Huawei Pura 90 Pro Max Specs, Price, Camera, Battery & Best Review (2026)

Q: What is the price of Huawei Pura 90 Pro Max in the USA, India, and Pakistan?

12 + 256 GB | ~₹150,000 | ~$1200 16 + 512 GB| ~₹175,000 | ~$ 1400 | 16 + 1 TB | ~₹200,000 | ~$ 1600 | 670,000 PKR

✪ Huawei Pura 90 Pro Max ✪

Last Time Update : 23 October, 2026

United States

1300USD

…i

Pakistan (PKR)

370000PKR

India (INR)

110000INR

Compare Mobiles

Add us as a preferred source on Google Search

✪ Huawei Pura 90 Pro Max ✪

Quick Specs

Display: 6.9 inchOLED120 Hz
Processor: Kirin 9030S2.7 GHz
RAM & Storage: 12 + 512 GB
Rear Camera: 200 + 50 + 40 MP
Front Camera: 13 MP
Battery & Charging: 6000 mAh100 W80 W Wireless

Full Specification

IMPORTANT INFORMATION

Specifications Disclaimer

NOTICE

Specifications are collected from official manufacturers and trusted sources. Actual details may vary by region, model variant, or software updates. We strive for accuracy but cannot guarantee error-free information.

Basic Info

Mobile: Huawei Pura 90 Pro Max
Model: SCA-AL00
Series: Pura Series
Category: Flagship
Release Date: 29 April,2026
Year: 2026

Connectivity

SIM: Nano-SIM / E-Sim
Network: 4G / 4G+ / 5G
WiFi: WiFi 7
Bluetooth: 6.0
NFC: Yes
OS: HarmonyOS 6.1

Body

Dimensions: 164 x 77.1 x 8.1 mm
Build: Frame Aluminum And Glass Back
Weight: 230 g

Screen Size: 6.9 inch
Resolution: 1308 x 2880 Pixels
Type: OLED
Refresh Rate: 120 Hz
Peak Brightness: 5000 nits
HBM Brightness: Not Confirm

Processor Specs

Processor

Kirin 9030S

Processor Link

Kirin 9030S

Max Clock

2.7 GHz

Lithography

5 nm

GPU

Maleoon 935F

CPU Cores

8 Cores

Antutu v11

1.6 M

Antutu v10

1.2 M

Architecture

1 x 2.7 GHz Big
3 x 2.15 GHz Mid
4 x 1.62 GHz Little

RAM & ROM Specs

RAM Memory

12 + 512 GB

RAM Type

LPDDR5X

Storage Type

UFS 4.1

SD Card

Variants

12 +256 GB
12 +512 GB
16 +512 GB
16 +1 TB

Camera Specs

Rear Camera

200 + 50 + 40 MP

Front Camera

13 MP

Sensors

Camera Sensors

200 MP =Smartsens SCC80XS
50 MP = Omnivision 950L LightHunter
40 MP = Not Confirm

Front Sensors

–

Recording FPS

Main Recording

4K @ 30/60 fps
1080p @ 60/960 fps

Front Recording

4K @ 30/60 fps
1080p @ 60/960 fps

Zoom

Optical Zoom

4 x

Digital Zoom

100 x

Flash

Yes

Front Flash

Screen Flash

Battery Specs

Capacity

6000 mAh

Fast Charging

100 W

Wireless Charging

80 W

Battery Type

Silicon-Carbon

Reverse

Reverse Wired

18 W

Other

Charging Time

30-40 m (0% To 100%)

Other Specs

Audio & Sensors

Speaker

Dual Stereo Speaker

Fingerprint Sensor

Hyper Sonic Front Finger

Special Features

BDS Satellite Calling and Messaging (China only)
Kunlun Glass 2 protection
Vapor chamber cooling
Always-On Display, DCI-P3 wide color gamut

BASIC INFO

Mobile

Huawei Pura 90 Pro Max

Model

SCA-AL00

Series

Pura Series

Verify Mobile Specifications

Official information & trusted references

Trusted Specification Sources

Cross-reference · 4 sources

Links open third-party websites. The Purple ticks are a design marker only; they do not mean a source has verified these specifications or endorses FSL-Specs.

Last Time Update : 23 October, 2026

Highlights & Review Of Huawei Pura 90 Pro Max

Display Highlights

The Huawei Pura 90 Pro Max 12GB/512GB China variant has a 6.9-inch LTPO OLED display with 2880 × 1308 resolution, 460 ppi, adaptive 1–120Hz refresh rate, 10.7 billion colours, P3 wide colour gamut and anti-reflective Kunlun Glass. Huawei does not publish a peak-brightness figure for this panel, so no brightness claim should be added.

