Vivo x300 Ultra vs Xiaomi 17 Ultra
Why Consider Each
An overview of the main advantages of each phone
Reasons to consider the Vivo x300 Ultra
- + 58% higher HBM Brightness (~1900 nits vs 1200 nits)
- + 29% higher Peak Brightness (4500 nits vs 3500 nits)
- + 20% higher Screen Resolution (1440 x 3168 Pixels vs 1200 x 2608 Pixels)
- + 20% higher Refresh Rate (144 Hz vs 120 Hz)
- + 11% higher Charging Watts (100 W vs 90 W)
- + 10% larger Battery (6600 mAh vs 6000 mAh)
- + Includes Reverse Charging
- + Includes Reverse Wireless
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi 17 Ultra
- + 16% higher Zoom (4.3 x vs 3.7 x)
- + 14% higher Digital Zoom (120 x vs 105 X)
- + 11% newer Bluetooth (6.0 vs 5.4)
- + 6% lighter Weight (219 grams vs 232 g - 237 g)
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Product Name | Vivo x300 Ultra | Xiaomi 17 Ultra |
| Brand | Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Official Brand Link | Visit | Visit |
| Mobile Image |
![]() |
![]() |
| Price | 480000 PKR | 460000 PKR |
| Price India | ₹160000 | ₹140000 |
| Price USA | $1530 | $1300 |
| Variants Prices | 16GB + 512GB = 1280$ | 170,000 INR | 530,000 PKR | 16 + 512 GB 16 + 1TB |
| Display | ||
| Phone Dimensions | 163 x 76.8 x 8.2 mm (or 8.5 mm variant) | 162.9 x 77.6 x 8.3 mm |
| Screen Size | 6.82 inch | 6.9 inch |
| Screen Resolution | 1440 x 3168 Pixels | 1200 x 2608 Pixels |
| Refresh Rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Screen Type | LTPO Amoled | LTPO AMOLED |
| Peak Brightness | 4500 nits | 3500 nits |
| HBM Brightness | ~1900 nits | 1200 nits |
| Performance | ||
| Processor | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 |
| Lithography Process | 3 nm | 3 nm |
| Max Clock | 4.6 GHz | 4.6 GHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 Cores | Octa-core |
| Architecture | 2 x 4.6 GHz Oryon V3 Phoenix L | 2 x 4.6 GHz Oryon V3 Phoenix L |
| GPU | Adreno 840 | Adreno 840 |
| AnTuTu Benchmark | 4.1 M | 4 M |
| Bootup Time | 21s | - |
| Memory | ||
| RAM Memory | 16 + 1TB | 16 + 512 GB |
| RAM Type | LPDDR5X (5300 MHz) | LPDDR5X |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 4.1 |
| Card Slot | No | No |
| Variants | 16GB + 512GB | 16+ 512 GB/1 TB |
| Rear Camera | ||
| Camera | 200 + 200 + 50 MP | 200 + 50 + 50 MP |
| Image Resolution | 16,330 × 12,247 pixels. | 8160 × 6144 pixels |
| Camera Sensor | 200 MP= Sony LYT-901 | 200 MP = Samsung ISOCELL HPE |
| Zoom | 3.7 x | 4.3 x |
| Digital Zoom | 105 X | 120 x |
| Video Recording | 8K@30fps | 8K@30 fps |
| Flash | Dual-LED Flash | Dual LED |
| Front Camera | ||
| Front Camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Front Sensor | 50 MP=Samsung ISOCELL JN5 | 50 MP = Omnivision OV50M |
| Front Resolution | 8192 x 6144 Pixels | 8192 x 6144 Pixels |
| Front Recording | 4K@30/60fps | 4K @ 60fps |
| Front Flash | No | Screen Flash |
| Battery | ||
| Battery | 6600 mAh | 6000 mAh |
| Charging Watts | 100 W | 90 W |
| Battery Type | Silicon-Carbon | Si/C Li-Ion |
| Wireless Charging | 40 W | 50 W |
| Reverse Charging | Yes | 22.5W |
| Reverse Wireless | Yes | Not Confirm |
| Battery Life (PC Mark) | ~15 hours | 15h |
| Charging Time | ~30-40m (0% To 100%) | 45-50 Mints ( 0-100% ) |
| Software | ||
| Model Number | V2547A | 25128PNA1G |
| Release Date | 3 April, 2026 | 10 March, 2026 |
| Year | 2026 | 2026 |
| Series Name | Vivo X Series | Xiaomi Number |
| Category | Flagship | Flagship |
| Android OS | Android 17, OriginOS 7 | Android 17 , HyperOS 4 |
| Body | ||
| Weight | 232 g - 237 g | 219 grams |
| Build | Frame Aluminum And Glass Back | Aluminium Alloy + leather back |
| IP Rating | — | — |
| Special Features | Zeiss optics & Zeiss T* lens coating | Leica-tuned lenses with color spectrum sensor |
| Connectivity | ||
| SIM | Nano-SIM / E-Sim | Nano-SIM / E-Sim |
| Network | 4G / 4G+ / 5G/ 5G+ | 4G / 4G+ / 5G/ 5G+ |
| WiFi | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 6.0 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Security & Audio | ||
| Speakers | Dual Stereo Speaker | Dual Stereo Speaker |
| Fingerprint | Hyper Sonic Front Finger | Hyper Sonic Front Finger |
| Other Sensors | Accelerometer | Proximity sensor |
| Highlights | ||
| Display Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Processor Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Memory Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Camera Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Battery Highlights |
![]() |
![]() |
| Verdict | ||
| Pros | ✅ Flagship Performance (Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5) | ✅ 200MP Telephoto |
| Cons | ❌ No SD Card (No microSD Support) | ❌ Heavy 219g |
| Best For | ✅ Mobile Photography | ✅ Mobile Photography |
| Not Best For | ❌ Budget Buyers | ❌ Compact Phone Lovers |
| Related Media | ||
| Rival Devices | iPhone 17 Pro Max | Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra |
| Unboxing | ||
| Mobile Disassembly | ||
| PUBG Gaming Test | ||
| Camera Test | ||
Cast your vote
So, which phone would you choose?
Total votes: 0
Related Comparisons
- iPhone 17 Pro Max vs Vivo x300 Ultra
- Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Vivo x300 Ultra
- Vivo x300 Ultra vs Xiaomi 15 Ultra
- Vivo x300 Ultra vs OPPO Find X9 Ultra
- Vivo x300 Ultra vs Poco F9 Ultra
- Redmagic 11s Pro vs Vivo x300 Ultra
- Redmagic 11s Pro vs Xiaomi 17 Ultra
- IQOO 15 Ultra vs Xiaomi 17 Ultra
- IQOO 15 Ultra vs Vivo x300 Ultra
- iPhone 17 Pro Max vs Xiaomi 17 Ultra
- Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Xiaomi 17 Ultra
- IQOO 15 vs Vivo x300 Ultra
- Xiaomi 17 Ultra vs OPPO Find X9 Ultra
- Xiaomi 17 Ultra vs Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
- Xiaomi 17 Ultra vs Xiaomi 15 Ultra
- Xiaomi 17 Ultra vs OnePlus 15
- Vivo x300 Ultra vs Poco F8 Ultra
- Xiaomi 17 Ultra vs Redmi K100 Pro Max
This comparison covers specs and pricing for 50+ countries — select your country next to the search bar to see local pricing based on the live USD rate. Prices can vary by region due to local taxes, import duties, and retailer markups.
How the Comparison Tool Works











