Xiaomi 17T Pro vs iQOO Neo 11 Ultra
Why Consider Each
An overview of the main advantages of each phone
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi 17T Pro
- + 2.0x better Front Camera (32 MP vs 16 MP)
- + 11% newer Bluetooth (6.0 vs 5.4)
- + Better Processor: Dimensity 9500 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9500M
- + Zoom: 5 x
- + Digital Zoom: 120 x
- + Flash: Dual LED
- + Higher Front Recording: 4K @ 30fps 1080p @ 60fps vs 1080p @30/60 fps
- + Includes Reverse Charging
- + Special Features: Leica Summilux lens system (1G + 6P) …
- + Other Sensors: Proximity sensor Gyroscope Accelerome…
Reasons to consider the iQOO Neo 11 Ultra
- + 33% more RAM Memory (16+ 512 GB vs 12 + 512 GB)
- + 30% larger Battery (9100 mAh vs 7000 mAh)
- + 29% higher Peak Brightness (4500 nits vs 3500 nits)
- + 13% higher Screen Resolution (1440 × 3200 Pixels vs 1280 x 2772 Pixels)
- + 5% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (3.58 M vs 3.4 M)
- + Processor Link: https://fsl-specs.com/mobile-processo…
- + Includes Reverse Wireless
- + IP Rating: IP68/IP69
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Product Name | Xiaomi 17T Pro | iQOO Neo 11 Ultra |
| Brand | Xiaomi | IQOO |
| Official Brand Link | Visit | Visit |
| Mobile Image |
![]() |
![]() |
| Price | 265000 PKR | 240000 PKR |
| Price India | ₹80000 | ₹60000 |
| Price USA | $750 | $650 |
| Variants Prices | 12 + 512 GB 12 + 1 TB | 12GB + 256GB 16GB + 256GB 12GB + 512GB 16GB + 512GB 16GB + 1TB |
| Display | ||
| Phone Dimensions | 162.2 x 77.5 x 8.3 mm | 163.4 x 75.9 x 8.6 mm |
| Screen Size | 6.83 inch | 6.83 inch |
| Screen Resolution | 1280 x 2772 Pixels | 1440 × 3200 Pixels |
| Refresh Rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Screen Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Peak Brightness | 3500 nits | 4500 nits |
| HBM Brightness | 2000 nits | 2000 nits |
| Performance | ||
| Processor | Dimensity 9500 | MediaTek Dimensity 9500M |
| Processor Link | — | Visit |
| Lithography Process | 3 nm | 3 nm |
| Max Clock | 4.21 GHz | 4.21 GHz |
| CPU Cores | Octa-core | 8 Cores |
| Architecture | 1 x 4.21 GHz C1-Ultra | 1 × 4.21 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G1 Ultra MC12 | ARM G1-Ultra |
| AnTuTu Benchmark | 3.4 M | 3.58 M |
| Bootup Time | - | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM Memory | 12 + 512 GB | 16+ 512 GB |
| RAM Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 4.1 |
| Card Slot | No | No |
| Variants | 12 + 256 GB | 12+ 256 / 512GB |
| Rear Camera | ||
| Camera | 50 + 50 + 12 MP | 50 + 8 MP |
| Image Resolution | 8160 × 6144 pixels | 8150 x 6150 pixels |
| Camera Sensor | 50 MP = Omnivision 950 LightHunter | 50 MP = Sony LYT-700C |
| Zoom | 5 x | — |
| Digital Zoom | 120 x | — |
| Video Recording | 8K@30 fps | 8K @30fps |
| Flash | Dual LED | — |
| Front Camera | ||
| Front Camera | 32 MP | 16 MP |
| Front Sensor | – | 16 MP = Sony IMX480 / GalaxyCore GC16B3C |
| Front Resolution | 6528 × 4896 Pixels | 4608 × 3456 pixels |
| Front Recording | 4K @ 30fps | 1080p @30/60 fps |
| Front Flash | - | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery | 7000 mAh | 9100 mAh |
| Charging Watts | 100 W | 100 W |
| Battery Type | Si/C Li-Ion | Si/C Li-Ion |
| Wireless Charging | 50 W | No |
| Reverse Charging | 22.5W | — |
| Reverse Wireless | Not Confirm | Yes |
| Battery Life (PC Mark) | - | — |
| Charging Time | 40–45 minutes ( 0-100% ) | 1:20 hr |
| Software | ||
| Model Number | 2602EPTC0G | V2573A |
| Release Date | 28 May, 2026 | 18 August, 2026 |
| Year | 2026 | 2026 |
| Series Name | Xiaomi Number | Neo Series |
| Category | Flagship | Flagship / Gaming |
| Android OS | Android 17 , HyperOS 4 | Android 16 |
| Body | ||
| Weight | 219 grams | 225 g |
| Build | Aluminium Alloy +Glass back | Aluminum frame , Back Glass |
| IP Rating | — | IP68/IP69 |
| Special Features | Leica Summilux lens system (1G + 6P) with optical image stabilization | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| SIM | Nano-SIM / E-Sim | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Network | 4G / 4G+ / 5G/ 5G+ | 4G / 4G+ / 5G/ 5G+ |
| WiFi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 6.0 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Security & Audio | ||
| Speakers | Dual Stereo Speaker | Dual Stereo Speaker |
| Fingerprint | Hyper Sonic Front Finger | Hyper Sonic Front Finger |
| Other Sensors | Proximity sensor | — |
| Highlights | ||
| Display Highlights |
![]() | — |
| Processor Highlights |
![]() | — |
| Memory Highlights |
![]() | — |
| Camera Highlights |
![]() | — |
| Battery Highlights |
![]() | — |
| Verdict | ||
| Pros | ✅ 144Hz AMOLED | ✅ 9100mAh Battery 🔋 |
| Cons | ❌ No MicroSD | ❌ 225g Heavy Weight ⚖️ |
| Best For | ✅ Telephoto Photography | 🎯 Heavy Gaming 🎮 |
| Not Best For | ❌ Lightweight Phone Users | 🚫 Lightweight Phone Fans ⚖️ |
| Related Media | ||
| Unboxing | ||
| Mobile Disassembly | ||
| PUBG Gaming Test | ||
| Camera Test | — | |
Cast your vote
So, which phone would you choose?
Total votes: 0
Related Comparisons
- Samsung Galaxy S26 vs Xiaomi 17T Pro
- Xiaomi 17T Pro vs Xiaomi 17
- Xiaomi Redmi K90 Max vs Xiaomi 17T Pro
- vivo x300 pro vs Xiaomi 17T Pro
- Samsung Galaxy S26 Plus vs Xiaomi 17T Pro
- IQOO 15 vs Xiaomi 17T Pro
- vivo x300 vs Xiaomi 17T Pro
- Xiaomi 17T Pro vs Huawei Pura 90 Pro Max
- Xiaomi Redmi K90 Max vs iQOO Neo 11 Ultra
This comparison covers specs and pricing for 50+ countries — select your country next to the search bar to see local pricing based on the live USD rate. Prices can vary by region due to local taxes, import duties, and retailer markups.
How the Comparison Tool Works






