge
✅120Hz AMOLED display
✅108MP rear camera
✅NFC + IR blaster
✅Stereo Dolby speakers

Cons of Mobile

❌ No 5G support
❌No OIS camera
❌No microSD slot
❌Occasional system lag

Best For - Not Best For

Best For

✅ Students
✅ All-day battery
✅ Casual gamers
✅ Multimedia lovers
✅ Budget buyers
✅ First smartphone users
✅ Daily social media

Not Best For

❌ Mobile photographers
❌5G network users
❌Pro photographers
❌Heavy gamers
❌Video creators
❌Premium feel seekers

 

Trailer And Unboxing of Tecno Pova 6 4G

Disassembly Or Teardown And Gaming Test of Tecno Pova 6 4G

Camera Test Tecno Pova 6 4G

Tecno Pova 7 4G
Tecno Camon 30 4G
Infinix Note 40 Pro 4G
Redmi Note 14 4G
Infinix Zero 40 4G
Tecno Pova 6 Neo
Tecno Pova 5 Pro

Comparisions

Tecno Pova 6 4G vs Tecno Pova 7 4G
Tecno Pova 6 4G vs Tecno Camon 30 4G
Tecno Pova 6 4G vs Infinix Note 40 Pro 4G
Tecno Pova 6 4G vs Infinix Zero 40 4G
Tecno Pova 6 4G vs Tecno Pova 6 Neo 4G

TECNO Series Row
Picture of Faisal Ur Rehman

Faisal Ur Rehman

Faisal Rehman is the founder and editor of FSL Specs, where he publishes in-depth smartphone specifications, comparisons, buying guides, and technology insights. With extensive experience in mobile hardware research and technical analysis, he provides accurate and up-to-date information on Android smartphones, processors, displays, cameras, batteries, performance benchmarks, and software features. His goal is to simplify complex specifications and help readers choose the right device with confidence.

FAQs Questions

Tecno Pova 6 display 6.78-inch AMOLED panel with 1080 x 2460 pixel resolution and a 120Hz refresh rate. 1300 Nits Peak Brightness.

Tecno Pova 6 runs on the MediaTek Helio G99 Ultimate built on a 6nm process, with two performance cores clocked at 2.2GHz and six efficiency cores at 2.0GHz.

Tecno Pova 6 RAM is LPDDR4X, available in 8GB and 12GB configurations. Storage is UFS 2.2 at 256GB across both variants.

The rear setup is 108MP paired with a 2MP depth sensor. 32 MP Front Camera.

Tecno pova 6 has 6000 mAh battery with 70W wired fast charging.

8+256GB = ?


12+256GB = ~55,000 PKR | ~190 $ | ~17,000 PKR

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top