OPPO Reno 15F Specs, Price, Camera, Battery & Best Review (2026)

Q: What RAM and storage variants are available for OPPO Reno 15F ?

It comes mainly in 12 + 512/256GB and 8+512/128 GB

Q: What is the price of OPPO Reno 15F in the USA, India, and Pakistan?

8 + 256 GB | ~₹38,000 | ~$380 | ~ 117,000 PKR

✪ Oppo Reno 15F ✪

Last Time Update : 21 October, 2026

United States

400USD

…i

Pakistan (PKR)

118000PKR

India (INR)

38000INR

Compare Mobiles

Add us as a preferred source on Google Search

✪ Oppo Reno 15F ✪

Quick Specs

Display: 6.57 inchAmoled120 Hz
Processor: Snapdragon 6 Gen 12.2 GHz
RAM & Storage: 8+256 GB
Rear Camera: 50 + 8 + 2 MP
Front Camera: 50 MP
Battery & Charging: 7000 mAh80 W

Full Specification

IMPORTANT INFORMATION

Specifications Disclaimer

NOTICE

Specifications are collected from official manufacturers and trusted sources. Actual details may vary by region, model variant, or software updates. We strive for accuracy but cannot guarantee error-free information.

Basic Info

Mobile: Oppo Reno 15F
Model: CPH2801
Series: Oppo Reno Series
Category: Mid Range
Release Date: 9 January,2026
Year: 2026

Connectivity

SIM: Dual Nano-SIM
Network: 4G / 4G+ / 5G
WiFi: Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth: 5.1
NFC: Yes
OS: Android 17 Now

Body

Dimensions: 158.2 x 74.9 x 8.1 mm
Build: Frame Aluminum And Glass Back
Weight: 195 g

Screen Size: 6.57 inch
Resolution: 1080 x 2372 Pixels
Type: Amoled
Refresh Rate: 120 Hz
Peak Brightness: -
HBM Brightness: 1400 nits

Processor Specs

Processor

Snapdragon 6 Gen 1

Max Clock

2.2 GHz

Lithography

4 nm

GPU

Adreno 710

CPU Cores

8 Cores

Antutu v11

865 K

Antutu v10

600 K

Bootup Time

Architecture

4 x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A78
4 x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55

RAM & ROM Specs

RAM Memory

8+256 GB

RAM Type

LPDDR4X

Storage Type

UFS 3.1

SD Card

Yes

Variants

8 + 256/128 GB
12 + 256/512 GB

Camera Specs

Rear Camera

50 + 8 + 2 MP

Front Camera

50 MP

Sensors

Camera Sensors

–

Front Sensors

–

Recording FPS

Main Recording

4K @ 30 fps
1080p @ 30/60 fps

Front Recording

4K @ 30 fps
1080p @ 30 fps

Zoom

Optical Zoom

3.5 x

Digital Zoom

Flash

Yes

Front Flash

Screen Flash

Battery Specs

Capacity

7000 mAh

Fast Charging

80 W

Wireless Charging

Battery Type

Silicon-Carbon

Reverse

Reverse Wired

Yes

Reverse Wireless

Other

Battery PC Marks

Charging Time

65-75 m (0% To 100%)

Other Specs

Audio & Sensors

Speaker

Dual Stereo Speaker

Fingerprint Sensor

Front Finger

Other Sensors

Accelerometer
Gyroscope
Proximity
Compass
etc.

Special Features

–

BASIC INFO

Mobile

Oppo Reno 15F

Model

CPH2801

Series

Oppo Reno Series

Verify Mobile Specifications

Official information & trusted references

Official Manufacturer WebsiteExplore the original product information (opens in a new tab)

Trusted Specification Sources

Cross-reference · 5 sources

Links open third-party websites. The Purple ticks are a design marker only; they do not mean a source has verified these specifications or endorses FSL-Specs.

Last Time Update : 21 October, 2026

Highlights & Review Of Oppo Reno 15F

Display Highlights

The Oppo Reno 15F features a 6.57-inch AMOLED display with 1080 x 2372 resolution and a 120Hz refresh rate, backed by 1400 nits HBM brightness, though Oppo hasn’t disclosed a separate peak brightness figure for this panel. At 116,000 PKR, it has the smallest screen of the four phones here, but resolution stays sharp enough for everyday reading, browsing, and video.

The Tecno Camon 50 Ultra 5G (120,000 PKR) steps up to a 6.78-inch AMOLED panel at 1208 x 2644 resolution with a 144Hz refresh rate, noticeably smoother for scrolling and gaming than the Reno 15F’s 120Hz cap. Its 2400 nits peak brightness also outshines the Reno 15F’s 1400 nits HBM rating, meaning outdoor visibility should be stronger on the Camon 50 Ultra.

