Tecno Pova Slim Specs, Price, Camera, Battery & Best Review (2026)

Q: What display type does Tecno Pova Slim use, and how bright is its screen?

The Tecno Pova Slim uses a 6.78-inch AMOLED display with a 1224 x 2720 pixel resolution running at 144Hz. 4500 nits Peak Brightness

Q: Which processor is used in Tecno Pova Slim?

The Pova Slim runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 6400 built on a 6nm process with two performance cores at 2.5 GHz and six efficiency cores at 2.0 GHz, backed by a Mali-G57 MC2 GPU.

Q: How many megapixels are main and front cameras of Tecno Pova Slim?

The main rear camera is 50MP using a Sony sensor that captures images up to 8160 x 6144 pixels , 13 MP Front Camera . The Sony sensor choice matters at this price. Video records at 2K 30fps and 1080p 60fps

Q: What is battery capacity and Fast Charging of Tecno Pova Slim ?

The Pova Slim carries a 5160mAh silicon-carbon battery in with 45 Watts Fast Charging.

Q: What is Tecno Pova Slim price in Pakistan, India, and USD?

8 + 256 GB₨70,000 PKR | ₹21,000 | $ 240

✪ Tecno Pova Slim ✪

United States

$240 USD

…

Pakistan (PKR)

70,000 PKR

India (INR)

₹21,000 INR

Compare Mobiles

Add us as a preferred source on Google Search

✪ Tecno Pova Slim ✪

Last Time Update : 7 October, 2026

images of Tecno Pova Slim

Quick Specifications

Full Specification

BASIC INFO

Mobile

Tecno Pova Slim

Model

KM9

Series

Pova Series

Highlights & Review Of Tecno Pova Slim

Display Review:

The Tecno Pova Slim, priced at approximately PKR 70,000 as the latest closing price, features a 6.78-inch curved AMOLED display with 1224 × 2720 resolution, approximately 440 ppi, and a 144Hz refresh rate. Its display is sharper and smoother than the 120Hz FHD+ AMOLED panels on the Tecno Pova 6 Pro and Infinix GT 10 Pro. Available specifications list up to 1600 nits HBM brightness and 4500 nits peak brightness, although HBM and peak figures represent different brightness measurements and should not be treated as identical.

The Tecno Pova 6 Pro, available for around PKR 60,000 in the used market, uses a 6.78-inch AMOLED display with 1080 × 2436 resolution, around 393 ppi, and a 120Hz refresh rate. Its listed peak brightness reaches 1300 nits, which is lower than the Pova Slim’s advertised brightness. The Pova 6 Pro still provides strong contrast and smooth scrolling, but it cannot match the Slim’s higher resolution or 144Hz refresh rate.

The Infinix GT 10 Pro, priced at approximately PKR 65,000 used, offers a 6.67-inch 10-bit AMOLED display with 1080 × 2400 resolution, around 395 ppi, and a 120Hz refresh rate. Its official specifications list 900 nits peak brightness and a 360Hz touch-sampling rate, which is useful for gaming input response. However, the screen is smaller, less sharp, and less bright on paper than the Pova Slim’s 1.5K 144Hz panel.

The Infinix Note Edge, available at approximately PKR 92,000 for a box-packed 8GB + 256GB variant, has a 6.78-inch curved AMOLED display with 1208 × 2644 resolution, around 429 ppi, and a 120Hz refresh rate. It supports 700 nits typical brightness, 1600 nits HBM, and 4500 nits peak brightness, along with 2160Hz PWM dimming and Gorilla Glass 7i protection. Its panel is more advanced than the Pova 6 Pro and GT 10 Pro, but the Pova Slim still offers the smoother 144Hz refresh rate and slightly higher pixel density.

Verdict: The Tecno Pova Slim wins the display category with its 1.5K curved AMOLED panel, 144Hz refresh rate, approximately 440 ppi, and high advertised brightness. The Infinix Note Edge is the closest rival for panel quality and protection, while the Pova 6 Pro and GT 10 Pro offer good AMOLED screens but remain behind in resolution, refresh rate, and brightness.

