✪ vivo V80 ✪

Vivo V80
Last Time Update : 7 November, 2026
United States flagUnited States
850USD
…iPrice NoteYour Country price depends on USD. Prices may be different in your region due to taxes and duties.
Pakistan flagPakistan (PKR)
250000PKR
India flagIndia (INR)
80000INR

Price Updated: 7 November, 2026

✪ vivo V80 ✪

Vivo V80
Quick Specs
Display
6.59 inchAmoled144 Hz
Processor
Snapdragon 7 Gen 42.8 GHz
RAM & Storage
8 + 512 GB
Rear Camera
50 + 50 + 8 MP
Front Camera
50 MP
Battery & Charging
7200 mAh90 W

Full Specification

!
IMPORTANT INFORMATION

Specifications Disclaimer

NOTICE

Specifications are collected from official manufacturers and trusted sources. Actual details may vary by region, model variant, or software updates. We strive for accuracy but cannot guarantee error-free information.

Basic Info

Mobile
vivo V80
Model
V2648
Series
Vivo V Series
Category
Mid-range
Release Date
13 October,2026
Year
2026

Connectivity

SIM
Nano-SIM / E-Sim
Network
4G / 4G+ / 5G
WiFi
Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth
5.4
NFC
Yes
OS
Android 17

Body

Dimensions
157.5 x 74.3 x 7.7 mm
Build
Aluminum Frame, Glass Back
Weight
203 g
Screen Size
6.59 inch
Resolution
1260 x 2750 Pixels
Type
Amoled
Refresh Rate
144 Hz
Peak Brightness
5000 nits
HBM Brightness
1800 nits
Processor Specs
Processor
Snapdragon 7 Gen 4
Max Clock
2.8 GHz
Lithography
4 nm
GPU
Adreno 722
CPU Cores
8 Cores
Antutu v11
1.4 M
Antutu v10
1.01 M
Bootup Time
27 s
Architecture
1×2.8 GHz Cortex-A720
4×2.4 GHz Cortex-A720
3×1.8 GHz Cortex-A520
RAM & ROM Specs
RAM Memory
8 + 512 GB
RAM Type
LPDDR5X
Storage Type
UFS 4.1
SD Card
No
Variants
8 + 128 / 256 / 512 GB
Camera Specs
MP
Rear Camera
50 + 50 + 8 MP
Front Camera
50 MP
Sensors
Camera Sensors
50 MP = Sony LYT-700C
50 MP = Sony IMX882
  8 MP =Not confirm
Recording FPS
Main Recording
4K @ 30/60 fps
1080p @30/60 fps
Front Recording
4K @ 30 fps
1080p @ 30/60fps
Zoom
Optical Zoom
3 x
Digital Zoom
100 x
Stabilization
Optical
Flash
Flash
Ring Light
Front Flash
Screen Flash
Battery Specs
Capacity
7200 mAh
Fast Charging
90 W
Battery Type
Silicon-Carbon
Reverse
Reverse Wired
Yes
Reverse Wireless
No
Other
Battery PC Marks
18h 30m
Charging Time
100 Mints (0% To 100%)
Other Specs
Audio & Sensors
IP Rating
IP68 / IP69
Speaker
Dual Stereo Speaker
Fingerprint Sensor
Front Finger
Other Sensors
Accelerometer
Gyroscope
Proximity
Compass
etc
BASIC INFO
Mobile
vivo V80
Model
V2648
Series
Vivo V Series
Category
Mid-range
Release Date
13 October,2026
Year
2026
CONNECTIVITY
Sim
Nano-SIM / E-Sim
Network
4G / 4G+ / 5G
WiFi
Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth
5.4
NFC
Yes
OS
Android 17
BODY
Dimensions
157.5 x 74.3 x 7.7 mm
Build
Aluminum Frame, Glass Back
Weight
203 g
Screen Size
6.59 inch
Resolution
1260 x 2750 Pixels
Type
Amoled
Refresh Rate
144 Hz
Peak Brightness
5000 nits
HBM Brightness
1800 nits
Processor
Snapdragon 7 Gen 4
Max Clock
2.8 GHz
Lithography
4 nm
GPU
Adreno 722
CPU Cores
8 Cores
Antutu v11
1.4 M
Antutu v10
1.01 M
Bootup Time
27 s
Architecture
1×2.8 GHz Cortex-A720
4×2.4 GHz Cortex-A720
3×1.8 GHz Cortex-A520
Ram Memory
8 + 512 GB
SD Card
No
Ram Type
LPDDR5X
Storage Type
UFS 4.1
Variants
8 + 128 / 256 / 512 GB
MP
Rear Camera
50 + 50 + 8 MP
Front Camera
50 MP
SENSORS
Main Camera Sensors
50 MP = Sony LYT-700C
50 MP = Sony IMX882
  8 MP =Not confirm
RECORDING FPS
Main Recording
4K @ 30/60 fps
1080p @30/60 fps
Front Recording
4K @ 30 fps
1080p @ 30/60fps
RESOLUTION
Main Resolution
8160 × 6144 pixels
Front Resolution
8192 x 6144 Pixels
ZOOM
Optical Zoom
3 x
Digital Zoom
100 x
Stabilization
Optical
FLASH
Flash
Ring Light
Front Flash
Screen Flash
Capacity
7200 mAh
Fast Charging
90 W
Battery Type
Silicon-Carbon
REVERSE
Reverse Wired
Yes
Reverse Wireless
No
OTHER
Battery Life PCMark
18h 30m
Charging Time
100 Mints (0% To 100%)
PROTECTION
IP Rating
IP68 / IP69
AUDIO & SENSORS
Speaker
Dual Stereo Speaker
Fingerprint Sensor
Front Finger
Other Sensors
Accelerometer Gyroscope Proximity Compass etc