The Samsung Galaxy A56 5G (120,000 PKR) uses a 6.7-inch Super AMOLED screen at 1080 x 2340 resolution, matching the Reno 15F’s resolution class and staying at the same 120Hz refresh rate. Its 1900 nits peak brightness paired with 1200 nits HBM puts it close to the Reno 15F on paper, so daily viewing between these two should feel largely similar.

The Vivo V70 FE (124,000 PKR) offers the largest and sharpest panel of the group, a 6.83-inch AMOLED display at 1260 x 2800 resolution, still capped at 120Hz, with 1900 nits HBM brightness, meaning it edges out the Reno 15F in both screen real estate and outdoor legibility.

Verdict: Tecno Camon 50 Ultra 5G’s 144Hz refresh rate and stronger peak brightness make it the sharper pick for buyers who prioritize screen performance in this price bracket. The oppo Reno 15F’s display holds its own on resolution and panel quality,

Performance Highlights

The Oppo Reno 15F runs on Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, an 8-core, 4nm chip pairing four Cortex-A78 cores at 2.2GHz with four Cortex-A55 efficiency cores, backed by the Adreno 710 GPU. It posts 865K on AnTuTu v11, a mid-range result built more for everyday multitasking than heavy gaming.

The Tecno Camon 50 Ultra 5G (120,000 PKR) uses the MediaTek Dimensity 7400, also on 4nm, with a faster 2.6GHz Cortex-A78 cluster and the Mali-G615 MP2 GPU. Its 900K AnTuTu score edges past the Reno 15F’s 865K, meaning slightly more headroom for demanding apps and multitasking, though the real-world gap stays modest.

The Samsung Galaxy A56 5G (120,000 PKR) is the clear performance leader here, powered by the Exynos 1580 (4nm) with the Xclipse 540 GPU. Independent AnTuTu v11 results from Kimovil and NanoReview both place it around 1.25 million points, meaning it comfortably outpaces both the Reno 15F and the Camon 50 Ultra 5G in raw processing power, a real advantage for heavier gaming and multitasking.

The Vivo V70 FE (124,000 PKR) runs the MediaTek Dimensity 7360 Turbo (4nm) with a Mali-G615 MC2 GPU. Its AnTuTu v11 scores vary noticeably by source, from around 961K up to 1.18 million, so its exact standing against the Reno 15F is harder to pin down precisely, though most figures put it at least on par with or slightly ahead of it.

Verdict: For raw benchmark performance, the Samsung Galaxy A56 5G is the clear winner of this group, and buyers who prioritize gaming and multitasking power over camera or battery should lean toward it instead of the Oppo Reno 15F.

Memory & Storage Highlights

The Oppo Reno 15F ships in this comparison with 8GB LPDDR4X RAM and 256GB UFS 3.1 storage, and it’s the only phone here that keeps a microSD card slot, letting owners expand storage cheaply instead of paying more for a bigger internal tier.

The Tecno Camon 50 Ultra 5G (120,000 PKR) steps up to 12GB LPDDR5 RAM with 256GB UFS 3.1 storage, meaning app switching and background multitasking should feel noticeably snappier than on the Reno 15F’s older LPDDR4X memory. There’s no microSD slot, though, so its 256GB tier is fixed for good.

The Samsung Galaxy A56 5G (120,000 PKR) also comes with 12GB RAM and 256GB UFS 3.1 storage, though Samsung hasn’t officially confirmed the exact RAM type for this configuration. Like the Camon 50 Ultra 5G, it drops the microSD slot entirely, a trade-off Samsung made starting with this generation of the A-series.

The Vivo V70 FE (124,000 PKR) matches the other rivals with 12GB LPDDR5 RAM and 256GB UFS 3.1 storage, giving it the same fast-memory advantage over the Reno 15F. It also skips microSD expansion, keeping storage fixed at whatever tier is purchased.

Across the group, the Reno 15F is the only phone pairing a lower 8GB RAM baseline with the flexibility of expandable storage, while all three rivals trade that flexibility for higher RAM counts and faster LPDDR5 memory.

Verdict: Buyers who want raw multitasking speed should lean toward the 12GB LPDDR5 rivals, but anyone who values expandable storage over extra RAM will find the Reno 15F’s microSD support a genuinely useful practical advantage.

Camera Highlights

The Oppo Reno 15F carries a 50MP main camera paired with an 8MP ultrawide and a 2MP macro lens, backed by OIS on the primary sensor, though Oppo hasn’t disclosed the sensor brand or model for any of the three. The 50MP front camera is similarly undisclosed on sensor hardware. Rear video tops out at 4K at 30fps (1080p at 30/60fps), while the front camera also caps at 4K at 30fps.

The Tecno Camon 50 Ultra 5G (120,000 PKR) is the most transparent of the group, confirming a 50MP Sony LYT-700C main sensor with OIS, a 50MP telephoto offering 3x optical zoom, and an 8MP ultrawide. That’s verifiable hardware the Reno 15F can’t currently match. Its 50MP front camera lacks a disclosed sensor, but both rear and front video reach 4K at 60fps, ahead of the Reno 15F’s 30fps cap on both ends.

