• Mobiles
  • Processors

FSL Specs

  • Mobiles
  • Processors
Flyout Menu
Menu
Flyout Menu

FSL Specs

  • Mobiles
  • Processors

✪ vivo x300 ✪

Vivo x300 Specs, Price, Camera, Battery & Best Review (2026)
United States flag United States
$800 USD
…
Pakistan flag Pakistan (PKR)
300,000 PKR
India flag India (INR)
₹80,000 INR
Compare Mobiles
Add us as a preferred source on Google Search

✪ vivo x300 ✪

Vivo x300 Specs, Price, Camera, Battery & Best Review (2026)
Last Time Update : 8 October, 2026
0
Vivo X300 (3)
Vivo X300 (1)
Vivo X300 (4)
Vivo X300 (5)

Quick Specifications

LTPO Amoled

Display Type

Dimensity 9500

Processor

12 + 512 GB

Ram And Memory

200 + 50 + 50 MP

Camera

6040 mAh

Battery

90 W

Fast Charging

Full Specification

BASIC INFO
Mobile
vivo x300
Model
V2509A
Series
Vivo X Series
Category
Flagship
Release Date
13 October,2025
Year
2025
CONNECTIVITY
Sim
Nano-SIM / E-Sim
Network
4G / 4G+ / 5G/ 5G+
WiFi
Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth
5.4
NFC
Yes
OS
Android 17, OriginOS 7
BODY
Dimensions
150.6 x 71.9 x 8 mm
Build
Aluminum Frame And Glass Back
KG Weight
226g
Screen Size
6.31 inch
Resolution
1216 x 2640 Pixels
Type
LTPO Amoled
Refresh Rate
120 Hz
Peak Brightness
4500 nits
HBM Brightness
1600 nits
Processor
Dimensity 9500
Processor Link
Dimensity 9500
Max Clock
4.21 GHz
Lithography
3 nm
GPU
Arm/Mali G1-Ultra
CPU Cores
8 Cores
Antutu v11
3.4 M
Bootup Time
21s
Architecture
1 x 4.21 GHz (C1-Ultra)
3 x 3.5 GHz (C1-Premium)
4 x 2.7 GHz (C1-Pro)
Ram Memory
12 + 512 GB
Ram Type
LPDDR5X
Storage Type
UFS 4.1
SD Card
No
Variants
12 + 256 GB
16 + 256 GB
12 + 512 GB
16 + 512 GB
16 + 1 TB
MP
Rear Camera
200 + 50 + 50 MP
Front Camera
50 MP
SENSORS
Camera Sensors
200 MP= Samsung ISOCELL HPB
50 MP= Samsung S5KJN1
50 MP =Sony LYT-602
Front Sensors
50 MP = Samsung S5KJN1
RECORDING FPS
Main Recording
4K @30/60/120fps
1080p @30/60/120/240fps
Front Recording
4K@ 30/60fps
1080p @30/60fps
RESOLUTION
Main Resolution
16,320 × 12,240 Pixels
Front Resolution
8192 x 6144 Pixels
ZOOM
Optical Zoom
3 x
D Digital Zoom
100 X
FLASH
Flash
Dual-LED Flash
Front Flash
No
Capacity
6040 mAh
Fast Charging
90 W
Wireless Charging
40 W
Li Battery Type
Silicon-Carbon
REVERSE
Reverse Wired
Yes
Reverse Wireless
Yes
OTHER
Battery PC Marks
15 hours
Charging Time
50m-60m (0% To 100%)
AUDIO & SENSORS
Speaker
Dual Stereo Speaker
Fingerprint Sensor
Hyper Sonic Front Finger
Other Sensors
Accelerometer
Gyroscope
Proximity
Compass
Hall sensor
Special Features