Verify Mobile Specifications

Official information & trusted references

Official Manufacturer WebsiteExplore the original product information (opens in a new tab)

Trusted Specification Sources

Cross-reference · 5 sources

Links open third-party websites. The Purple ticks are a design marker only; they do not mean a source has verified these specifications or endorses FSL-Specs.

Last Time Update : 7 November, 2026

Highlights & Review Of vivo V80

Display Highlights

Display Highlights

The vivo V80 has a 6.59-inch AMOLED panel at 1260 x 2750 pixels with a 144 Hz refresh rate, 5000 nits peak brightness and 1800 nits HBM. It is the only phone here that combines 144 Hz with 5000 nits peak brightness. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also runs at 144 Hz on a 6.7-inch P-OLED, but it reaches only 2500 nits peak and 1500 nits HBM.

The Xiaomi 17T has a 6.59-inch AMOLED at 120 Hz, with 3500 nits peak and the highest HBM in the group at 2000 nits. The Vivo X300 FE matches the V80 on peak brightness at 5000 nits and lists a similar HBM of ~1800 nits, which is approximate in its listing.

Peak and HBM are different measurements, so the two columns should be read separately. Peak brightness usually applies to small bright areas in HDR content, while HBM reflects sunlight visibility. For outdoor use, the Xiaomi 17T has the strongest listed HBM at 2000 nits, ahead of the V80 by 200 nits.

Sharpness separates the phones too. The X300 FE leads at 1440 x 3168 pixels on a smaller 6.31-inch panel, about 551 PPI, and it is the only phone here that lists LTPO. The Xiaomi 17T (~460 PPI) and V80 (~459 PPI) are effectively equal, and the Edge 50 Ultra is lowest at ~444 PPI. The X300 FE also gives up 144 Hz, topping out at 120 Hz, the same as the Xiaomi 17T.

Prices are retailer quotes from 31 October 2026. The vivo V80 costs ~PKR 240,000 new, the Edge 50 Ultra PKR 185,000, the Xiaomi 17T PKR 218,000 and the X300 FE PKR 250,000.

PhoneSizeResolutionPanelRefresh RatePeak BrightnessHBM Brightness
vivo V806.59-inch1260 x 2750AMOLED144 Hz5000 nits1800 nits
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra6.7-inch1220 x 2712P-OLED144 Hz2500 nits1500 nits
Xiaomi 17T6.59-inch1268 x 2756AMOLED120 Hz3500 nits2000 nits
Vivo X300 FE6.31-inch1440 x 3168LTPO AMOLED120 Hz5000 nits~1800 nits

Verdict: The Vivo X300 FE has the best display on paper, with 1440 x 3168 resolution, LTPO and 5000 nits peak at PKR 250,000. The vivo V80 is a close second at ~PKR 240,000, with the same 5000 nits peak and a faster 144 Hz panel. The Xiaomi 17T is the better value for outdoor visibility, with 2000 nits HBM at PKR 218,000, which is about PKR 22,000 less than the V80.

Performance Highlights

Performance Highlights

The vivo V80 scores 1.4M AnTuTu (v11) on its Snapdragon 7 Gen 4, the lowest in this group. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is only slightly ahead at 1.5M on the Snapdragon 8s Gen 3. The Xiaomi 17T reaches 2.4M on the Dimensity 8500 Ultra, and the Vivo X300 FE leads at 2.9M on the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, roughly double the V80. All four phones have a v11 result, so v11 is the fair four-way comparison. A v10 score exists only for the V80 (1.01M) and the Xiaomi 17T (1.7M), so v10 cannot rank the Edge 50 Ultra or X300 FE.

The V80’s 2.8 GHz peak clock and 4 nm process trail the Xiaomi 17T’s 3.4 GHz on 4 nm and the X300 FE’s 3.8 GHz on 3 nm. The V80 pairs one Cortex-A720 at 2.8 GHz and four at 2.4 GHz with three Cortex-A520 cores, and its GPU is an Adreno 722.

The Edge 50 Ultra pairs a 3.0 GHz prime core with an Adreno 735 GPU, one step above the V80’s Adreno 722. Its prime core type is not named in the listing. The Xiaomi 17T runs eight Cortex-A725 cores with a Mali-G720 MC8 GPU, and the X300 FE has an Adreno 829.

Boot time is listed for three phones. The Xiaomi 17T boots in 18 s, the Edge 50 Ultra in 22 s and the V80 in 27 s. The X300 FE lists no boot time.

