Xiaomi Redmi K90 Max vs iQOO Neo 11 Ultra
Why Consider Each
An overview of the main advantages of each phone
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Redmi K90 Max
- + 25% higher Front Camera (20 MP vs 16 MP)
- + 15% higher Refresh Rate (165 Hz vs 144 Hz)
- + 6% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (~3.8 M vs 3.58 M)
- + Better Processor: Dimensity 9500 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9500M
- + Zoom: 5 X
- + Digital Zoom: 20 X
- + Flash: Dual LED
- + Front Flash: No
- + Includes Reverse Charging
- + Special Features: Built-in active cooling fan Infrared …
- + Other Sensors: Proximity sensor Gyroscope Accelerome…
Reasons to consider the iQOO Neo 11 Ultra
- + 29% higher Peak Brightness (4500 nits vs 3500 nits)
- + 13% higher Screen Resolution (1440 × 3200 Pixels vs 1280 x 2772 Pixels)
- + 6% larger Battery (9100 mAh vs 8550 mAh)
- + Processor Link: https://fsl-specs.com/mobile-processo…
- + Includes Reverse Wireless
- + IP Rating: IP68/IP69
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Product Name | Xiaomi Redmi K90 Max | iQOO Neo 11 Ultra |
| Brand | Xiaomi | IQOO |
| Official Brand Link | Visit | Visit |
| Mobile Image |
![]() |
![]() |
| Price | 260000 🚫 PKR | 240000 PKR |
| Price India | ₹80000 | ₹60000 |
| Price USA | $820 | $650 |
| Variants Prices | 16 + 256 GB 16 + 512 GB 16 + 1 TB | 12GB + 256GB 16GB + 256GB 12GB + 512GB 16GB + 512GB 16GB + 1TB |
| Display | ||
| Phone Dimensions | 162.9 x 77.9 x 8.2 mm | 163.4 x 75.9 x 8.6 mm |
| Screen Size | 6.83 inch | 6.83 inch |
| Screen Resolution | 1280 x 2772 Pixels | 1440 × 3200 Pixels |
| Refresh Rate | 165 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Screen Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Peak Brightness | 3500 nits | 4500 nits |
| HBM Brightness | 2000 nits | 2000 nits |
| Performance | ||
| Processor | Dimensity 9500 | MediaTek Dimensity 9500M |
| Processor Link | — | Visit |
| Lithography Process | 3 nm | 3 nm |
| Max Clock | 4.21 GHz | 4.21 GHz |
| CPU Cores | Octa-core | 8 Cores |
| Architecture | 1 x 4.21 GHz C1-Ultra | 1 × 4.21 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G1 Ultra MC12 | ARM G1-Ultra |
| AnTuTu Benchmark | ~3.8 M | 3.58 M |
| Bootup Time | - | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM Memory | 16 + 1 TB | 16+ 512 GB |
| RAM Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 4.1 |
| Card Slot | No | No |
| Variants | 12+ 256 /512 GB | 12+ 256 / 512GB |
| Rear Camera | ||
| Camera | 50 + 8 MP | 50 + 8 MP |
| Image Resolution | 8160 × 6144 pixels | 8150 x 6150 pixels |
| Camera Sensor | 50 MP = Omnivision OV50 Light Fusion 800 | 50 MP = Sony LYT-700C |
| Zoom | 5 X | — |
| Digital Zoom | 20 X | — |
| Video Recording | 8K@30fps | 8K @30fps |
| Flash | Dual LED | — |
| Front Camera | ||
| Front Camera | 20 MP | 16 MP |
| Front Sensor | 20 MP = Not Confirm | 16 MP = Sony IMX480 / GalaxyCore GC16B3C |
| Front Resolution | 5472 x 3648 Pixels | 4608 × 3456 pixels |
| Front Recording | 1080p @ 60fps | 1080p @30/60 fps |
| Front Flash | No | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery | 8550 mAh | 9100 mAh |
| Charging Watts | 100 W | 100 W |
| Battery Type | Si/C Li-Ion | Si/C Li-Ion |
| Wireless Charging | 50 W | No |
| Reverse Charging | 22.5W | — |
| Reverse Wireless | - | Yes |
| Battery Life (PC Mark) | 20 hours , 50 mint | — |
| Charging Time | ~ 45–55 minutes | 1:20 hr |
| Software | ||
| Model Number | 25102RKBEC | V2573A |
| Release Date | 21 April, 2026 | 18 August, 2026 |
| Year | 2026 | 2026 |
| Series Name | Redmi K Series | Neo Series |
| Category | Flagship | Flagship / Gaming |
| Android OS | Android 17 , HyperOS 4 | Android 16 |
| Body | ||
| Weight | 227 grams | 225 g |
| Build | Aluminium Alloy + Fiberglass Back | Aluminum frame , Back Glass |
| IP Rating | — | IP68/IP69 |
| Special Features | Built-in active cooling fan Infrared port | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Network | 4G / 4G+ / 5G/ 5G+ | 4G / 4G+ / 5G/ 5G+ |
| WiFi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Security & Audio | ||
| Speakers | Dual Stereo Speaker | Dual Stereo Speaker |
| Fingerprint | Hyper Sonic Front Finger | Hyper Sonic Front Finger |
| Other Sensors | Proximity sensor | — |
| Highlights | ||
| Display Highlights |
![]() | — |
| Processor Highlights |
![]() | — |
| Memory Highlights |
![]() | — |
| Camera Highlights |
![]() | — |
| Battery Highlights |
![]() | — |
| Verdict | ||
| Pros | ✅ Dragon Crystal Glass | ✅ 9100mAh Battery 🔋 |
| Cons | ❌China-only release | ❌ 225g Heavy Weight ⚖️ |
| Best For | ✅ Heavay Gaming | 🎯 Heavy Gaming 🎮 |
| Not Best For | ❌ Compact phone users | 🚫 Lightweight Phone Fans ⚖️ |
| Related Media | ||
| Unboxing | ||
| Mobile Disassembly | ||
| PUBG Gaming Test | ||
| Camera Test | — | |
Cast your vote
So, which phone would you choose?
Total votes: 0
This comparison covers specs and pricing for 50+ countries — select your country next to the search bar to see local pricing based on the live USD rate. Prices can vary by region due to local taxes, import duties, and retailer markups.
How the Comparison Tool Works






