Xiaomi 17 Ultra vs OPPO Find X9 Ultra
Why Consider Each
An overview of the main advantages of each phone
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi 17 Ultra
- 4.0x better Digital Zoom (120 x vs 30 x)
- 33% more RAM Memory (16 + 512 GB vs 12 + 512 GB)
Reasons to consider the OPPO Find X9 Ultra
- 2.3x better Zoom (10 x vs 4.3 x)
- 50% higher HBM Brightness (1800 nits vs 1200 nits)
- 20% higher Screen Resolution (1440 x 3168 Pixels vs 1200 x 2608 Pixels)
- 20% higher Refresh Rate (144 Hz vs 120 Hz)
- 18% larger Battery (7050 mAh vs 6000 mAh)
- 15% lighter Weight (187 g vs 219 grams)
- 11% higher Charging Watts (100 W vs 90 W)
- Includes Reverse Charging
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Product Name | Xiaomi 17 Ultra | OPPO Find X9 Ultra |
| Brand | Xiaomi | OPPO |
| Official Brand Link | Visit | Visit |
| Mobile Image |
 |
 |
| Price | 480000 PKR | 580000 PKR |
| Price India | ₹140000 | ₹170000 |
| Price USA | $1300 | $1500 |
| Variants Prices | 16 + 512 GB 16 + 1TB | 12 + 512 GB 16 + 512 GB 16 + 1TB |
| Display | ||
| Phone Dimensions | 162.9 x 77.6 x 8.3 mm | 163.2 x 77.0 x 8.7 / 9.1 mm |
| Screen Size | 6.9 inch | 6.82 inch |
| Screen Resolution | 1200 x 2608 Pixels | 1440 x 3168 Pixels |
| Refresh Rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Screen Type | LTPO AMOLED | LTPO Amoled |
| Peak Brightness | 3500 nits | 3600 nits |
| HBM Brightness | 1200 nits | 1800 nits |
| Performance | ||
| Processor | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 |
| Lithography Process | 3 nm | 3 nm |
| Max Clock | 4.6 GHz | 4.6 GHz |
| CPU Cores | Octa-core | 8 Cores |
| Architecture | 2 x 4.6 GHz Oryon V3 Phoenix L | 2 x 4.6 GHz Oryon V3 Phoenix L |
| GPU | Adreno 840 | Adreno 840 |
| AnTuTu Benchmark | 4 M | 4 M |
| Bootup Time | - | 14 s |
| Memory | ||
| RAM Memory | 16 + 512 GB | 12 + 512 GB |
| RAM Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 4.1 |
| Card Slot | No | No |
| Variants | 16+ 512 GB/1 TB | 12 + 256GB |
| Rear Camera | ||
| Camera | 200 + 50 + 50 MP | 200 + 200 + 50 + 50 MP |
| Image Resolution | 8160 × 6144 pixels | 16320 × 12240 pixels |
| Camera Sensor | 200 MP = Samsung ISOCELL HPE | 200 MP = Sony LYT-901 |
| Zoom | 4.3 x | 10 x |
| Digital Zoom | 120 x | 30 x |
| Video Recording | 8K@30 fps | 8K @ 30 fps |
| Flash | Dual LED | Yes |
| Front Camera | ||
| Front Camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Front Sensor | 50 MP = Omnivision OV50M | 50 MP = Samsung ISOCELL JN5 |
| Front Resolution | 8192 x 6144 Pixels | 8192 x 6144 Pixels |
| Front Recording | 4K @ 60fps | 4K @ 30/60 fps |
| Front Flash | Screen Flash | Screen Flash |
| Battery | ||
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 7050 mAh |
| Charging Watts | 90 W | 100 W |
| Battery Type | Si/C Li-Ion | Silicon-Carbon |
| Wireless Charging | 50 W | 50 W |
| Reverse Charging | 22.5W | Yes |
| Reverse Wireless | Not Confirm | 10 W |
| Battery Life (PC Mark) | 15h | 14h |
| Charging Time | 45-50 Mints ( 0-100% ) | 35-40 m (0% To 100%) |
| Software | ||
| Model Number | 25128PNA1G | CPH2841 |
| Release Date | 10 March, 2026 | 2 May, 2026 |
| Year | 2026 | 2026 |
| Series Name | Xiaomi Number | Find X |
| Category | Flagship | Flagship |
| Android OS | Android 17 , HyperOS 4 | Android 17 Now |
| Body | ||
| Weight | 219 grams | 187 g |
| Build | Aluminium Alloy + leather back | Frame Aluminum + Glass/Eco Leather Back |
| IP Rating | — | — |
| Special Features | Leica-tuned lenses with color spectrum sensor | Laser AF · Hasselblad Color Calibration· |
| Connectivity | ||
| SIM | Nano-SIM / E-Sim | Nano-SIM / E-Sim |
| Network | 4G / 4G+ / 5G/ 5G+ | 4G / 4G+ / 5G |
| WiFi | Wi-Fi 7 | WiFi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 6.0 | 6.0 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Security & Audio | ||
| Speakers | Dual Stereo Speaker | Dual Stereo Speaker |
| Fingerprint | Hyper Sonic Front Finger | Hyper Sonic Front Finger |
| Other Sensors | Proximity sensor | Accelerometer |
| Highlights | ||
| Display Highlights |
 |
 |
| Processor Highlights |
 |
 |
| Memory Highlights |
 |
 |
| Camera Highlights |
 |
 |
| Battery Highlights |
 |
 |
| Verdict | ||
| Pros | ✅ 200MP Telephoto | ✅ Flagship Performance ⚡ |
| Cons | ❌ Heavy 219g | ❌ No Headphone Jack 🎧 |
| Best For | ✅ Mobile Photography | 🎯 Mobile Photography 📸 |
| Not Best For | ❌ Compact Phone Lovers | 🚫 Budget Buyers 💸 |
| Related Media | ||
| Rival Devices | Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra | — |
| Unboxing | ||
| Mobile Disassembly | ||
| PUBG Gaming Test | ||
| Camera Test | ||
Cast your vote
So, which phone would you choose?
Total votes: 0
This comparison covers specs and pricing for 50+ countries — select your country next to the search bar to see local pricing based on the live USD rate. Prices can vary by region due to local taxes, import duties, and retailer markups.
How the Comparison Tool Works