Prices are retailer quotes from 31 October 2026. The V80 costs ~PKR 240,000 new. The Edge 50 Ultra is PKR 185,000, which is PKR 55,000 less for 100K more points. The Xiaomi 17T is PKR 218,000, which is PKR 22,000 less for 1.0M more. The X300 FE is PKR 250,000, only about PKR 10,000 more for 1.5M more.

PhoneProcessorProcessGPUMax ClockAnTuTu v11AnTuTu v10Boot TimePrice (PKR, new)
vivo V80Snapdragon 7 Gen 44 nmAdreno 7222.8 GHz1.4M1.01M27 s~240,000
Motorola Edge 50 UltraSnapdragon 8s Gen 34 nmAdreno 7353.0 GHz1.5MNot listed22 s185,000
Xiaomi 17TDimensity 8500 Ultra4 nmMali-G720 MC8 / MP83.4 GHz2.4M1.7M18 s218,000
Vivo X300 FESnapdragon 8 Elite Gen 53 nmAdreno 8293.8 GHz2.9MNot listedNot listed250,000

Verdict: The Vivo X300 FE is the fastest phone here at 2.9M AnTuTu (v11) and costs only about PKR 10,000 more than the vivo V80. The Xiaomi 17T is the best performance value at 2.4M and PKR 218,000. The vivo V80 is the weakest performer at 1.4M, so it only makes sense for buyers who prioritize its other features over raw speed.

Memory & Storage Highlights

Memory & Storage Highlights

The vivo V80 (8 + 256 GB) pairs 8 GB LPDDR5X RAM with 256 GB UFS 4.1 storage and has no microSD slot. It has the least RAM in this group. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra (16 + 1TB) has 16 GB LPDDR5X and 1TB UFS 4.0, which is twice the V80’s RAM and four times its storage.

The Xiaomi 17T (12 + 512 GB) uses 12 GB LPDDR5X with 512 GB UFS 4.1. The Vivo X300 FE (12 + 256 GB) has 12 GB LPDDR5X (5300 MHz) and 256 GB UFS 4.1. All four phones use LPDDR5X, so the differences are capacity and storage revision, not RAM generation.

The Edge 50 Ultra is the only phone on UFS 4.0, while the other three use UFS 4.1, the later revision of the standard. The Edge 50 Ultra’s 1TB of storage makes this a minor trade-off for most buyers. The X300 FE is the only listing that states its RAM speed, at 5300 MHz.

None of the four phones has a microSD slot, so the storage you buy is the storage you keep. This makes the V80’s 256 GB more of a limit than it looks on paper. A buyer who records 4K video or stores large game libraries will fill it sooner than on the Edge 50 Ultra (1TB) or Xiaomi 17T (512 GB). The V80 is also sold in 8 + 128 GB and 8 + 512 GB variants, but only 8 + 256 GB is compared here.

Prices are retailer quotes from 31 October 2026. The vivo V80 costs ~PKR 240,000 new. The Edge 50 Ultra costs PKR 185,000, which is PKR 55,000 less for double the RAM and four times the storage. The Xiaomi 17T costs PKR 218,000, which is PKR 22,000 less with 4 GB more RAM and double the storage. The X300 FE costs PKR 250,000, only about PKR 10,000 more for 4 GB more RAM at the same storage.

PhoneVariantRAMRAM TypeStorage TypemicroSDPrice (PKR, new)
vivo V808 + 256 GB8 GBLPDDR5XUFS 4.1No~240,000
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra16 + 1TB16 GBLPDDR5XUFS 4.0No185,000
Xiaomi 17T12 + 512 GB12 GBLPDDR5XUFS 4.1No218,000
Vivo X300 FE12 + 256 GB12 GBLPDDR5X (5300 MHz)UFS 4.1No250,000

Verdict: The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has the strongest memory package here, with 16 GB RAM and 1TB storage at PKR 185,000, the lowest price in the group. The Xiaomi 17T is the best balanced option at 12 GB and 512 GB for PKR 218,000. The vivo V80 is the weakest on memory, with only 8 GB RAM and 256 GB with no expansion at ~PKR 240,000.

Camera Highlights

Camera Highlights

The vivo V80 has a 50 + 50 + 8 MP rear camera and a 50 MP front camera. It is the only phone here that lists optical stabilization. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra lists stabilization as Yes without naming the type, and the Xiaomi 17T and Vivo X300 FE list none, so OIS is confirmed only on the V80. No phone lists aperture or sensor size.

Sensor transparency varies. The Edge 50 Ultra names all three rear sensors (OmniVision OV50H, Samsung ISOCELL JN1 and OmniVision OV64B periscope) and its Samsung S5KJN1 front sensor. The V80 names two 50 MP sensors, Sony LYT-700C and Sony IMX882, while its 8 MP sensor is not confirmed and no front sensor is listed.

The X300 FE names Sony IMX882 and Sony IMX921 plus a Samsung S5KJN1 front sensor, with its 8 MP sensor unknown. The Xiaomi 17T names only its OmniVision OV50 Light Fusion 800, and its other two rear sensors are not confirmed.