–

BASIC INFO
Mobile
vivo x300
Model
V2509A
Series
Vivo X Series
Category
Flagship
Release Date
13 October,2025
Year
2025
CONNECTIVITY
Sim
Nano-SIM / E-Sim
Network
4G / 4G+ / 5G/ 5G+
WiFi
Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth
5.4
NFC
Yes
OS
Android 17, OriginOS 7
BODY
Dimensions
150.6 x 71.9 x 8 mm
Build
Aluminum Frame And Glass Back
KG Weight
226g
Screen Size
6.31 inch
Resolution
1216 x 2640 Pixels
Type
LTPO Amoled
Refresh Rate
120 Hz
Peak Brightness
4500 nits
HBM Brightness
1600 nits
Processor
Dimensity 9500
Processor Link
Dimensity 9500
Max Clock
4.21 GHz
Lithography
3 nm
GPU
Arm/Mali G1-Ultra
CPU Cores
8 Cores
Antutu v11
3.4 M
Bootup Time
21s
Architecture
1 x 4.21 GHz (C1-Ultra)
3 x 3.5 GHz (C1-Premium)
4 x 2.7 GHz (C1-Pro)
Ram Memory
12 + 512 GB
SD Card
No
Ram Type
LPDDR5X
Storage Type
UFS 4.1
Variants
12 + 256 GB
16 + 256 GB
12 + 512 GB
16 + 512 GB
16 + 1 TB
MP
Rear Camera
200 + 50 + 50 MP
Front Camera
50 MP
SENSORS
Main Camera Sensors
200 MP= Samsung ISOCELL HPB
50 MP= Samsung S5KJN1
50 MP =Sony LYT-602
Front Camera Sensors
50 MP = Samsung S5KJN1
RECORDING FPS
Main Recording
4K @30/60/120fps
1080p @30/60/120/240fps
Front Recording
4K@ 30/60fps
1080p @30/60fps
RESOLUTION
Main Resolution
16,320 × 12,240 Pixels
Front Resolution
8192 x 6144 Pixels
ZOOM
Optical Zoom
3 x
D Digital Zoom
100 X
FLASH
Flash
Dual-LED Flash
Front Flash
No
Capacity
6040 mAh
Fast Charging
90 W
Wireless Charging
40 W
Li Battery Type
Silicon-Carbon
REVERSE
Reverse Wired
Yes
Reverse Wireless
Yes
OTHER
Battery Life PCMark
15 hours
Charging Time
50m-60m (0% To 100%)
AUDIO & SENSORS
Speaker
Dual Stereo Speaker
Fingerprint Sensor
Hyper Sonic Front Finger
Other Sensors
Accelerometer
Gyroscope
Proximity
Compass
Hall sensor
Special Features

–

Highlights & Review Of vivo x300

Display Review:

The vivo X300 has the most balanced premium display specification in this comparison, with a 6.31-inch AMOLED panel, 2640 × 1216 resolution, 1–120Hz LTPO adaptive refresh rate and 4500-nit local peak brightness. The vivo X300 FE is extremely close, using a 6.31-inch AMOLED panel with the same 2640 × 1216 resolution and 1–120Hz adaptive refresh rate.

The RedMagic 11 Pro goes larger with a 6.85-inch AMOLED display, 2688 × 1216 resolution and 144Hz refresh rate, while the Samsung Galaxy S26 uses a more compact 6.3-inch Dynamic AMOLED 2X 120Hz panel.

For gaming, the RedMagic has the clear refresh-rate advantage. Its 144Hz panel, 3000Hz instantaneous touch sampling and 360Hz multi-finger touch sampling are specifically designed around competitive gaming. Its large 6.85-inch screen is also useful for immersive gameplay.

The vivo X300 and X300 FE take a different approach. Their LTPO panels can dynamically operate from 1Hz to 120Hz, which is more efficient for static content while still providing smooth scrolling and animation. The X300 also has 460 PPI and a 4500-nit local peak brightness specification.

Samsung’s Galaxy S26 is the smallest display here and is therefore easier to handle, while Samsung specifies 2600 nits peak brightness and a 120Hz Dynamic AMOLED 2X panel.

For gaming, the RedMagic 11 Pro wins. For a combination of resolution, LTPO efficiency, brightness and compact flagship usability, the vivo X300 is stronger.

