Oppo Reno 16 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Why Consider Each
An overview of the main advantages of each phone
Reasons to consider the Oppo Reno 16 Pro
- 4.2x better Front Camera (50 MP vs 12 MP)
- 78% higher Charging Watts (80 W vs 45 W)
- 38% higher Peak Brightness (3600 nits vs 2600 nits)
- 34% larger Battery (6700 mAh vs 5000 mAH)
- 29% higher HBM Brightness (~1800 nits vs ~1400 nits)
- 20% higher Refresh Rate (144 Hz vs 120 Hz)
- 19% lighter Weight (188 g or 191 g vs 232 g)
- 17% higher Zoom (3.5 x vs 3× / 5×)
- Better Digital Zoom: 120 x vs Not Confirm
- Front Flash: Not confirm
- Includes Wireless Charging
- Includes Reverse Charging
- Includes Reverse Wireless
- Model Number: CPH2863
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
- 18% higher Screen Resolution (1440 x 3120 Pixels vs 1216 x 2640 Pixels)
- 8% bigger Screen Size (6.8 inches vs 6.32 inch)
- Better Screen Type: Dynamic AMOLED 2X vs Amoled
- Faster Storage Type: UFS 4.0 vs UFS 3.1
- Higher Video Recording: 8K@30fps 4K@30/60/120 fps 1080p@240fps vs 4K @ 30/60 fps 1080p @ 30/60/120/480 fps
- IP Rating: ip 68
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Product Name | Oppo Reno 16 Pro | Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra |
| Brand | OPPO | Samsung |
| Official Brand Link | Visit | Visit |
| Mobile Image |
 |
 |
| Price | 255000🚫 PKR | 315000 PKR |
| Price India | ₹82000 🚫 | ₹110000 |
| Price USA | $850 | $1150 |
| Variants Prices | 12 + 512 GB | 12 + 256 GB _______________________________ |
| Display | ||
| Phone Dimensions | 151.2 x 72.4 x 8.2 mm | SM-S928B, SM-S928B/DS |
| Screen Size | 6.32 inch | 6.8 inches |
| Screen Resolution | 1216 x 2640 Pixels | 1440 x 3120 Pixels |
| Refresh Rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Screen Type | Amoled | Dynamic AMOLED 2X |
| Peak Brightness | 3600 nits | 2600 nits |
| HBM Brightness | ~1800 nits | ~1400 nits |
| Performance | ||
| Processor | Dimensity 8550 | Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 |
| Lithography Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Max Clock | 3.4 GHz | 3.39 GHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 Cores | 8 Cores |
| Architecture | 1 x 3.4 GHz Cortex-A725 | 1 x 3.39 GHz Cortex-X4 |
| GPU | Mali-G720 MC8 | Adreno 750 |
| AnTuTu Benchmark | 2.3 M | 2.34 M |
| Bootup Time | - | Not Confirm |
| Memory | ||
| RAM Memory | 12 + 512 GB | 12 + 512 GB |
| RAM Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Storage Type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.0 |
| Card Slot | No | No |
| Variants | 12 + 256 GB | 12 + 256 GB |
| Rear Camera | ||
| Camera | 200 + 50 + 50 MP | 200 + 50 + 12 + 10 MP |
| Image Resolution | 16320 × 12240 pixels | 16000 x 12500 Pixels |
| Camera Sensor | – | 200 MP =Samsung ISOCELL HP2 (main) |
| Zoom | 3.5 x | 3× / 5× |
| Digital Zoom | 120 x | Not Confirm |
| Video Recording | 4K @ 30/60 fps | 8K@30fps |
| Flash | Yes | LED Flash |
| Front Camera | ||
| Front Camera | 50 MP | 12 MP |
| Front Sensor | – | 12 MP = Samsung S5K3LU |
| Front Resolution | 8192 x 6144 Pixels | 4000 × 3000 Pixels |
| Front Recording | 4K @ 30/60 fps | 4K @ 30/60 fps |
| Front Flash | Not confirm | - |
| Battery | ||
| Battery | 6700 mAh | 5000 mAH |
| Charging Watts | 80 W | 45 W |
| Battery Type | Silicon-Carbon | Li-Ion |
| Wireless Charging | No | 25 W |
| Reverse Charging | Yes | - |
| Reverse Wireless | No | 4.5 W |
| Battery Life (PC Mark) | - | - |
| Charging Time | - | - |
| Software | ||
| Model Number | CPH2863 | — |
| Release Date | 25 July, 2026 | 24 January, 2024 |
| Year | 2026 | 2024 |
| Series Name | Oppo Reno Series | S Series |
| Category | Mid Range | Flagship |
| Android OS | Android 17 Now | Android 14 |
| Body | ||
| Weight | 188 g or 191 g | 232 g |
| Build | Frame Aluminum And Glass/plastic Back | Titanium frame, Gorilla Glass Back |
| IP Rating | — | ip 68 |
| Special Features |
| S Pen stylus with Bluetooth integration |
| Connectivity | ||
| SIM | Nano-SIM / E-Sim | Nano-SIM/ E-SIM |
| Network | 4G / 4G+ / 5G | 4G / 4G+ / 5G |
| WiFi | WiFi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.3 v |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Security & Audio | ||
| Speakers | Dual Stereo Speaker | Dual Stereo Speaker |
| Fingerprint | Hyper Sonic Front Finger | Hyper Sonic Front Finger |
| Other Sensors | Accelerometer | Accelerometer |
| Highlights | ||
| Display Highlights |
 |
 |
| Processor Highlights |
 |
 |
| Memory Highlights |
 |
 |
| Camera Highlights |
 |
 |
| Battery Highlights |
 |
 |
| Verdict | ||
| Pros | ✅ AMOLED Display 📱 | 200MP Camera 📸 |
| Cons | ❌ No Headphone Jack 🎧 | 45W Charging 🔋 |
| Best For | 🎯 Mobile Photography 📸 | S Pen Users ✍️ |
| Not Best For | 🚫 Audiophile Users 🎧 | Fast Charging ⚡ |
| Related Media | ||
| Rival Devices | vivo X300 FE | vivo X300 Pro |
| Unboxing | ||
| Mobile Disassembly | ||
| PUBG Gaming Test | ||
| Camera Test | ||
Cast your vote
So, which phone would you choose?
Total votes: 0
This comparison covers specs and pricing for 50+ countries — select your country next to the search bar to see local pricing based on the live USD rate. Prices can vary by region due to local taxes, import duties, and retailer markups.
How the Comparison Tool Works