The Xiaomi 17T leads on zoom with 5x optical and 120x digital. The V80, Edge 50 Ultra and X300 FE are all 3x optical, and the X300 FE lists no digital zoom.

Video favors the Edge 50 Ultra, which records 4K at 60 fps on both rear and front cameras and offers 1080p at 960 fps slow motion. The X300 FE records rear 4K up to 120 fps. The V80 front camera tops out at 4K 30 fps, and the Xiaomi 17T has a 32 MP front camera against 50 MP on the other three. The X300 FE lists no rear flash, while the V80 has a ring light.

Prices are retailer quotes from 31 October 2026.

PhoneRear CameraFront CameraStabilizationOptical ZoomRear VideoFront VideoPrice (PKR, new)
vivo V8050 + 50 + 8 MP50 MPOptical3x4K 30/60 fps, 1080p 30/60 fps4K 30 fps, 1080p 30/60 fps~240,000
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra64 + 50 + 50 MP50 MPYes (type not listed)3x4K 60 fps, 1080p 960 fps4K 60 fps, 1080p 60/120 fps185,000
Xiaomi 17T50 + 50 + 12 MP32 MPNot listed5x4K 30/60 fps, 1080p 240/960 fps4K 30/60 fps, 1080p 60 fps218,000
Vivo X300 FE50 + 50 + 8 MP50 MPNot listed3x4K 30/60/120 fps, 1080p 30/60/120/240 fps4K 60 fps250,000

Verdict: The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has the best-documented camera system here, with all sensors named and 4K 60 fps on both cameras at PKR 185,000. The vivo V80 is the only phone with confirmed optical stabilization, but at ~PKR 240,000 it has an unconfirmed 8 MP sensor and the weakest front video at 4K 30 fps. Buyers who want the longest zoom should look at the Xiaomi 17T at 5x optical.

Battery & Charging Highlights

Battery & Charging Highlights

The vivo V80 has the largest battery in this group at 7200 mAh, a Silicon-Carbon cell with 90W wired charging. It lists 18h 30m in the PCMark battery test, the longest result here. The Xiaomi 17T and Vivo X300 FE both have 6500 mAh, which is 700 mAh less than the V80.

The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has only 4500 mAh, which is 2700 mAh (60%) less. In PCMark, the Xiaomi 17T lists 14h 13m and the Edge 50 Ultra lists 12h 40m, which is 4h 17m and 5h 50m below the V80. The X300 FE lists no PCMark result, so its endurance cannot be ranked against the other three.

Charging speed runs the other way. The Edge 50 Ultra leads with 125W wired charging, 35W more than the V80 and X300 FE (both 90W), and the Xiaomi 17T is slowest at 67W. The Edge 50 Ultra is also the only phone with a published charge time listed in its source, so the large wattage gap is the fairer comparison across all four.

Wireless charging is a clear differentiator. The Edge 50 Ultra supports 50W wireless charging and the X300 FE supports 40W. The Xiaomi 17T lists wireless charging as No, and the V80 lists no wireless charging at all, so it is unconfirmed for that phone. For reverse charging, the X300 FE lists both wired and wireless, the V80 lists reverse wired: Yes with reverse wireless: No, the Xiaomi 17T lists 22.5W reverse wired and no reverse wireless, and the Edge 50 Ultra lists 10W reverse wireless only.

Prices are retailer quotes from 31 October 2026. The V80 costs ~PKR 240,000 new, the Edge 50 Ultra PKR 185,000, the Xiaomi 17T PKR 218,000 and the X300 FE PKR 250,000.

PhoneCapacityBattery TypeWired ChargingWireless ChargingReverse ChargingPCMark Battery LifePrice (PKR, new)
vivo V807200 mAhSilicon-Carbon90WNot listedWired: Yes, Wireless: No18h 30m~240,000
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra4500 mAhLi-Po125W50WWireless: 10W12h 40m185,000
Xiaomi 17T6500 mAhSi/C Li-Ion67WNoWired: 22.5W, Wireless: No14h 13m218,000
Vivo X300 FE6500 mAhSilicon-Carbon90W40WWired: Yes, Wireless: YesNot listed250,000

Verdict: The vivo V80 has the best battery endurance here, with 7200 mAh and 18h 30m in PCMark, but at ~PKR 240,000 it lacks listed wireless charging. The Vivo X300 FE is the most complete package, with 40W wireless and both reverse charging modes at PKR 250,000.

The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra charges fastest at 125W wired and 50W wireless for PKR 185,000, but its 4500 mAh cell is the smallest in the group.

Final Verdict

The Xiaomi 17T is the overall winner in this comparison at PKR 218,000 new. It scores 2.4M AnTuTu (v11) on the Dimensity 8500 Ultra, pairs 12 GB LPDDR5X with 512 GB UFS 4.1, and has the longest optical zoom here at 5x. Its 6500 mAh battery lasts 14h 13m in PCMark and its display has the highest listed HBM at 2000 nits. It lacks wireless charging, lists no stabilization and runs at 120 Hz, but no rival matches its combination of performance, memory and price.