Display winner: vivo X300

Processor Review:

The vivo X300 is powered by MediaTek’s Dimensity 9500 (3nm) chipset with an octa-core CPU (1x 4.21GHz C1-Ultra + 3x 3.5GHz C1-Premium + 4x 2.7GHz C1-Pro) and Mali-G1 Ultra MC12 GPU, scoring ~3,105,943 to 3,416,530 points on AnTuTu v11, with Geekbench 6 single-core at ~3,075 and multi-core at ~9,843, making it the second-fastest in this group for raw AnTuTu scores, with strong sustained performance and 12GB LPDDR5X RAM for multitasking.

The ZTE Nubia RedMagic 11 Pro uses Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3nm) chipset with an octa-core CPU (1x 4.61GHz + 3x 3.8GHz + 4x 3.0GHz) and Adreno 840 GPU, scoring ~4,113,275 to 4,208,874 points on AnTuTu v11, the highest in this group, with Geekbench 6 single-core at ~3,793 and multi-core at ~10,000+, making it the fastest for raw AnTuTu scores, gaming, and sustained performance, thanks to its liquid cooling system and REDMAGIC RedCore R4 optimization.

The Samsung Galaxy S26 comes in two variants: the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy (3nm) model scores ~3,400,000 points on AnTuTu v11, while the Exynos 2600 (2nm) variant scores ~2,663,898 points, with Geekbench 6 single-core at ~3,648 and multi-core at ~10,989 (Snapdragon), making the Snapdragon variant competitive with the RedMagic 11 Pro but the Exynos variant slower in raw scores, though both offer strong sustained performance with One UI 8.5 optimization.

The vivo X300 FE is powered by Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 (3nm) chipset with an octa-core CPU (1x 3.0GHz + 6x 2.8GHz) and Adreno 829 GPU, scoring ~2,857,236 to 3,161,598 points on AnTuTu v11, with Geekbench 6 single-core at ~2,692–2,767 and multi-core at ~8,425–8,750, making it the third-fastest in this group for raw AnTuTu scores, with strong sustained performance and 12GB LPDDR5X RAM for multitasking.

Processor & AnTuTu v11 Comparison Table

Featurevivo X300ZTE Nubia RedMagic 11 ProSamsung Galaxy S26 (Snapdragon)Samsung Galaxy S26 (Exynos)vivo X300 FE
ChipsetDimensity 9500 (3nm)Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3nm)Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy (3nm)Exynos 2600 (2nm)Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 (3nm)
CPU1x 4.21GHz + 3x 3.5GHz + 4x 2.7GHz1x 4.61GHz + 3x 3.8GHz + 4x 3.0GHz1x 4.74GHz + 3x 3.8GHz + 4x 3.0GHz1x 4.5GHz + 3x 3.7GHz + 4x 2.8GHz1x 3.0GHz + 6x 2.8GHz
GPUMali-G1 Ultra MC12Adreno 840Adreno 840Xclipse 960Adreno 829
AnTuTu v11 Score~3,105,943 – 3,416,530~4,113,275 – 4,208,874~3,400,000~2,663,898~2,857,236 – 3,161,598
Geekbench 6 Single~3,075~3,793~3,648~2,777~2,692–2,767
Geekbench 6 Multi~9,843~10,000+~10,989~9,718~8,425–8,637
RAM + Storage12GB + 512GB (LPDDR5X + UFS 4.1)16GB + 512GB (LPDDR5T + UFS 4.1 Pro)12GB + 512GB (LPDDR5X + UFS 4.0)12GB + 512GB (LPDDR5X + UFS 4.0)12GB + 256GB (LPDDR5X + UFS 4.1)
Best ForGaming, multitasking, & balanced performanceGaming & peak performanceGaming, multitasking, & single-core CPUBudget flagship performanceGaming & battery conservation

AnTuTu v11 Percentage Difference

  • ZTE Nubia RedMagic 11 Pro vs vivo X300: +20–35% faster (4.11–4.21M vs 3.11–3.42M average)

  • ZTE Nubia RedMagic 11 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy S26 (Snapdragon): +18–24% faster (4.11–4.21M vs 3.4M average)

  • ZTE Nubia RedMagic 11 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy S26 (Exynos): +55–58% faster (4.11–4.21M vs 2.66M average)

  • ZTE Nubia RedMagic 11 Pro vs vivo X300 FE: +30–47% faster (4.11–4.21M vs 2.86–3.16M average)