Processor Review:

The Tecno Pova Slim uses the MediaTek Dimensity 6400 5G chipset with 8GB RAM and 256GB storage. The available AnTuTu v11 results are inconsistent: one test reports 600,979 points, while another result records 455,458 points. Because these figures differ substantially, the higher score should not be treated as a guaranteed everyday result. For a fair comparison, the Pova Slim’s observed test range is approximately 455,458 to 600,979 AnTuTu v11 points.

The Tecno Pova 6 Pro, available for approximately PKR 60,000 in the used market, runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 6080 and records an average 552,385 AnTuTu v11 score on NanoReview. Its breakdown is 201,079 CPU, 47,127 GPU, 138,242 memory, and 164,937 UX points. Using the Pova Slim’s NanoReview-style result of 455,458, the Pova 6 Pro is approximately 21.3% faster. However, if the Pova Slim reaches the separate 600,979 result, it would be around 8.8% ahead of the Pova 6 Pro.

The Infinix GT 10 Pro, priced at around PKR 65,000 used, is powered by the MediaTek Dimensity 8050 and achieves an average 1,028,453 AnTuTu v11 score on NanoReview. Its score includes 375,320 CPU, 153,443 GPU, 187,980 memory, and 311,710 UX points. It is approximately 85.6% faster than the Pova 6 Pro, and approximately 125.3% faster than the Pova Slim’s 455,458 result. This is a major difference for demanding games, 3D graphics, and sustained multitasking.

The Infinix Note Edge, available for approximately PKR 92,000 box-packed, uses the MediaTek Dimensity 7100 5G. NanoReview provides an AnTuTu v11 benchmark page for the phone, but the retrieved result does not show a clear average score. Other available test data reports approximately 785,352 AnTuTu v11 points, while Infinix and other listings claim scores above 810,000. Using 785,352, the Note Edge is approximately 71.9% faster than the Pova 6 Pro and 72.4% faster than the Pova Slim’s 455,458 result.

Verdict: The Infinix GT 10 Pro is the clear performance winner with 1,028,453 AnTuTu v11 points, followed by the Infinix Note Edge. The Tecno Pova Slim’s Dimensity 6400 is adequate for daily use, but its conflicting benchmark results make its exact ranking uncertain. The Pova 6 Pro delivers similar mid-range performance at a lower used price, while the GT 10 Pro offers the strongest gaming performance for PKR 65,000.

Ram & Memory Review:

The Tecno Pova Slim in the selected 8GB + 256GB variant offers 8GB physical RAM and 256GB internal storage. Available specifications identify the 256GB model with UFS 2.2 storage, while Tecno also advertises up to 16GB total RAM through an additional 8GB extended-memory feature. The phone has no dedicated microSD card slot, so buyers must rely on the built-in 256GB capacity.

The Tecno Pova 6 Pro, priced at approximately PKR 60,000 in the used market, provides 12GB physical RAM and 256GB UFS 2.2 storage in the selected variant. It therefore has 4GB more physical RAM than the Pova Slim, which is useful for keeping more large applications active during multitasking. The Pova 6 Pro also supports a dedicated microSD card, reportedly up to 1TB, giving it more storage flexibility than the Pova Slim.

The Infinix GT 10 Pro, available for around PKR 65,000 used, comes with 8GB LPDDR4X RAM and 256GB UFS 3.1 storage. Its storage technology is faster than the Pova Slim’s listed UFS 2.2, which can improve application loading, game installation, and file-transfer performance. The GT 10 Pro also supports a dedicated microSD card slot, with expansion listed up to 1TB, so it offers stronger storage flexibility despite having the same physical RAM capacity as the Pova Slim.