The vivo X300 Pro 16GB/512GB uses a 6.78-inch LTPO AMOLED display at 2800 × 1260, 452 ppi, with adaptive 1–120Hz refresh rate and 4,500-nit peak brightness. It also supports HDR10+, HDR Vivid, Dolby Vision and 2,160Hz PWM dimming. Its LTPO range starts at 1Hz, matching the Huawei’s minimum, but it offers a higher documented peak brightness

The Xiaomi 17T Pro 12GB/512GB has a 6.83-inch, 2772 × 1280 AMOLED display with 447 ppi, 144Hz refresh rate, 12-bit colour, Dolby Vision, HDR10+ and 3,500-nit peak brightness. Its 144Hz ceiling makes it the smoothest option for supported games and scrolling, although its 1.5K resolution is less sharp than the Huawei and Samsung panels.

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra 12GB/256GB offers the sharpest panel here: a 6.9-inch Dynamic AMOLED 2X display at 3120 × 1440 Quad HD+ resolution, adaptive 120Hz refresh rate, and S Pen support. Samsung’s Pakistan specification page confirms the display size, Quad HD+ resolution, 120Hz refresh rate and S Pen support, but does not list peak brightness on that page.

Phone and variant	Display	Resolution	Refresh rate	Key advantage
Huawei Pura 90 Pro Max, 12GB/512GB	6.9-inch LTPO OLED	2880 × 1308	1–120Hz	Large flat OLED and Kunlun Glass
vivo X300 Pro, 16GB/512GB	6.78-inch LTPO AMOLED	2800 × 1260	1–120Hz	4,500-nit peak brightness
Xiaomi 17T Pro, 12GB/512GB	6.83-inch AMOLED	2772 × 1280	Up to 144Hz	Highest refresh rate
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra, 12GB/256GB	6.9-inch Dynamic AMOLED 2X	3120 × 1440	1–120Hz	Sharpest Quad HD+ panel and S Pen

At the prices you supplied, the Huawei is PKR 370,000–400,000, the Vivo X300 Pro PKR 340,000, the Xiaomi 17T Pro PKR 268,000, and the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra PKR 390,000. These are retailer figures from your brief; public Pakistani listings can differ by seller, warranty and PTA status.

Verdict: The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra has the sharpest display and adds S Pen support, while the Xiaomi 17T Pro leads on 144Hz motion; the Huawei Pura 90 Pro Max offers a large 120Hz LTPO OLED panel, and the vivo X300 Pro has the highest documented peak brightness.

Performance Highlights

The Huawei Pura 90 Pro Max 12GB/512GB China variant uses the Kirin 9030S chipset, running HarmonyOS 6.1 with 12GB RAM and 512GB internal storage. In AnTuTu v11, it scored 1,617,928, with 599,837 CPU, 301,831 GPU, 370,488 memory and 345,772 UX points.

The vivo X300 Pro 16GB/512GB runs the MediaTek Dimensity 9500, paired with 16GB LPDDR5X Ultra RAM and 512GB UFS 4.1 storage. GSMArena measured 2,982,875 in AnTuTu v11, making it approximately 84% faster than the Huawei in the cited results.

The Xiaomi 17T Pro 12GB/512GB also uses the Dimensity 9500, with a maximum CPU clock of 4.21GHz and Mali-G1 Ultra graphics. Its GSMArena AnTuTu v11 score is 3,352,325, about 107% higher than the Huawei and 12% higher than the Vivo X300 Pro.

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra 12GB/256GB uses the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy, with CPU cores reaching 4.74GHz. GSMArena recorded 3,892,165 in AnTuTu v11, placing it approximately 141% above the Huawei, 31% above the Vivo X300 Pro, and 16% above the Xiaomi 17T Pro.

Phone and variant	Chipset	AnTuTu v11	Difference vs Huawei
Huawei Pura 90 Pro Max, 12GB/512GB	Kirin 9030S	1,617,928	Baseline
vivo X300 Pro, 16GB/512GB	Dimensity 9500	2,982,875	About 84% higher
Xiaomi 17T Pro, 12GB/512GB	Dimensity 9500	3,352,325	About 107% higher
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra, 12GB/256GB	Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy	3,892,165	About 141% higher

These are benchmark results, not guaranteed scores for every retail unit. Software, temperature, background activity and test conditions can change results, so percentages should be treated as approximate comparisons rather than fixed real-world gains.

Verdict: The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is the performance leader at 3,892,165 AnTuTu v11 points, while the Xiaomi 17T Pro and vivo X300 Pro use the same Dimensity 9500 platform; the Huawei Pura 90 Pro Max is substantially behind at 1,617,928 despite its premium camera positioning.

Memory & Storage Highlights

The Huawei Pura 90 Pro Max 12GB/512GB China variant has 12GB RAM and 512GB internal storage. Huawei confirms the configuration but does not state the RAM or storage technology, and the phone does not support memory-card expansion.