  • vivo X300 vs Samsung Galaxy S26 (Snapdragon): -9–1% slower (3.11–3.42M vs 3.4M average)

  • vivo X300 vs Samsung Galaxy S26 (Exynos): +17–28% faster (3.11–3.42M vs 2.66M average)

  • vivo X300 vs vivo X300 FE: +8–20% faster (3.11–3.42M vs 2.86–3.16M average)

  • Samsung Galaxy S26 (Snapdragon) vs vivo X300 FE: +8–19% faster (3.4M vs 2.86–3.16M average)

  • vivo X300 FE vs Samsung Galaxy S26 (Exynos): +7–19% faster (2.86–3.16M vs 2.66M average)

Verdict

The ZTE Nubia RedMagic 11 Pro leads in raw AnTuTu v11 scores (~4.11–4.21M points) and gaming performance, making it the best choice for users who prioritize peak performance, graphics-intensive tasks, and sustained gaming sessions. The vivo X300 offers competitive performance (~3.11–3.42M points) with strong multitasking and battery conservation, while the Samsung Galaxy S26 (Snapdragon) provides balanced performance (~3.4M points) with strong single-core Geekbench and One UI optimization. The vivo X300 FE trails with ~2.86–3.16M points but remains competitive for everyday use and media consumption.

Ram & Memory Review:

The supplied variants are vivo X300 12GB+512GB, RedMagic 11 Pro 16GB+512GB, Samsung Galaxy S26 12GB+512GB, and vivo X300 FE 12GB+256GB.

The RedMagic 11 Pro has the strongest confirmed memory configuration in this comparison: 16GB LPDDR5T RAM and 512GB UFS 4.1 Pro storage. Its gaming-oriented software and hardware also benefit from the high-capacity memory configuration.

The Samsung Galaxy S26 has 12GB RAM with 512GB storage, and Samsung officially confirms that the 512GB model comes with 12GB of memory. It is therefore a clean exact-variant match for the supplied configuration.

The vivo X300 requires an important qualification. Vivo’s official global specification currently lists 12GB+256GB and 16GB+512GB, while the supplied comparison variant is 12GB+512GB. The exact 12GB+512GB configuration has not been independently confirmed by vivo’s official specification, so it should not be treated as equivalent to the confirmed 16GB+512GB model.

The vivo X300 FE is confirmed in Pakistan as 12GB+256GB, with LPDDR5X Ultra RAM and UFS 4.1 storage. Its storage capacity is therefore half that of the supplied 512GB configurations, but its storage technology is newer than the Samsung configuration where the exact interface is not the principal differentiator.

For pure memory capacity, RedMagic 11 Pro wins with 16GB+512GB. For confirmed 512GB storage at a compact flagship size, Samsung provides a straightforward configuration.

RAM/Storage winner: RedMagic 11 Pro

Cameras Review:

The vivo X300 features a triple rear camera system with a 200MP Samsung ISOCELL HPB main sensor (1/1.4″, f/1.68, OIS, Zeiss T*), a 50MP Sony IMX885 periscope telephoto (1/1.95″, 3x optical zoom, f/2.57, OIS, Zeiss), and a 50MP Samsung JN1 ultrawide (1/2.76″, f/2.0, 119° FOV, AF), plus a 50MP front camera (f/2.0, AF). It records rear video up to 8K@30fps (main), 4K@60fps (main + telephoto), 4K@30fps (ultrawide), and 10-bit HDR, with front video at 4K@60fps and 1080p@60fps, making it the most versatile for photography and video in this group.

The ZTE Nubia RedMagic 11 Pro is equipped with a dual rear camera system with a 50MP OmniVision OV50E40 main sensor (1/1.55″, f/1.9, OIS) and a 50MP OmniVision OV50D40 ultrawide (1/2.88″, f/2.2, 14mm), but lacks a dedicated telephoto lens, plus a 16MP front camera (f/2.0). It records rear video up to 8K@30fps (main + ultrawide), 4K@60fps (all rear cameras), 1080p@240fps, with front video capped at 1080p@30fps, making it the least versatile for photography and video in this group.