The Vivo X300 FE is a close second and the strongest phone on raw specs at PKR 250,000. It leads on processor (2.9M), display (1440 x 3168 LTPO AMOLED) and wireless charging (40W), but it costs PKR 32,000 more than the Xiaomi 17T for only 12 GB and 256 GB of memory. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra takes third place.

At PKR 185,000 it offers 16 GB RAM, 1TB storage and 125W charging, but its 1.5M score and 4500 mAh battery are weak for the group.

The vivo V80 finishes fourth. At ~PKR 240,000 new it has the best battery endurance (7200 mAh, 18h 30m), the only confirmed optical stabilization and a bright 144 Hz display. However, it has the lowest processor score at 1.4M, the least RAM at 8 GB and no microSD slot. It costs PKR 22,000 more than the Xiaomi 17T and PKR 55,000 more than the Edge 50 Ultra while trailing both on performance and memory.

In this ranking, processor, display and battery carry the most weight, followed by memory and camera. A 100K AnTuTu gap, like the one between the V80 and Edge 50 Ultra, barely changes daily use, so price decided that placement. Prices are retailer quotes from 31 October 2026.

Bottom line: The Xiaomi 17T is the best overall value at PKR 218,000, the Vivo X300 FE is the best choice for maximum performance and display quality, and the vivo V80 only makes sense for buyers who put battery life and optical stabilization first.

Ranking:

  1. Xiaomi 17T – PKR 218,000 (new)
  2. Vivo X300 FE – PKR 250,000 (new)
  3. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra – PKR 185,000 (new)
  4. vivo V80 – ~PKR 240,000 (new)

Display Highlights

Display Highlights

The vivo V80 has a 6.59-inch AMOLED panel at 1260 x 2750 pixels with a 144 Hz refresh rate, 5000 nits peak brightness and 1800 nits HBM. It is the only phone here that combines 144 Hz with 5000 nits peak brightness. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also runs at 144 Hz on a 6.7-inch P-OLED, but it reaches only 2500 nits peak and 1500 nits HBM.

The Xiaomi 17T has a 6.59-inch AMOLED at 120 Hz, with 3500 nits peak and the highest HBM in the group at 2000 nits. The Vivo X300 FE matches the V80 on peak brightness at 5000 nits and lists a similar HBM of ~1800 nits, which is approximate in its listing.

Peak and HBM are different measurements, so the two columns should be read separately. Peak brightness usually applies to small bright areas in HDR content, while HBM reflects sunlight visibility. For outdoor use, the Xiaomi 17T has the strongest listed HBM at 2000 nits, ahead of the V80 by 200 nits.

Sharpness separates the phones too. The X300 FE leads at 1440 x 3168 pixels on a smaller 6.31-inch panel, about 551 PPI, and it is the only phone here that lists LTPO. The Xiaomi 17T (~460 PPI) and V80 (~459 PPI) are effectively equal, and the Edge 50 Ultra is lowest at ~444 PPI. The X300 FE also gives up 144 Hz, topping out at 120 Hz, the same as the Xiaomi 17T.

Prices are retailer quotes from 31 October 2026. The vivo V80 costs ~PKR 240,000 new, the Edge 50 Ultra PKR 185,000, the Xiaomi 17T PKR 218,000 and the X300 FE PKR 250,000.

PhoneSizeResolutionPanelRefresh RatePeak BrightnessHBM Brightness
vivo V806.59-inch1260 x 2750AMOLED144 Hz5000 nits1800 nits
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra6.7-inch1220 x 2712P-OLED144 Hz2500 nits1500 nits
Xiaomi 17T6.59-inch1268 x 2756AMOLED120 Hz3500 nits2000 nits
Vivo X300 FE6.31-inch1440 x 3168LTPO AMOLED120 Hz5000 nits~1800 nits

Verdict: The Vivo X300 FE has the best display on paper, with 1440 x 3168 resolution, LTPO and 5000 nits peak at PKR 250,000. The vivo V80 is a close second at ~PKR 240,000, with the same 5000 nits peak and a faster 144 Hz panel. The Xiaomi 17T is the better value for outdoor visibility, with 2000 nits HBM at PKR 218,000, which is about PKR 22,000 less than the V80.

Performance Highlights

Performance Highlights

The vivo V80 scores 1.4M AnTuTu (v11) on its Snapdragon 7 Gen 4, the lowest in this group. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is only slightly ahead at 1.5M on the Snapdragon 8s Gen 3. The Xiaomi 17T reaches 2.4M on the Dimensity 8500 Ultra, and the Vivo X300 FE leads at 2.9M on the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, roughly double the V80. All four phones have a v11 result, so v11 is the fair four-way comparison. A v10 score exists only for the V80 (1.01M) and the Xiaomi 17T (1.7M), so v10 cannot rank the Edge 50 Ultra or X300 FE.

The V80’s 2.8 GHz peak clock and 4 nm process trail the Xiaomi 17T’s 3.4 GHz on 4 nm and the X300 FE’s 3.8 GHz on 3 nm. The V80 pairs one Cortex-A720 at 2.8 GHz and four at 2.4 GHz with three Cortex-A520 cores, and its GPU is an Adreno 722.