The vivo X300 Pro 16GB/512GB offers 16GB LPDDR5X Ultra RAM and 512GB UFS 4.1 storage. It has the most RAM in this comparison, which can help with heavy multitasking, large games and keeping more apps open.

Phone and variant	RAM	Storage	microSD
Huawei Pura 90 Pro Max, 12GB/512GB	12GB; type not stated in the cited official specification	512GB; type not stated in the cited official specification	No
vivo X300 Pro, 16GB/512GB	16GB LPDDR5X Ultra	512GB UFS 4.1	No
Xiaomi 17T Pro, 12GB/512GB	12GB LPDDR5X, 9,600Mbps	512GB UFS 4.1	No
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra, 12GB/256GB	12GB; type not stated in the cited official page	256GB; type not stated in the cited official page	No

The Xiaomi 17T Pro 12GB/512GB matches the Huawei’s RAM and storage capacity while specifying LPDDR5X at 9,600Mbps and UFS 4.1 storage. The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra 12GB/256GB matches the 12GB RAM capacity but has only 256GB storage in this variant.

None of these phones supports microSD expansion, so storage cannot be increased later. Actual usable capacity is lower than the advertised total because the operating system and preinstalled software occupy part of the internal storage.

Verdict: The vivo X300 Pro leads on RAM with 16GB, while the Huawei Pura 90 Pro Max and Xiaomi 17T Pro offer the best 12GB/512GB balance; the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra 12GB/256GB has the least storage in this comparison.

Camera Highlights

The Huawei Pura 90 Pro Max 12GB/512GB China variant has a 50MP 1/1.28-inch main camera with f/1.4–f/4.0 variable aperture, OIS and LOFIC high-dynamic-range technology. Its 200MP 1/2.8-inch RYYB periscope telephoto has f/2.6 aperture, OIS, 4× optical zoom and telephoto macro support. Huawei also includes a 40MP f/2.2 ultrawide and a 13MP f/2.0 autofocus front camera.

The vivo X300 Pro 16GB/512GB uses a 50MP Sony LYT-828 main sensor at 1/1.28 inch, f/1.57 aperture and OIS, paired with a 200MP 3.5× OIS periscope telephoto. Its 50MP Samsung ISOCELL JN1 autofocus ultrawide and 50MP front camera complete a three-lens system. Vivo specifies rear video up to 8K at 30fps and 4K at 120fps, with front video up to 4K at 30fps.

Phone and variant	Main camera	Telephoto	Ultrawide	Front camera	Rear video
Huawei Pura 90 Pro Max, 12GB/512GB	50MP, 1/1.28-inch, f/1.4–f/4.0, OIS, LOFIC	200MP, f/2.6, OIS, 4× optical	40MP, f/2.2	13MP, f/2.0, AF	Up to 4K
vivo X300 Pro, 16GB/512GB	50MP Sony LYT-828, 1/1.28-inch, f/1.57, OIS	200MP, f/2.7, OIS, 3.5× optical	50MP Samsung JN1, 1/2.76-inch, f/2.0, AF	50MP, f/2.0, AF	Up to 8K/30fps, 4K/120fps
Xiaomi 17T Pro, 12GB/512GB	50MP Light Fusion 950, 1/1.31-inch, f/1.67, OIS	50MP, f/3.0, OIS, 5× optical	12MP, f/2.2, 120°	32MP	Up to 8K/30fps, 4K/120fps
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra, 12GB/256GB	200MP, f/1.4, OIS	50MP, f/2.9, OIS, 5× optical	50MP, f/1.9	12MP, f/2.2	Up to 8K/30fps, 4K/120fps

The Xiaomi 17T Pro 12GB/512GB uses a 50MP Light Fusion 950 main camera with a 1/1.31-inch sensor, f/1.67 aperture, OIS and Leica Summilux optics. Its 50MP 5× OIS periscope telephoto provides the longest native zoom reach in this group, while its 12MP ultrawide and 32MP front camera complete the setup. Xiaomi lists rear video up to 8K at 30fps and 4K at 120fps, with front video up to 4K at 30fps.

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra 12GB/256GB uses a 200MP f/1.4 OIS main camera, a 50MP 5× OIS telephoto, a 50MP ultrawide, and a 12MP front camera. Samsung specifies rear video up to 8K at 30fps and 4K at 120fps, and its four-lens setup including a separate 3× telephoto gives it the most versatile hardware configuration here.

The Huawei’s main camera matches the Vivo’s 1/1.28-inch sensor size, but Huawei adds a variable aperture and LOFIC technology for high-dynamic-range scenes. The Vivo’s 200MP telephoto has a much larger 1/1.4-inch sensor than Huawei’s 1/2.8-inch telephoto, which should help low-light zoom shots, while the Xiaomi’s 5× lens offers the greatest native magnification.