The Samsung Galaxy S26 offers a triple rear camera system with a 50MP main sensor (1/1.56″, f/1.8, OIS, PDAF), a 12MP ultrawide (f/2.2, 120° FOV), and a 10MP telephoto (3x optical zoom, f/2.4, OIS, PDAF), plus a 12MP front camera (f/2.2). It records rear video up to 8K@24/30fps (main), 4K@30/60fps (all rear cameras), 1080p@240fps, and 10-bit HDR10+, with front video at 4K@30/60fps, making it the most versatile for video recording in this group.

The vivo X300 FE is equipped with a triple rear camera system with a 50MP Sony IMX921 main sensor (1/1.56″, f/1.57, OIS, Zeiss T*), a 50MP Sony IMX882 periscope telephoto (1/1.95″, 3x optical zoom, f/2.65, OIS, Zeiss), and an 8MP ultrawide (f/2.2, 115° FOV), plus a 50MP front camera (f/2.0, AF). It records rear video up to 8K@30fps (main), 4K@120fps (main), 4K@60fps (main + telephoto), and 4K HDR, with front video at 4K@60fps, making it the most versatile for photography and video in this group.

Camera Sensors & Video Recording Comparison Table

Featurevivo X300ZTE Nubia RedMagic 11 ProSamsung Galaxy S26vivo X300 FE
Main Camera200MP Samsung HPB (1/1.4″, f/1.68, OIS, Zeiss)50MP OmniVision OV50E40 (1/1.55″, f/1.9, OIS)50MP (1/1.56″, f/1.8, OIS)50MP Sony IMX921 (1/1.56″, f/1.57, OIS, Zeiss)
Telephoto50MP Sony IMX885 (3x, f/2.57, OIS, Zeiss)None10MP (3x, f/2.4, OIS)50MP Sony IMX882 (3x, f/2.65, OIS, Zeiss)
Ultrawide50MP Samsung JN1 (1/2.76″, f/2.0, 119°, AF)50MP OmniVision OV50D40 (1/2.88″, f/2.2, 14mm)12MP (f/2.2, 120°)8MP (f/2.2, 115°)
Front Camera50MP (f/2.0, AF)16MP (f/2.0)12MP (f/2.2)50MP (f/2.0, AF)
Rear Video Max8K@30fps (main), 4K@60fps (main + telephoto)8K@30fps (main + ultrawide), 4K@60fps (all)8K@24/30fps (main), 4K@30/60fps (all)8K@30fps (main), 4K@120fps (main), 4K@60fps (main + telephoto)
Front Video Max4K@60fps, 1080p@60fps1080p@30fps4K@30/60fps4K@60fps
Special FeaturesZeiss T*, 4x lossless zoomNoneSuper Steady video, 3x optical zoomZeiss T*, 4K HDR

Verdict

The vivo X300 dominates with its 200MP Zeiss main + 50MP Zeiss 3x periscope telephoto + 50MP ultrawide system, 8K@30fps video, and 50MP front camera, making it the best choice for photography enthusiasts and content creators who need maximum versatility. The vivo X300 FE offers a strong 50MP Zeiss main + 50MP Zeiss 3x periscope telephoto + 8MP ultrawide system with 8K@30fps video and 4K@120fps, making it ideal for Leica-tuned photography and video.

The Samsung Galaxy S26 provides a reliable 50MP main + 10MP 3x telephoto + 12MP ultrawide setup with 8K@24/30fps video, though it trails in telephoto resolution and sensor quality. The ZTE Nubia RedMagic 11 Pro is the weakest, with no telephoto lens, 50MP main + 50MP ultrawide only, and 1080p@30fps front video, making it unsuitable for serious photography or video work despite its gaming focus.

Battery Review:

The vivo X300 FE has the largest battery at 6500mAh, followed by the RedMagic 11 Pro at 7500mAh, wait—because the RedMagic’s 7500mAh battery is actually larger, it is the true capacity leader. The X300 uses 6040mAh, while the Galaxy S26 has 4300mAh.