The Edge 50 Ultra pairs a 3.0 GHz prime core with an Adreno 735 GPU, one step above the V80’s Adreno 722. Its prime core type is not named in the listing. The Xiaomi 17T runs eight Cortex-A725 cores with a Mali-G720 MC8 GPU, and the X300 FE has an Adreno 829.

Boot time is listed for three phones. The Xiaomi 17T boots in 18 s, the Edge 50 Ultra in 22 s and the V80 in 27 s. The X300 FE lists no boot time.

Prices are retailer quotes from 31 October 2026. The V80 costs ~PKR 240,000 new. The Edge 50 Ultra is PKR 185,000, which is PKR 55,000 less for 100K more points. The Xiaomi 17T is PKR 218,000, which is PKR 22,000 less for 1.0M more. The X300 FE is PKR 250,000, only about PKR 10,000 more for 1.5M more.

PhoneProcessorProcessGPUMax ClockAnTuTu v11AnTuTu v10Boot TimePrice (PKR, new)
vivo V80Snapdragon 7 Gen 44 nmAdreno 7222.8 GHz1.4M1.01M27 s~240,000
Motorola Edge 50 UltraSnapdragon 8s Gen 34 nmAdreno 7353.0 GHz1.5MNot listed22 s185,000
Xiaomi 17TDimensity 8500 Ultra4 nmMali-G720 MC8 / MP83.4 GHz2.4M1.7M18 s218,000
Vivo X300 FESnapdragon 8 Elite Gen 53 nmAdreno 8293.8 GHz2.9MNot listedNot listed250,000

Verdict: The Vivo X300 FE is the fastest phone here at 2.9M AnTuTu (v11) and costs only about PKR 10,000 more than the vivo V80. The Xiaomi 17T is the best performance value at 2.4M and PKR 218,000. The vivo V80 is the weakest performer at 1.4M, so it only makes sense for buyers who prioritize its other features over raw speed.

Memory & Storage Highlights

Memory & Storage Highlights

The vivo V80 (8 + 256 GB) pairs 8 GB LPDDR5X RAM with 256 GB UFS 4.1 storage and has no microSD slot. It has the least RAM in this group. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra (16 + 1TB) has 16 GB LPDDR5X and 1TB UFS 4.0, which is twice the V80’s RAM and four times its storage.

The Xiaomi 17T (12 + 512 GB) uses 12 GB LPDDR5X with 512 GB UFS 4.1. The Vivo X300 FE (12 + 256 GB) has 12 GB LPDDR5X (5300 MHz) and 256 GB UFS 4.1. All four phones use LPDDR5X, so the differences are capacity and storage revision, not RAM generation.

The Edge 50 Ultra is the only phone on UFS 4.0, while the other three use UFS 4.1, the later revision of the standard. The Edge 50 Ultra’s 1TB of storage makes this a minor trade-off for most buyers. The X300 FE is the only listing that states its RAM speed, at 5300 MHz.

None of the four phones has a microSD slot, so the storage you buy is the storage you keep. This makes the V80’s 256 GB more of a limit than it looks on paper. A buyer who records 4K video or stores large game libraries will fill it sooner than on the Edge 50 Ultra (1TB) or Xiaomi 17T (512 GB). The V80 is also sold in 8 + 128 GB and 8 + 512 GB variants, but only 8 + 256 GB is compared here.

Prices are retailer quotes from 31 October 2026. The vivo V80 costs ~PKR 240,000 new. The Edge 50 Ultra costs PKR 185,000, which is PKR 55,000 less for double the RAM and four times the storage. The Xiaomi 17T costs PKR 218,000, which is PKR 22,000 less with 4 GB more RAM and double the storage. The X300 FE costs PKR 250,000, only about PKR 10,000 more for 4 GB more RAM at the same storage.

PhoneVariantRAMRAM TypeStorage TypemicroSDPrice (PKR, new)
vivo V808 + 256 GB8 GBLPDDR5XUFS 4.1No~240,000
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra16 + 1TB16 GBLPDDR5XUFS 4.0No185,000
Xiaomi 17T12 + 512 GB12 GBLPDDR5XUFS 4.1No218,000
Vivo X300 FE12 + 256 GB12 GBLPDDR5X (5300 MHz)UFS 4.1No250,000

Verdict: The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has the strongest memory package here, with 16 GB RAM and 1TB storage at PKR 185,000, the lowest price in the group. The Xiaomi 17T is the best balanced option at 12 GB and 512 GB for PKR 218,000. The vivo V80 is the weakest on memory, with only 8 GB RAM and 256 GB with no expansion at ~PKR 240,000.

Camera Highlights

Camera Highlights

The vivo V80 has a 50 + 50 + 8 MP rear camera and a 50 MP front camera. It is the only phone here that lists optical stabilization. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra lists stabilization as Yes without naming the type, and the Xiaomi 17T and Vivo X300 FE list none, so OIS is confirmed only on the V80. No phone lists aperture or sensor size.

Sensor transparency varies. The Edge 50 Ultra names all three rear sensors (OmniVision OV50H, Samsung ISOCELL JN1 and OmniVision OV64B periscope) and its Samsung S5KJN1 front sensor. The V80 names two 50 MP sensors, Sony LYT-700C and Sony IMX882, while its 8 MP sensor is not confirmed and no front sensor is listed.