The Infinix Note Edge, priced at approximately PKR 92,000 for the box-packed 8GB + 256GB variant, also offers 8GB RAM and 256GB storage. Available specifications identify the storage as UFS 2.2, but a reliable microSD expansion option is not confirmed. It matches the Pova Slim in physical RAM and internal capacity, although its much higher price does not provide a clear memory advantage over the cheaper Pova Slim or the faster UFS 3.1 storage in the GT 10 Pro.

Verdict: The Tecno Pova 6 Pro wins for physical RAM with 12GB, while the Infinix GT 10 Pro has the best storage setup because of UFS 3.1 and microSD support. The Pova Slim is adequate with 8GB + 256GB, but its UFS 2.2 storage and lack of a memory-card slot make it less flexible than both the Pova 6 Pro and GT 10 Pro.

Cameras Review:

The Tecno Pova Slim, available at approximately PKR 70,000, uses a 50MP main camera with PDAF and a 2MP secondary sensor. Its rear camera records up to 1440p at 30fps, while the 13MP selfie camera also supports 1440p at 30fps. The Pova Slim does not have confirmed OIS, so stabilization depends on electronic processing and steady handling. This camera setup is adequate for daylight photos and basic video, but it is less versatile than the 4K-capable Infinix GT 10 Pro.

The Tecno Pova 6 Pro, priced at approximately PKR 60,000 in the used market, has a 108MP main camera, a 2MP depth sensor, and a small auxiliary sensor. Its rear camera records up to 1440p at 30fps, 1080p at 60fps, and 1080p at 30fps. The 32MP front camera supports up to 1440p at 30fps. The Pova 6 Pro does not include confirmed OIS, although electronic stabilization is available for supported recording modes.

The Infinix GT 10 Pro, available for approximately PKR 65,000 used, offers the strongest video hardware in this comparison with a 108MP main camera. It records 4K at 30fps, 1080p at 60fps, and 1080p at 30fps, while slow-motion modes reach 1080p at 120fps and 720p at 240fps. The 32MP selfie camera supports up to 2K at 30fps. The GT 10 Pro does not have OIS, but it provides electronic stabilization and an Ultra Steady mode in supported resolutions.

The Infinix Note Edge, priced at approximately PKR 92,000 for the box-packed 8GB + 256GB variant, has a 50MP main camera with autofocus. The available sources conflict about stabilization: one review identifies the camera as having no OIS, while some specification listings claim OIS. Its consistently reported video modes include 2K at 30fps and 1080p at 60fps, but the OIS claim should be treated as disputed until confirmed by the manufacturer or independent testing. The front camera records up to 2K at 30fps.

Verdict: The Infinix GT 10 Pro wins the camera and video category because it is the only phone here with confirmed 4K at 30fps recording, plus 1080p at 60fps and high-frame-rate slow motion. The Pova 6 Pro follows with a higher-resolution 108MP camera and 1080p 60fps, while the Pova Slim is limited to 1440p 30fps. The Infinix Note Edge offers useful 2K and 1080p modes, but its OIS specification remains disputed.

Battery Review:

The Tecno Pova Slim, priced at approximately PKR 70,000 as the latest closing price, carries a 5160mAh battery with 45W wired charging. Its capacity is slightly higher than the Infinix GT 10 Pro’s 5000mAh cell, but the Slim’s thin body limits it from using the larger 6000mAh and 6500mAh batteries found in the Tecno Pova 6 Pro and Infinix Note Edge. Wireless charging is not supported, and a confirmed full charging time is not consistently published.

The Tecno Pova 6 Pro, available for around PKR 60,000 in the used market, is the strongest battery option for long usage with a 6000mAh battery and 70W wired charging. Tecno’s charging system is advertised at approximately 50% in 19 minutes and 100% in 50 minutes. It also supports 10W reverse wired charging and bypass charging, giving it a useful advantage for gaming while connected to power.