The Samsung Galaxy A56 5G (120,000 PKR) uses a confirmed 50MP Sony IMX906 main sensor at f/1.8 with OIS, a 12MP Sony IMX258 ultrawide, and a 5MP macro. The front camera is a 12MP shooter. Video recording matches the Reno 15F at 4K/30fps on both rear and front.

The Vivo V70 FE (124,000 PKR) leads on resolution with a 200MP Samsung ISOCELL HP5 main sensor at f/1.9 with OIS, paired with an 8MP ultrawide that lacks autofocus. Its 32MP front camera is the sharpest selfie shooter here. Video recording is capped at 4K at 30fps on both rear and front, matching the Reno 15F rather than the faster Camon 50 Ultra 5G.

Verdict: the Vivo V70 FE’s 200MP sensor and 32MP selfie camera make it the strongest pick for detail-focused shooters. . For buyers who care about verified camera hardware, the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra 5G and Samsung Galaxy A56 5G both offer confirmed sensors with OIS, giving more confidence than the Reno 15F’s undisclosed setup.

Battery & Charging Highlights

The Oppo Reno 15F packs a 7000mAh Silicon-Carbon battery with 80W wired charging, reaching 0-100% in roughly 65-75 minutes. It supports reverse wired charging but skips wireless charging entirely. At 116,000 PKR, this is one of the largest capacities in the group paired with genuinely fast charging.

The Tecno Camon 50 Ultra 5G (120,000 PKR) uses a smaller 6500mAh Li-Po battery but adds something the Reno 15F doesn’t offer, 20W wireless charging, alongside 45W wired charging that takes about 1 hour 25 minutes for a full top-up. It also supports reverse wired charging. The trade-off is clear, less capacity and slower wired speeds than the Reno 15F, but with wireless convenience the Reno 15F lacks.

The Samsung Galaxy A56 5G (120,000 PKR) has the smallest battery here at 5000mAh, charging at 45W wired, reaching 65% in 30 minutes and 100% in about 68 minutes. It has no wireless charging and no confirmed reverse wireless charging, meaning it trails the Reno 15F on both capacity and charging speed despite being the most benchmark-powerful phone in this comparison.

The Vivo V70 FE (124,000 PKR) matches the oppo Reno 15F’s 7000mAh capacity but charges faster, with 90W wired charging completing a full charge in about 60 minutes. It supports reverse wired charging and bypass charging for gaming, though like the Reno 15F, it has no wireless charging.

Verdict: The Vivo V70 FE offers the best overall battery package here, matching the Reno 15F’s large capacity while charging noticeably faster, and buyers chasing all-day endurance with quicker top-ups should lean toward it over the oppo Reno 15F.

Final Verdict

Across display, processor, memory, camera, and battery, no single phone in this comparison dominates every category, but the Vivo V70 FE (124,000 PKR) comes closest to an all-rounder, leading on camera resolution with its 200MP main sensor and offering the strongest battery package with a 7000mAh capacity charging at 90W, matching the Reno 15F’s endurance while charging noticeably faster.

The Samsung Galaxy A56 5G (120,000 PKR) is the clear performance king with its Exynos 1580 scoring roughly 1.25 million on AnTuTu, well ahead of every other phone here, though it settles for the smallest 5000mAh battery and no microSD support. The Tecno Camon 50 Ultra 5G (120,000 PKR) takes the display crown with its 144Hz refresh rate and 2400 nits peak brightness, and it’s the only phone besides the Reno 15F offering wireless charging.

Ranked by overall value across this comparison, the Vivo V70 FE takes the top spot for its balance of camera, battery, and display, followed by the Samsung Galaxy A56 5G for raw performance, then the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra 5G for its sharper, brighter screen, with the Oppo Reno 15F trailing the group on processor power and camera transparency despite being the cheapest option and the only one offering expandable storage.

Rank	Phone	Price (PKR)
1	Vivo V70 FE	124,000
2	Samsung Galaxy A56 5G	120,000
3	Tecno Camon 50 Ultra 5G	120,000
4	Oppo Reno 15F	116,000

Verdict: The Vivo V70 FE ranks first for the best overall balance across camera, battery, and display, the Samsung Galaxy A56 5G comes in second for its clear performance lead, the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra 5G takes third for its sharper, faster display, and the Oppo Reno 15F rounds out the list as the most budget-friendly option with expandable storage.

Bottom line: If budget allows the extra 8,000 PKR over the oppo Reno 15F, the Vivo V70 FE is the strongest all-round pick in this group, but the oppo Reno 15F remains a reasonable choice for buyers prioritizing price and microSD expansion over raw performance.