Oppo Reno 16F vs Honor X9d
Why Consider Each
An overview of the main advantages of each phone
Reasons to consider the Oppo Reno 16F
- 3.1x better Front Camera (50 MP vs 16 MP)
- 21% higher Charging Watts (80 W vs 66 W)
- 9% higher Max Clock (2.5 GHz vs 2.3 GHz)
- Processor Link: https://fsl-specs.com/mobile-processo…
- Includes Card Slot
- Zoom: 3.5 x
- Digital Zoom: 10 x
- Higher Front Recording: 4K @ 30 fps 1080p @ 30 fps vs 1080p @ 30 fps
- Includes Reverse Charging
- Includes Reverse Wireless
- Model Number: CPH2859
Reasons to consider the Honor X9d
- 2.2x better Camera (108 + 5 MP vs 50 + 50 + 8 MP)
- 50% more RAM Memory (12 + 256 GB vs 8 + 256 GB)
- 29% higher HBM Brightness (1800 nits vs 1400 nits)
- 19% larger Battery (8300 mAh vs 7000 mAh)
- 11% higher Screen Resolution (1200 x 2640 pixels vs 1080 x 2372 pixels)
- Peak Brightness: 6000 nits
- Better Processor: Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 vs Mediatek Dimensity 7300
- Better RAM Type: LPDDR5 vs LPDDR4X
- Camera Sensor: 108 MP = Samsung HM6
- Front Sensor: 16 MP = Not Confirm
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Product Name | Oppo Reno 16F | Honor X9d |
| Brand | OPPO | Honor |
| Official Brand Link | Visit | Visit |
| Mobile Image |
 |
 |
| Price | 140000 PKR | 138000 PKR |
| Price India | ₹53000 | ₹35000 |
| Price USA | $550 | $370 |
| Display | ||
| Phone Dimensions | 158.2 x 74.5 x 8.4 mm or 8.6 mm | 161.9 x 76.1 x 7.8 mm |
| Screen Size | 6.57 inch | 6.79 inch |
| Screen Resolution | 1080 x 2372 pixels | 1200 x 2640 pixels |
| Refresh Rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Screen Type | Amoled | Amoled |
| Peak Brightness | — | 6000 nits |
| HBM Brightness | 1400 nits | 1800 nits |
| Performance | ||
| Processor | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 | Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 |
| Processor Link | Visit | — |
| Lithography Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Max Clock | 2.5 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 Cores | 8 Cores |
| Architecture | 4 x 2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 | 1 x 2.3 GHz Cortex-A720s |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Adreno 810 |
| AnTuTu Benchmark | 990 K | 977 K |
| Memory | ||
| RAM Memory | 8 + 256 GB | 12 + 256 GB |
| RAM Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5 |
| Storage Type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Card Slot | Yes | No |
| Variants | 8 + 128 GB | 8 + 256 GB |
| Rear Camera | ||
| Camera | 50 + 50 + 8 MP | 108 + 5 MP |
| Image Resolution | 8150 x 6150 pixels | 12,000 × 9,000 pixels |
| Camera Sensor | — | 108 MP = Samsung HM6 |
| Zoom | 3.5 x | — |
| Digital Zoom | 10 x | — |
| Video Recording | 4K @ 30/60 fps | 4K @ 30 fps |
| Flash | Multi-focus LED flash | Yes |
| Front Camera | ||
| Front Camera | 50 MP | 16 MP |
| Front Sensor | — | 16 MP = Not Confirm |
| Front Resolution | 8192 x 6144 Pixels | 4616 × 3462 Pixels |
| Front Recording | 4K @ 30 fps | 1080p @ 30 fps |
| Front Flash | Screen Flash | Screen Flash |
| Battery | ||
| Battery | 7000 mAh | 8300 mAh |
| Charging Watts | 80 W | 66 W |
| Battery Type | Silicon-Carbon | Silicon-Carbon |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | Yes | 7.5 W |
| Reverse Wireless | No | — |
| Battery Life (PC Mark) | 1:02 hr | — |
| Charging Time | Yes (50% in 30 min) | — |
| Software | ||
| Model Number | CPH2859 | — |
| Release Date | 13 July, 2026 | 9 October, 2025 |
| Year | 2026 | 2025 |
| Series Name | Oppo Reno Series | Number Series |
| Category | Mid Range | Mid Range |
| Android OS | Android 16 | Android 15 |
| Body | ||
| Weight | 195 g | 193 g |
| Build | glass back and plastic back | Frame And Back ( Plastic ) |
| IP Rating | IP68/IP69K | IP68 / IP69K |
| Connectivity | ||
| SIM | Nano-SIM / E-Sim | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Network | 4G / 4G+ / 5G | 4G / 4G+ / 5G |
| WiFi | WiFi 6 | WiFi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Security & Audio | ||
| Speakers | Dual Stereo Speaker | Dual Stereo Speaker |
| Fingerprint | Front Finger | Front Finger |
| Other Sensors | Accelerometer | Accelerometer |
| Highlights | ||
| Display Highlights |
 |
 |
| Processor Highlights |
 |
 |
| Memory Highlights |
 |
 |
| Camera Highlights |
 |
 |
| Battery Highlights |
 |
 |
| Verdict | ||
| Pros | ✅ 7000mAh Large Battery 🔋 | ✅ 8300mAh massive battery🔋 |
| Cons | ❌ Dimensity 7300 Performance ⚙️ | ❌ Only 66W charging⚡ |
| Best For | 🎯 Long Battery Users 🔋 | 🎯 Outdoor/travel users🧳 |
| Not Best For | 🚫 Hardcore Gamers 🎮 | 🚫 Gaming enthusiasts🎮 |
| Related Media | ||
| Unboxing | ||
| Mobile Disassembly | ||
| PUBG Gaming Test | ||
| Camera Test | — | |
Cast your vote
So, which phone would you choose?
Total votes: 0
This comparison covers specs and pricing for 50+ countries — select your country next to the search bar to see local pricing based on the live USD rate. Prices can vary by region due to local taxes, import duties, and retailer markups.
How the Comparison Tool Works