The X300 FE names Sony IMX882 and Sony IMX921 plus a Samsung S5KJN1 front sensor, with its 8 MP sensor unknown. The Xiaomi 17T names only its OmniVision OV50 Light Fusion 800, and its other two rear sensors are not confirmed.

The Xiaomi 17T leads on zoom with 5x optical and 120x digital. The V80, Edge 50 Ultra and X300 FE are all 3x optical, and the X300 FE lists no digital zoom.

Video favors the Edge 50 Ultra, which records 4K at 60 fps on both rear and front cameras and offers 1080p at 960 fps slow motion. The X300 FE records rear 4K up to 120 fps. The V80 front camera tops out at 4K 30 fps, and the Xiaomi 17T has a 32 MP front camera against 50 MP on the other three. The X300 FE lists no rear flash, while the V80 has a ring light.

Prices are retailer quotes from 31 October 2026.

PhoneRear CameraFront CameraStabilizationOptical ZoomRear VideoFront VideoPrice (PKR, new)
vivo V8050 + 50 + 8 MP50 MPOptical3x4K 30/60 fps, 1080p 30/60 fps4K 30 fps, 1080p 30/60 fps~240,000
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra64 + 50 + 50 MP50 MPYes (type not listed)3x4K 60 fps, 1080p 960 fps4K 60 fps, 1080p 60/120 fps185,000
Xiaomi 17T50 + 50 + 12 MP32 MPNot listed5x4K 30/60 fps, 1080p 240/960 fps4K 30/60 fps, 1080p 60 fps218,000
Vivo X300 FE50 + 50 + 8 MP50 MPNot listed3x4K 30/60/120 fps, 1080p 30/60/120/240 fps4K 60 fps250,000

Verdict: The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has the best-documented camera system here, with all sensors named and 4K 60 fps on both cameras at PKR 185,000. The vivo V80 is the only phone with confirmed optical stabilization, but at ~PKR 240,000 it has an unconfirmed 8 MP sensor and the weakest front video at 4K 30 fps. Buyers who want the longest zoom should look at the Xiaomi 17T at 5x optical.

Battery & Charging Highlights

Battery & Charging Highlights

The vivo V80 has the largest battery in this group at 7200 mAh, a Silicon-Carbon cell with 90W wired charging. It lists 18h 30m in the PCMark battery test, the longest result here. The Xiaomi 17T and Vivo X300 FE both have 6500 mAh, which is 700 mAh less than the V80.

The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has only 4500 mAh, which is 2700 mAh (60%) less. In PCMark, the Xiaomi 17T lists 14h 13m and the Edge 50 Ultra lists 12h 40m, which is 4h 17m and 5h 50m below the V80. The X300 FE lists no PCMark result, so its endurance cannot be ranked against the other three.

Charging speed runs the other way. The Edge 50 Ultra leads with 125W wired charging, 35W more than the V80 and X300 FE (both 90W), and the Xiaomi 17T is slowest at 67W. The Edge 50 Ultra is also the only phone with a published charge time listed in its source, so the large wattage gap is the fairer comparison across all four.

Wireless charging is a clear differentiator. The Edge 50 Ultra supports 50W wireless charging and the X300 FE supports 40W. The Xiaomi 17T lists wireless charging as No, and the V80 lists no wireless charging at all, so it is unconfirmed for that phone. For reverse charging, the X300 FE lists both wired and wireless, the V80 lists reverse wired: Yes with reverse wireless: No, the Xiaomi 17T lists 22.5W reverse wired and no reverse wireless, and the Edge 50 Ultra lists 10W reverse wireless only.

Prices are retailer quotes from 31 October 2026. The V80 costs ~PKR 240,000 new, the Edge 50 Ultra PKR 185,000, the Xiaomi 17T PKR 218,000 and the X300 FE PKR 250,000.

PhoneCapacityBattery TypeWired ChargingWireless ChargingReverse ChargingPCMark Battery LifePrice (PKR, new)
vivo V807200 mAhSilicon-Carbon90WNot listedWired: Yes, Wireless: No18h 30m~240,000
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra4500 mAhLi-Po125W50WWireless: 10W12h 40m185,000
Xiaomi 17T6500 mAhSi/C Li-Ion67WNoWired: 22.5W, Wireless: No14h 13m218,000
Vivo X300 FE6500 mAhSilicon-Carbon90W40WWired: Yes, Wireless: YesNot listed250,000

Verdict: The vivo V80 has the best battery endurance here, with 7200 mAh and 18h 30m in PCMark, but at ~PKR 240,000 it lacks listed wireless charging. The Vivo X300 FE is the most complete package, with 40W wireless and both reverse charging modes at PKR 250,000.

The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra charges fastest at 125W wired and 50W wireless for PKR 185,000, but its 4500 mAh cell is the smallest in the group.