The Infinix GT 10 Pro, priced at approximately PKR 65,000 used, includes a 5000mAh battery and 45W wired charging. Independent testing recorded approximately 73% charge after 30 minutes and a complete charge in around 61 minutes. Its measured 112-hour endurance rating is strong for its capacity, but the phone still provides less battery reserve than the Pova Slim, Pova 6 Pro, and Note Edge.

The Infinix Note Edge, available for around PKR 92,000 for the box-packed 8GB + 256GB variant, has the largest battery here, with a 6500mAh silicon-carbon cell and 45W wired charging. It supports approximately 50% charging in 27 minutes, 10W reverse wired charging, and bypass charging for gaming. Its battery is 1500mAh larger than the Pova 6 Pro and 1340mAh larger than the Pova Slim, but its 45W charging is slower than the Pova 6 Pro’s 70W system.

Verdict: The Infinix Note Edge wins for maximum battery capacity with 6500mAh, while the Tecno Pova 6 Pro provides the best combination of battery size and charging speed through its 6000mAh battery and 70W charging. The Pova Slim and GT 10 Pro offer similar 45W charging, but the Pova Slim has a slightly larger battery. For practical value at the listed prices, the Pova 6 Pro is the strongest battery choice.

Final Verdict :

The Tecno Pova Slim, priced at approximately PKR 70,000 as the latest closing price, is the best choice for buyers who prioritise a thin design, a high-resolution 144Hz curved AMOLED display, and balanced 5G performance. Its Dimensity 6400, 5160mAh battery, 45W charging, and 8GB + 256GB configuration create a modern package, but its camera system is weaker than the Infinix GT 10 Pro and its storage is slower than the GT 10 Pro’s UFS 3.1

The Tecno Pova 6 Pro is the strongest value option at around PKR 60,000 used. It offers 12GB RAM, a 6000mAh battery, 70W charging, a 120Hz AMOLED display, and a 108MP camera. Its Dimensity 6080 is slower than the GT 10 Pro’s Dimensity 8050, but the phone provides more physical RAM, longer battery potential, and faster charging at the lowest price in this comparison.

The Infinix GT 10 Pro is the clear performance and video-recording winner at approximately PKR 65,000 used. Its Dimensity 8050 records an average 1,028,453 AnTuTu v11 score, far above the Pova 6 Pro’s 552,385. It also offers UFS 3.1 storage, 4K at 30fps recording, and strong gaming performance, although its battery is smaller at 5000mAh and its display is limited to 120Hz.

The Infinix Note Edge is the most advanced overall device, but its PKR 92,000 box-packed price makes it difficult to recommend for value. It includes the Dimensity 7100, 8GB LPDDR5X RAM, 256GB UFS 2.2 storage, a 6500mAh battery, and a 1.5K curved AMOLED display. Infinix claims more than 810,000 AnTuTu v11 points, but the phone costs PKR 22,000 more than the Pova Slim and PKR 32,000 more than the Pova 6 Pro.

Bottom line: Choose the Infinix GT 10 Pro for gaming and camera video, the Tecno Pova 6 Pro for the best price-to-battery and RAM balance, the Tecno Pova Slim for its slim 144Hz design, and the Infinix Note Edge only if its premium display, large battery, and newer platform justify the much higher price.

Ranking:

Infinix GT 10 Pro, 8GB + 256GB – PKR 65,000, used market
Tecno Pova 6 Pro, 12GB + 256GB – PKR 60,000, used market
Tecno Pova Slim, 8GB + 256GB – PKR 70,000, latest closing price
Infinix Note Edge, 8GB + 256GB – PKR 92,000, box-packed

Pros And Cons of Tecno Pova Slim

Pros of Mobile

✅144Hz AMOLED display
✅Dimensity 7300 Ultimate
✅ slim design
✅ The 45W charging
✅ The IP64 rating

Cons of Mobile

❌ The lack of OIS
❌ No ultrawide camera
❌ Camera hardware

Best For - Not Best For

Best For

✅ Students
✅ Everyday users
✅ PUBG and BGMI players
✅ Multimedia consumers
✅ Travelers
✅ Users wanting a slim phone
✅ Value-focused buyers