The RedMagic 11 Pro’s 7500mAh battery is the biggest advantage in this category. It is paired with 80W wired and 80W wireless charging, plus charge-separation technology designed for gaming while connected to power. RedMagic also claims up to 34.1 hours of daily use under its own testing conditions.

The vivo X300 has a 6040mAh battery with 90W FlashCharge and 40W wireless charging. This gives it faster wired charging than the RedMagic, while retaining a substantially larger battery than the Galaxy S26.

The X300 FE combines a 6500mAh battery with 90W wired and 40W wireless charging, giving it a particularly strong capacity-to-charging combination.

Samsung’s Galaxy S26 is the clear capacity outlier with a 4300mAh battery, although Samsung claims up to 30 hours of video playback. Its smaller battery is partly associated with its compact 6.3-inch form factor and efficiency-focused Exynos platform.

For maximum battery capacity and sustained gaming, the RedMagic 11 Pro wins. For fast charging plus wireless charging in a compact flagship, the X300 and X300 FE are excellent alternatives.

Battery winner: RedMagic 11 Pro

Final Verdict :

Best For / Not Best For

vivo X300

Best for: Photography, compact flagship users, premium performance and users who want a high-end camera system without moving to a large phone.

Its 200MP ZEISS main camera, 50MP telephoto, 50MP ultrawide, Dimensity 9500 and 1–120Hz LTPO AMOLED make it the most balanced premium camera flagship here.

Not best for: Buyers whose priority is maximum gaming performance or the largest battery.

RedMagic 11 Pro

Best for: Gaming, sustained performance, competitive gaming and battery-heavy workloads.

Its Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, 7500mAh battery, active fan cooling, 144Hz display, 520Hz shoulder triggers and gaming chip make it the most specialized performance phone.

Not best for: Photography-focused users who want the most advanced camera hardware.

Samsung Galaxy S26

Best for: Compact flagship users, Samsung ecosystem buyers, AI features, software support and computational photography.

Its 6.3-inch size, 167g weight, IP68 rating and Galaxy AI ecosystem make it substantially more pocket-friendly than the RedMagic.

Not best for: Buyers prioritizing battery capacity, charging speed or benchmark performance per rupee.

vivo X300 FE

Best for: Buyers wanting flagship performance and camera features at a substantially lower price.

Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, 6500mAh battery, 90W charging, 40W wireless charging and ZEISS 3x telephoto system make it a strong value proposition.

Not best for: Buyers who require 512GB storage in the supplied configuration.

Final Verdict

The vivo X300 FE is the overall winner for value-adjusted scoring, because its supplied PKR 252,000 price is substantially lower than the X300, RedMagic 11 Pro and Galaxy S26 while still delivering Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 performance, 12GB RAM, UFS 4.1 storage, a 6500mAh battery, 90W wired charging, 40W wireless charging and a ZEISS telephoto camera.

The vivo X300 is the strongest all-round premium phone. Its 200MP ZEISS main camera, 50MP telephoto, 50MP ultrawide, Dimensity 9500 and LTPO AMOLED display make it the best choice for users who prioritize photography and compact flagship hardware.

The RedMagic 11 Pro is the performance specialist and has the strongest gaming hardware by a considerable margin. Its 7500mAh battery, active cooling, Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 and 144Hz display make it the obvious choice for serious gamers.

The Galaxy S26 is the most compact mainstream flagship and brings Samsung’s software, AI, IP68 durability and strong camera processing, but its supplied PKR 330,000 price makes it harder to recommend purely on hardware value.

Overall winner: vivo X300 FE

Best premium camera phone: vivo X300

Best gaming phone: RedMagic 11 Pro

Best compact mainstream flagship: Samsung Galaxy S26

Best value: vivo X300 FE

Ranking

RankPhonePricePerformanceCameraDisplayBatteryRAM/StorageOverall
1vivo X300 FE 12+256GBPKR 252,0009.09.29.49.89.59.3
2vivo X300 12+512GB*PKR 320,0009.710.09.79.29.2*9.5*
3RedMagic 11 Pro 16+512GBPKR 315,00010.07.09.310.010.09.1
4Samsung Galaxy S26 12+512GBPKR 330,0008.78.89.37.29.38.5

* Important variant caveat: the supplied vivo X300 12GB+512GB configuration is not listed on vivo’s current official global specification page; vivo lists 12GB+256GB and 16GB+512GB. Therefore, the 12GB+512GB memory score should be treated as unconfirmed, and the ranking should not use that unconfirmed configuration to give the X300 an advantage.