Final Verdict

The Xiaomi 17T is the overall winner in this comparison at PKR 218,000 new. It scores 2.4M AnTuTu (v11) on the Dimensity 8500 Ultra, pairs 12 GB LPDDR5X with 512 GB UFS 4.1, and has the longest optical zoom here at 5x. Its 6500 mAh battery lasts 14h 13m in PCMark and its display has the highest listed HBM at 2000 nits. It lacks wireless charging, lists no stabilization and runs at 120 Hz, but no rival matches its combination of performance, memory and price.

The Vivo X300 FE is a close second and the strongest phone on raw specs at PKR 250,000. It leads on processor (2.9M), display (1440 x 3168 LTPO AMOLED) and wireless charging (40W), but it costs PKR 32,000 more than the Xiaomi 17T for only 12 GB and 256 GB of memory. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra takes third place.

At PKR 185,000 it offers 16 GB RAM, 1TB storage and 125W charging, but its 1.5M score and 4500 mAh battery are weak for the group.

The vivo V80 finishes fourth. At ~PKR 240,000 new it has the best battery endurance (7200 mAh, 18h 30m), the only confirmed optical stabilization and a bright 144 Hz display. However, it has the lowest processor score at 1.4M, the least RAM at 8 GB and no microSD slot. It costs PKR 22,000 more than the Xiaomi 17T and PKR 55,000 more than the Edge 50 Ultra while trailing both on performance and memory.

In this ranking, processor, display and battery carry the most weight, followed by memory and camera. A 100K AnTuTu gap, like the one between the V80 and Edge 50 Ultra, barely changes daily use, so price decided that placement. Prices are retailer quotes from 31 October 2026.

Bottom line: The Xiaomi 17T is the best overall value at PKR 218,000, the Vivo X300 FE is the best choice for maximum performance and display quality, and the vivo V80 only makes sense for buyers who put battery life and optical stabilization first.

Ranking:

  1. Xiaomi 17T – PKR 218,000 (new)
  2. Vivo X300 FE – PKR 250,000 (new)
  3. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra – PKR 185,000 (new)
  4. vivo V80 – ~PKR 240,000 (new)

Pros and Cons

Pros

  • Bright 144Hz 1.5K AMOLED
  • Excellent 50MP OIS main camera
  • 50MP 3x OIS telephoto zoom
  • Huge 7,200mAh battery
  • Very fast 90W wired charging
  • IP68/IP69 durable premium build

Cons

  • Same Snapdragon 7 Gen 4
  • Weak 8MP ultrawide camera
  • No wireless charging
  • Premium price for midrange chip
  • Oversaturated camera colors
  • Limited heavy gaming power

Who Is It Best For?

Best For

  • Portrait photography fans
  • Zoom photography users
  • Battery-focused users
  • Outdoor display visibility
  • Video streaming enthusiasts
  • Premium design seekers

Not Best For

  • Hardcore mobile gamers
  • Wide-angle photography fans
  • Wireless-charging seekers
  • Flagship performance seekers
  • Budget-conscious buyers
  • Natural-color photography fans
Video Reviews & Tests
// hands-on videos for this phone

Official Trailer

Launch Teaser
Official Trailer

Unboxing

What's In The Box
Unboxing

PUBG Gaming Test

FPS & Heat Test
PUBG Gaming Test

Camera Test

Photo & Video Samples
Camera Test

Related Comparisions

VIVO Series Row
Picture of Faisal Ur Rehman

Faisal Ur Rehman

Faisal Rehman is the founder and editor of FSL Specs, where he publishes in-depth smartphone specifications, comparisons, buying guides, and technology insights. With extensive experience in mobile hardware research and technical analysis, he provides accurate and up-to-date information on Android smartphones, processors, displays, cameras, batteries, performance benchmarks, and software features. His goal is to simplify complex specifications and help readers choose the right device with confidence.

FAQs Questions

It has a 6.59-inch AMOLED display at 1260 × 2750 resolution with a 144Hz refresh rate. Brightness peaks at 5,000 nits, with 1,800 nits in high brightness mode, so it stays vivid and readable even in strong sunlight.

It runs on the Snapdragon 7 Gen 4, a 4nm octa-core chip with a top clock of 2.8GHz and an Adreno 722 GPU. It scores about 1.4 million on AnTuTu v11, so it handles popular games and multitasking smoothly.

It comes with 8GB of LPDDR5X RAM and UFS 4.1 storage in 128GB, 256GB or 512GB options. There’s no microSD slot, so choose your storage size carefully.

The back has a 50MP Sony LYT-700C main sensor, a 50MP Sony IMX882 sensor with 3x optical zoom, and an 8MP third camera, with optical image stabilization. The front camera is 50MP and records 4K video, so it’s a strong pick for selfies and vlogs.

It has a 7,200mAh silicon-carbon battery with 90W wired charging and reverse wired charging. It lasted 18 hours 30 minutes in the PCMark battery test, so a full day of heavy use is easy.

Yes. It supports 5G, Wi-Fi 6, Bluetooth 5.4 and NFC, and it takes a nano SIM or an eSIM. It also runs Android 17, so it’s ready for fast networks and modern software.

It has an aluminum frame and a glass back, weighs 203g and measures just 7.7mm thick. It feels slim and premium despite the large battery, and it has stereo speakers and a front fingerprint sensor.

Scroll to Top