Verdict: The vivo X300 Pro has the strongest documented telephoto sensor at 200MP and 1/1.4-inch, the Xiaomi 17T Pro offers the longest 5× optical zoom, and the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra provides the most versatile four-lens system; the Huawei Pura 90 Pro Max is strongest for its variable-aperture main camera and 4× periscope zoom.

Battery & Charging Highlights

The Huawei Pura 90 Pro Max 12GB/512GB China variant has a 6,000mAh typical battery and supports 100W wired charging, 80W wireless charging, 18W wired reverse charging, and wireless reverse charging. Huawei states that maximum 100W wired and 80W wireless charging require its compatible charger and wireless-charging accessories.

The vivo X300 Pro 16GB/512GB has a 6,510mAh typical battery, with 90W wired charging and 40W wireless charging. Vivo specifies a single-cell battery with typical capacity of 6,510mAh and rated capacity of 6,375mAh.

Phone and variant	Battery capacity	Wired charging	Wireless charging	Reverse charging
Huawei Pura 90 Pro Max, 12GB/512GB	6,000mAh typical	100W	80W	18W wired, wireless reverse
vivo X300 Pro, 16GB/512GB	6,510mAh typical	90W	40W	Not stated in the cited official specification
Xiaomi 17T Pro, 12GB/512GB	7,000mAh typical	100W	50W	22.5W wired reverse
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra, 12GB/256GB	5,000mAh	60W	25W	4.5W wireless reverse

The Xiaomi 17T Pro 12GB/512GB has the largest battery at 7,000mAh, with 100W wired and 50W wireless charging. It also supports 22.5W wired reverse charging. Xiaomi notes that the 100W charging capability requires a compatible PPS adapter, and that actual charging performance can vary.

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra 12GB/256GB has the smallest battery at 5,000mAh, with 60W wired and 25W wireless charging. It supports 4.5W wireless reverse charging, but it trails the other three on both battery capacity and charging speed.

The Huawei and Vivo X300 Pro have the closest battery capacities, but the Huawei charges faster on paper at 100W wired and 80W wireless. The Xiaomi offers the best combination of capacity and charging features, while the Samsung is the weakest choice for buyers prioritizing battery endurance or fast charging.

Verdict: The Xiaomi 17T Pro has the largest battery at 7,000mAh with 100W wired and 50W wireless charging; the Huawei Pura 90 Pro Max matches the Vivo’s 6,000mAh capacity but charges much faster, while the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra has the smallest battery and slowest charging in this group.

Final Verdict

At the retailer prices supplied for 11 October 2026, the Xiaomi 17T Pro 12GB/512GB is the strongest all-round choice at PKR 268,000. It combines the Dimensity 9500, a 7,000mAh battery, 100W wired and 50W wireless charging, a 144Hz display, and a 5× Leica periscope telephoto. Its main weakness is a 1.5K display that is less sharp than the Samsung’s Quad HD+ panel.

The Huawei Pura 90 Pro Max 12GB/512GB, at PKR 370,000–400,000, is a camera-first flagship with a 50MP variable-aperture main camera, 200MP 4× OIS periscope telephoto, 6,000mAh battery, 100W wired and 80W wireless charging. However, its Kirin 9030S is substantially behind the rivals in the cited AnTuTu v11 results, and it is a China-market model, so buyers should verify PTA status, Google-services availability and warranty.

The vivo X300 Pro 16GB/512GB, at PKR 340,000, is best for camera-focused buyers who want more RAM and a proven 3.5× periscope zoom system. It has a smaller battery and older Dimensity 9400 chipset, but its tested endurance was slightly ahead of the HONOR 600 Pro in GSMArena’s results.

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra 12GB/256GB, at PKR 390,000, is the most versatile premium all-rounder with the sharpest display, S Pen support and strongest cited performance, but it has the smallest battery and costs the most.

Quick Ranking Table

Rank	Phone and variant	Price	Best for	Main trade-off
1	Xiaomi 17T Pro, 12GB/512GB	PKR 268,000	Best overall value, performance, battery and 5× zoom	Less sharp 1.5K display
2	vivo X300 Pro, 16GB/512GB	PKR 340,000	Best camera-focused choice, 16GB RAM and 3.5× periscope	Older chipset and 90W charging
3	Huawei Pura 90 Pro Max, 12GB/512GB	PKR 370,000–400,000	Best variable-aperture main camera and 4× periscope zoom	Weakest benchmark performance and China-market software
4	Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra, 12GB/256GB	PKR 390,000	Best display, S Pen and software ecosystem	Smallest battery, highest price

Bottom line: Choose the Xiaomi 17T Pro for the best value and balanced flagship experience; choose the vivo X300 Pro for camera versatility, or the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra if its display, S Pen and ecosystem justify the premium.