Because the X300’s exact supplied RAM/storage configuration is not independently confirmed, its final score is best treated as provisional. On strictly confirmed variants, the vivo X300 FE remains the safest value recommendation, while the RedMagic 11 Pro is the clear performance/gaming winner.

Pros And Cons of vivo x300

Pros of Mobile

✅ Zeiss Cameras
✅ 120Hz AMOLED
✅ Flagship Chipset
✅ Fast Charging
✅ IP69 Rating
✅ Premium Build

Cons of Mobile

❌ No Telephoto (if standard X300 lacks periscope lens)
❌ No Wireless
❌ No eSIM
❌ No Charger (market dependent)
❌ No SD Slot
❌ Premium Price

Best For - Not Best For

Best For

✅ Mobile Photography
✅ Gaming Performance
✅ Daily Multitasking
✅ Content Streaming
✅ Outdoor Usage
✅ Long-Term Use

Not Best For

❌ Budget Buyers
❌ Expandable Storage
❌ Audiophiles
❌ Stylus Users
❌ Compact Budget
❌ Charging Enthusiasts

Trailer And Unboxing of vivo x300

Disassembly Or Teardown And Gaming Test of vivo x300

Camera Test vivo x300

Rival Mobiles

Related Comparisions

Related Comparisons

  1. Vivo x300 FE vs vivo x300
  2. vivo x300 vs Xiaomi 17T Pro
VIVO Series Row

VIVO Series

VIVO X Series
X Series
VIVO V Series
V Series
VIVO Y Series
Y Series
VIVO T Series
T Series
VIVO S Series
S Series
Picture of Faisal Ur Rehman

Faisal Ur Rehman

Faisal Rehman is the founder and editor of FSL Specs, where he publishes in-depth smartphone specifications, comparisons, buying guides, and technology insights. With extensive experience in mobile hardware research and technical analysis, he provides accurate and up-to-date information on Android smartphones, processors, displays, cameras, batteries, performance benchmarks, and software features. His goal is to simplify complex specifications and help readers choose the right device with confidence.

Picture of Faisal Ur Rehman

Faisal Ur Rehman

FAQs Questions

vivo X300 comes with a 6.31" LTPO AMOLED panel, 1.5K resolution, and a smooth 120Hz refresh rate. Real-world brightness testing on this same panel type has hit around 1,800 nits in auto mode, so outdoor visibility is genuinely excellent.

Powered by the Dimensity 9500, this is a proper flagship chip, so gaming, multitasking, and heavy apps all run buttery smooth. No compromises here, it's built to handle anything you throw at it.

The headline act is a 200MP 1/1.4" main sensor paired with a 50MP ultrawide and 50MP telephoto, plus a 50MP ZEISS-tuned selfie camera. This is one of the most capable camera setups in its class, low light and zoom shots both hold up impressively well.

The 6040mAh battery (5360mAh in European units due to shipping regulations) comfortably lasts a full day of mixed use. 90W wired charging fills it in around 48 minutes, and it even supports 40W wireless charging.

Yes to 5G, NFC, and wireless charging (40W). eSIM support and Wi-Fi 7 aren't officially confirmed for this model, so treat those as unconfirmed for now.

Yes, it's rated IP68 and IP69, meaning solid protection against dust, submersion, and even hot high-pressure water jets. That's a rare combo at this price tier.

It's available in 12GB/256GB and 16GB/512GB variants in most markets, with a 16GB/1TB option in select regions like China. Storage isn't expandable, so pick based on how much you actually need upfront.

Yes, it records 4K video up to 120fps, plus 1080p up to 240fps for slow-motion shots. 8K recording isn't confirmed on this base model, that's reserved for the Pro and Ultra variants.

16 + 512 GB =280,000 | 870 $ | 86,000 INR


16 + 1 TB      = 320,000 | 980 $ | 97,000 INR
Scroll to Top