Not Best For

❌ Professional photographers
❌ Hardcore gamers
❌ Mobile videographers
❌ Zoom photography users
❌ Audiophiles
❌ Users seeking flagship materials
❌ Low-light photography lovers

Trailer And Unboxing of Tecno Pova Slim

Disassembly Or Teardown And Gaming Test of Tecno Pova Slim

Camera Test Tecno Pova Slim

Rival Mobiles

Infinix Note Edge
Tecno Pova 6 Pro
Infinix GT 10 Pro
infinix Note 50 Pro 4G
TECNO CAMON Slim 5G
TECNO POVA Curve
Tecno Pova 7 5G
Reno 14 F 5G
Nothing Phone (3a) Lite

Related Comparisions

TECNO Series Row

TECNO Series

FAQs Questions

Faisal Ur Rehman

Faisal Rehman is the founder and editor of FSL Specs, where he publishes in-depth smartphone specifications, comparisons, buying guides, and technology insights. With extensive experience in mobile hardware research and technical analysis, he provides accurate and up-to-date information on Android smartphones, processors, displays, cameras, batteries, performance benchmarks, and software features. His goal is to simplify complex specifications and help readers choose the right device with confidence.

Faisal Ur Rehman

What display type does Tecno Pova Slim use, and how bright is its screen?

The Tecno Pova Slim uses a 6.78-inch AMOLED display with a 1224 x 2720 pixel resolution running at 144Hz. 4500 nits Peak Brightness

Which processor is used in Tecno Pova Slim?

The Pova Slim runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 6400 built on a 6nm process with two performance cores at 2.5 GHz and six efficiency cores at 2.0 GHz, backed by a Mali-G57 MC2 GPU.

What RAM type and storage type does Tecno Pova Slim Use?

The Pova Slim comes in two variants 8GB with 128GB and 8GB with 256GB using LPDDR4X RAM and UFS 2.2 storage.

How many megapixels are main and front cameras of Tecno Pova Slim?

The main rear camera is 50MP using a Sony sensor that captures images up to 8160 x 6144 pixels , 13 MP Front Camera . The Sony sensor choice matters at this price. Video records at 2K 30fps and 1080p 60fps

What is battery capacity and Fast Charging of Tecno Pova Slim ?

The Pova Slim carries a 5160mAh silicon-carbon battery in with 45 Watts Fast Charging.

What is Tecno Pova Slim price in Pakistan, India, and USD?

8 + 256 GB
₨70,000 PKR | ₹21,000 | $ 240

✪ Tecno Pova Slim ✪

✪ Tecno Pova Slim ✪

images of Tecno Pova Slim

Quick Specifications

AMOLED

Dimensity 6400

8+256 GB

50+ 2 MP

5160 mAh

45 W

Full Specification

Highlights & Review Of Tecno Pova Slim

Display Review:

Processor Review:

Ram & Memory Review:

Cameras Review:

Battery Review:

Final Verdict :

Ranking:

Pros And Cons of Tecno Pova Slim

Pros of Mobile

Cons of Mobile

Best For - Not Best For

Best For

Not Best For

Trailer And Unboxing of Tecno Pova Slim

Disassembly Or Teardown And Gaming Test of Tecno Pova Slim

Camera Test Tecno Pova Slim

Rival Mobiles

Related Comparisions

Related Comparisons

TECNO Series

FAQs Questions

Faisal Ur Rehman

Faisal Ur Rehman

What display type does Tecno Pova Slim use, and how bright is its screen?

Which processor is used in Tecno Pova Slim?

What RAM type and storage type does Tecno Pova Slim Use?

How many megapixels are main and front cameras of Tecno Pova Slim?

What is battery capacity and Fast Charging of Tecno Pova Slim ?

What is Tecno Pova Slim price in Pakistan, India, and USD?